돼지의 경골에 식립된 지르코니아 임플란트의 골유착에 관한 연구
Osseointegration of zirconia implant in the tibia of pigs
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
연구 목적: 최근 지르코니아 임플란트가 크게 향상된 물리적 성질, 자연치와 유사한 색조, 뛰어난 생체 적합성으로 주목 받고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 국내에서 시판되고 있는 상용 타이타늄 임플란트와 개발 단계인 지르코니아 임플란트의 골유착을 비교 연구하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 상용 타이타늄 임플란트(T 군)와 기계 절삭된 나사형 지르코니아 임플란트(Z 군), 기계 절삭 후 알루미나 샌드 블라스팅으로 표면 처리된 나사형 지르코니아 임플란트(ZS 군)의 표면 거칠기를 측정한 후 6마리 돼지의 좌, 우측 하지 경골에 식립하여 1주, 4주, 12주에 각각 희생하여 Periotest values (PTVs) 측정, 조직학적 측정 및 조직 계측학적 측정, 주사 전자 현미경 관찰을 시행하였다. 평균 표면 거칠기와 PTVs, 조직계측학적 측정 결과는 일원분산분석을 통해 통계 처리되었다(α=.05). 결과:각 군 임플란트의 표면 거칠기를 측정한 결과 T 군이 Z 군, ZS 군에 비해 더 유의하게 높은 평균 표면 거칠기 값을 보였다. PTVs는 측정 시기 모두에서 T 군이 상대적으로 낮은 값을 보였으나 각 군에 따라, 시기에 따라 모두 통계적으로 유의하지는 않았다. 식립 1주차 골접촉율 측정 결과 Z 군이 T 군, ZS 군에 비해 유의성 있게 높았고, 골면적율은 T 군, Z 군이 ZS 군에 비해 유의성 있게 높았다. 식립 4주차 골접촉율 측정에서 T 군이 Z 군, ZS 군에 비해 유의성 있게 높았고, 골면적율은 군간 유의한 차가 없었다. 식립 12주차 골접촉율은 T 군, ZS 군, Z 군 순으로 낮아졌고 모든 군간 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 존재하였다. 골면적율은 T 군, ZS 군이 Z 군에 비해 유의성 있게 높았다. 결론: 이상의 결과는 지르코니아 임플란트의 골유착이 타이타늄 임플란트에 비해 부족하며, 상용화를 위해서는 지르코니아 임플란트의 표면 변형에 관한 연구가 더 필요함을 시사한다.
Abstract
Purpose: The purposes of this study were to investigate osseointegration around zirconia implants which had machined or alumina sandblasted surface, and to compare the results with titanium implants. Materials and methods: The study was performed on the tibia of 6 pigs. Three types of implants were investigated: group T-titanium implant, group Z-machined zirconia implant, group ZS-alumina sandblasting treated zirconia implant. Zirconia implants were manufactured from yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline (Acucera Inc., Pocheon, Korea). A total of 36 implants were installed in pigs' tibias. After 1, 4 and 12 weeks of healing period, the periotest and the histomorphometric analysis were performed. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and significance was assessed by the Scheffe test (α=.05). Results: In the measurement of surface roughness, highest Ra value was measured in group T with significant difference. No significant differences were found among groups regarding Periotest values. After 1 week, in comparison of bone to implant contact (BIC), group Z showed higher value with significant difference. In comparison of bone area (BA), group T and group Z showed higher value with significant difference than group ZS. After 4 weeks, in comparison of BIC, group T showed higher value with significant difference. Comparison of BA showed no significant difference among each implant. After 12 weeks, the highest mean BIC values were found in group T with significant difference. Group ZS showed higher BIC value with significant difference than group Z. In comparison of BA, group T and group ZS showed higher value with significant difference than group Z. Conclusion: Zirconia implant showed low levels of osseointegration in this experiment. Modification of surface structure should be taken into consideration in designing zirconia implants to improve the success rate.
참고문헌 (25)
- Stadlinger B, "Comparison of zirconia and titanium implants after a short healing period. A pilot study in minipigs", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 39, pp.585~592 (2010)
- Heydecke G, "Optimal esthetics in single-tooth replacement with the Re-Implant system: a case report", Int J Prosthodont, 12, pp.184~189 (1999)
- Stejskal J, "The role of metals in autoimmunity and the link to neuroendocrinology", Neuro Endocrinol Lett, 20, pp.351~364 (1999)
- Weingart D, "Titanium deposition in regional lymph nodes after insertion of titanium screw implants in maxillofacial region", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 23, pp.450~452 (1994)
- Akagawa Y, "Interface histology of unloaded and early loaded partially stabilized zirconia endosseous implant in initial bone healing", J Prosthet Dent, 69, pp.599~604 (1993)
- Hoffmann O, "The zirconia implant-bone interface: a preliminary histologic evaluation in rabbits", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.691~695 (2008)
- Andreiotelli M, "Fracture strength of zirconia implants after artificial aging", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 11, pp.158~166 (2009)
- Ichikawa Y, "Tissue compatibility and stability of a new zirconia ceramic in vivo", J Prosthet Dent, 68, pp.322~326 (1992)
- Kohal RJ, "Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: an animal experiment", J Periodontol, 75, pp.1262~1268 (2004)
- Nebe B, "Structural alterations of adhesion mediating components in cells cultured on poly-beta-hydroxy butyric acid", Biomaterials, 22, pp.2425~2434 (2001)
- Anselme K, "Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses", J Biomed Mater Res, 49, pp.155~166 (2000)
- Lincks J, "Response of MG63 osteoblastlike cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition", Biomaterials, 19, pp.2219~2232 (1998)
- Lee JH, "The effect of resorbable membrane and xenogenic graft materials on implant stability and peri-implant tissue reaction", J Korean Acad Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, pp.70~95 (2001)
- Yim JH, "The effect of various graft materials on the stability of implant and peri-implant tissue response in rabbit tibia", J Korean Acad Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, pp.41~64 (2001)
- Wennerberg A, "Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.331~344 (2000)
- Albrektsson T, "Oral implant surfaces: Part 1-review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them", Int J Prosthodont, 17, pp.536~543 (2004)
- Kieswetter K, "The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone", Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 7, pp.329~345 (1996)
- Hempel U, "Response of osteoblast-like SAOS-2 cells to zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies", Clin Oral Implants Res, 21, pp.174~181 (2010)
- Palmieri A, "Shortperiod effects of zirconia and titanium on osteoblast microRNAs", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 10, pp.200~205 (2008)
- Schliephake H, "Chemical and biological functionalization of titanium for dental implants", J Mater Chem, 18, pp.2404~2414 (2008)
- Roessler S, "Characterization of oxide layers on Ti6Al4V and titanium by streaming potential and streaming current measurements", Colloid Surf B: Biointerfaces, 26, pp.387~395 (2002)
- Leong YK, "Effect of particle size on colloidal zirconia rheology at the isoelectric point", J Am Ceram Soc, 78, pp.2209~2212 (1995)
- Shin D, "Peripheral quantitative computer tomographic, histomorphometric, and removal torque analyses of two different non-coated implants in a rabbit model", Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, pp.242~250 (2011)
- Schliephake H, "Mechanical anchorage and peri-implant bone formation of surface-modified zirconia in minipigs", J Clin Periodontol, 37, pp.818~828 (2010)
- Langhoff JD, "Comparison of chemically and pharmaceutically modified titanium and zirconia implant surfaces in dentistry: a study in sheep", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 37, pp.1125~1132 (2008)