본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

AHP기법을 이용한 수요자 중심의 농업가뭄 영향 평가 기준 도출 연구

A Study on the Derivation of the User-Oriented Agricultural Drought Assessment Criteria Using the AHP technique

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

Currently in the drought evaluation, which is a supplier-oriented standard that applies storage rates of reservoirs, evaluation for users that use agricultural water is not done. Therefore, this study established drought evaluation items for drought evaluation based on farmers' judgement, conducted a survey on farmers and experts, compared and analyzed weighted value between two groups, and then classified the evaluation standards per each evaluation item. The agricultural drought evaluation items are 5 major items of water supply lapse rate, agricultural weather, agricultural irrigation facility, crop and soil, and 12 subsections for regional characteristics and opinions of consumers that use water to be reflected. The result of analyzing weighted value of farmers and experts' major items shows that farmers is agricultural irrigation facility(0.219), water supply lapse rate(0.211), agricultural weather(0.204), crop(0.183) and soil(0.183). Experts is agricultural weather(0.297), agricultural irrigation facility(0.202), water supply lapse rate(0.189), crop(0.162) and soil(0.150), which displays difference between the two groups. The agricultural drought criteria standards are established based on precedent studies and cases, and grades of evaluation items are 1st grade(extreme stage), 2nd grade(warning stage), 3rd grade(alert stage) and 4th grade(attention stage). The above analysis per each consumer-oriented agricultural drought evaluation item and the analysis on the standards of evaluation grades are expected to be used as a basic resource for establishing agriculture drought policy and selecting drought area in the future.

Abstract

Currently in the drought evaluation, which is a supplier-oriented standard that applies storage rates of reservoirs, evaluation for users that use agricultural water is not done. Therefore, this study established drought evaluation items for drought evaluation based on farmers' judgement, conducted a survey on farmers and experts, compared and analyzed weighted value between two groups, and then classified the evaluation standards per each evaluation item. The agricultural drought evaluation items are 5 major items of water supply lapse rate, agricultural weather, agricultural irrigation facility, crop and soil, and 12 subsections for regional characteristics and opinions of consumers that use water to be reflected. The result of analyzing weighted value of farmers and experts' major items shows that farmers is agricultural irrigation facility(0.219), water supply lapse rate(0.211), agricultural weather(0.204), crop(0.183) and soil(0.183). Experts is agricultural weather(0.297), agricultural irrigation facility(0.202), water supply lapse rate(0.189), crop(0.162) and soil(0.150), which displays difference between the two groups. The agricultural drought criteria standards are established based on precedent studies and cases, and grades of evaluation items are 1st grade(extreme stage), 2nd grade(warning stage), 3rd grade(alert stage) and 4th grade(attention stage). The above analysis per each consumer-oriented agricultural drought evaluation item and the analysis on the standards of evaluation grades are expected to be used as a basic resource for establishing agriculture drought policy and selecting drought area in the future.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Byun, H. R., "Comparative analysis of the drought diagnosis and related systems", Journal of KOSHAM, 9(2), pp.7~18 (2009)
  2. Choi. J. H., "Comparison of Drought Characteristics using RAI and Soil Moisture", Proceedings of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers Conference, 2017, pp.237~ (2017)
  3. Eizo Kinoshita, "戦略的意思決定手法 AHP", pp.3~30 (2012), Cheongram book publishing company
  4. 장동헌, "계층분석과정(AHP)을 활용한 권역단위 종합정비사업 사무장 의식의 상대적 중요도 평가", 농촌계획, 21(1), pp.41~50 (2015), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  5. 2017, Abnormal climate report, "KMA", Korea Meteorological Administration, 22~30, pp.11-1360000-000705-01 (2016)
  6. "Korea Meteorological Administration" (2018)[URL]
  7. 김병식, "표준강수 증발산지수(SPEI)를 이용한 남한지역의 가뭄심도 평가", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 45(9), pp.887~900 (2012), 한국수자원학회
  8. 김진혁, "표준강수증발산량지수를 이용한 북한지역 과거와 미래 가뭄 평가", Crisisonomy, 14(2), pp.139~151 (2018), (사)위기관리이론과실천[DOI]
  9. Kim. S. J., "Comparison of Reservoir Drought Index According to the Period Reservoir Storage Data on Agricultural Reservoir", Agricultural Engineers Conference, 2017, pp.71~ (2017)
  10. KRC, "Statistical yearbook of land water development for agriculture", Korea Rural Community Corporation, 30~57 (2017)
  11. KRC, "Current status and countermeasures of drought by si-do", ~ (2017)
  12. KRC, "Reservoir storage rate of reservoir by si-gun", ~ (2017)
  13. "Korea Rural Community Corporation" (2018)[URL]
  14. 권형중, "SWSI 가뭄지수를 보완한 농촌용수구역 단위의 가뭄 평가", 한국지리정보학회지, 10(1), pp.22~34 (2007), 한국지리정보학회
  15. Lee, S. J., "User-oriented agricultural drought analysis sin AHP techniques", Master, pp.2018
  16. Nam. W. H., "Agricultural Drought Risk Assessment using Reservoir Drought Index", Crisisonomy, 14(12), pp.139~151 (2013)
  17. 남원호, "식생가뭄반응지수 (VegDRI)를 활용한 위성영상 기반 가뭄 평가", 한국농공학회논문집, 57(4), pp.1~9 (2015), 한국농공학회
  18. "National Drought Information-Analysis Center" (2018)[URL]
  19. MOLEG, "Countermeasures Against Natural Disasters Act Enforcement Ordinance", Ministry of Government Legislation, 3~ (2018)
  20. "Agricultural Weather Information Service"[URL]
  21. Son. J. K., "Development of agricultural drought risk and response management system", pp.1~5 (2016), Yeongsong publishing company, Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)