공간정보데이터 기반의 경관보전직불제도 실태분석과 농촌공간 재생의 활용방안
Analysis of the Landscape Conservation Direct Payment System Based on Spatial Information Data and Utilization of Rural Area Regeneration
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There is a clear need to enhance the attractiveness of rural areas by leveraging their core assets to respond to emerging mega-trends. This paper analyzes the progress of the direct payment program that has been implemented to preserve agricultural landscapes in rural areas, using spatial information data. The study identified the planting characteristics of landscape crops, spatial utilization characteristics of the system, and utilization characteristics of the system by the beneficiaries. According to the analysis, the spatial utilization characteristics of the system could be classified into eight types: tourism resources and nearby agricultural areas, designation across the entire rural area, agricultural areas around villages, large-scale agricultural areas, small-scale agricultural areas, scattered and dispersed areas, independent parcels of land, and ranches. Based on the characteristics and limitations of the landscape preservation direct payment system, this study provides directions for future rural specialized zones. The landscape preservation direct payment system focuses on income support for farmers and providing agricultural benefits in terms of public interest. Meanwhile, the landscape agricultural zone serves as a rural specialized zone, highlighting the need to explore the direction of integrated rural landscape management. It is important for farmers, as the key stakeholders, to preserve the agricultural landscape in rural areas. Forming community-level cooperatives and engaging in relevant activities are crucial for achieving this goal. In order to actively preserve the agricultural landscape, it is necessary to consider the resumption of financial support for village landscape preservation activities, along with the designation of landscape agricultural zones. There is a need to conduct a specific review and explore measures to accommodate the designated landscape complexes at the local government level. The higher the ratio of designated landscape complexes, the more agricultural landscape management based on public value has been carried out. The designation of such landscape complexes can be seen as a demand for voluntary utilization of agricultural landscapes in the region. Moreover, as the ratio of designated landscape complexes increases, it becomes evident that farmers at the village level actively participate in agricultural landscape preservation and contribute to providing public value or utilize it as a tourism resource. This highlights the need for managing agricultural landscapes at the village level within the appropriate context.
Abstract
There is a clear need to enhance the attractiveness of rural areas by leveraging their core assets to respond to emerging mega-trends. This paper analyzes the progress of the direct payment program that has been implemented to preserve agricultural landscapes in rural areas, using spatial information data. The study identified the planting characteristics of landscape crops, spatial utilization characteristics of the system, and utilization characteristics of the system by the beneficiaries. According to the analysis, the spatial utilization characteristics of the system could be classified into eight types: tourism resources and nearby agricultural areas, designation across the entire rural area, agricultural areas around villages, large-scale agricultural areas, small-scale agricultural areas, scattered and dispersed areas, independent parcels of land, and ranches. Based on the characteristics and limitations of the landscape preservation direct payment system, this study provides directions for future rural specialized zones. The landscape preservation direct payment system focuses on income support for farmers and providing agricultural benefits in terms of public interest. Meanwhile, the landscape agricultural zone serves as a rural specialized zone, highlighting the need to explore the direction of integrated rural landscape management. It is important for farmers, as the key stakeholders, to preserve the agricultural landscape in rural areas. Forming community-level cooperatives and engaging in relevant activities are crucial for achieving this goal. In order to actively preserve the agricultural landscape, it is necessary to consider the resumption of financial support for village landscape preservation activities, along with the designation of landscape agricultural zones. There is a need to conduct a specific review and explore measures to accommodate the designated landscape complexes at the local government level. The higher the ratio of designated landscape complexes, the more agricultural landscape management based on public value has been carried out. The designation of such landscape complexes can be seen as a demand for voluntary utilization of agricultural landscapes in the region. Moreover, as the ratio of designated landscape complexes increases, it becomes evident that farmers at the village level actively participate in agricultural landscape preservation and contribute to providing public value or utilize it as a tourism resource. This highlights the need for managing agricultural landscapes at the village level within the appropriate context.
참고문헌 (29)
- 안필균, "포스트 코로나 시대 관광 트렌드를 반영한 농촌체험마을 조성방안 연구 - 전라북도 완주군 소양면 위봉마을을 사례로 -", 농촌계획, 26(4), pp.27~39 (2020), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- 채혜성, "경관보전 직불제 시범사업 시행 현황 분석 및 개선방안", 농촌계획, 12(4), pp.115~123 (2006), 한국농촌계획학회
- A Study on Rural Landscape Management and Regional action plan, "Choi, J. A.", RDA, ~ (2016)
- Choi, J. A., "Evaluation of Functions of Public Benefit of Rural Landscape based on Landscape Ecology, Buan-gun", Doctoral, pp.2021
- 정철모, "경관농업지구의 활성화를 위한 경관보전 지원제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구", 한국지역개발학회지, 17(3), pp.191~210 (2005), 한국지역개발학회
- 장효선, "경관보전직불제 시범사업의 시행사례 분석및 개선방안 : 봉화군, 청원군, 홍성군 사례를 중심으로", 농촌계획, 13(4), pp.69~77 (2007), 한국농촌계획학회
- 김강섭, "농촌지역 개발정책의 변천과정과 특성에 관한 연구", 한국농촌건축학회논문집, 6(18), pp.25~38 (2004), 한국농촌건축학회
- 김미영, "경관보전직불제사업의 실태분석 및 개선방안", 농촌지도와 개발, 16(4), pp.837~867 (2009), 한국농촌지도학회
- Kim, S. J., "Policy Directions for Rural Land Use Planning System" (2019), KRIHS
- 김용진, "소셜데이터 분석을 통한 포스트 코로나 시대 농촌관광의 변화와 적용방안", 농촌계획, 27(4), pp.43~54 (2021), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- 김용진, "IPA를 활용한 농촌다움에 대한 거주민의 인식 및 평가 - 고창군 지역 리더그룹을 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 28(1), pp.99~108 (2022), 한국농촌계획학회
- 김용진, "모바일 유동인구데이터를 활용한 농촌지역 생활자의 유동특성에 따른 생활권 유형화", 농촌계획, 28(2), pp.61~69 (2022), 한국농촌계획학회
- Kim, Y. J., "Appraisal of Rural Area Based on New Ruralism Perspective: The Case Study of Gochang County using De Facto Population Awareness and Geospatial Data", Doctoral, pp.2023
- 『Urban Planning Status』Statistical Information Report, "Korea Land and Geospatial Informatix Corporation", ~ (2022)
- 이지민, "OECD 인구 기준을 적용한 시군구 단위 농촌의 공간적 범위", 국토계획, 55(4), pp.50~58 (2020), 대한국토·도시계획학회[DOI]
- 이유직, "중요도-만족도 분석을 활용한 경관보전직불제 개선방안", 한국경관학회지, 12(2), pp.154~167 (2020), 한국경관학회
- A Study on the Improvement of the Landscape Conservation Direct Payment System by Reforming the Public Interest Direct Payment System, "Lee, Y. J.", MAFRA, ~ (2020)
- Li, Y., "Why some rural areas decline while some others not : An overview of rural evolution in the world", Journal of Rural Studies, 68, pp.135~143 (2019)
- Lichter, D. T., "Rural America in an Urban Society : Changing Spatial and Social Boundaries", Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), pp.565~592 (2011)
- MAFRA, "Guidelines for Implementing Agri-Food Projects", ~ (2020)
- OECD, "OECD Regional Outlook 2016. Productive Regions for Inclusive Societies" (2016), OECD Publishing
- 박진현, "경관보전직불제에 대한 이해집단간 의식 비교 연구", 농촌계획, 18(3), pp.137~148 (2012), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- 5th Comprehensive National Territorial Plan, "ROKG", ~ (2019)
- 성주인 Seong Joo-In, "농촌경관보전직불제 성과 분석과 발전과제 도출", 농촌관광연구, 15(1), pp.85~112 (2008), 한국농촌관광학회
- Rural Prospects and Planning Strategies on Rural Development(Year 1 of 3), "Shim, J. H.", KREI, ~ (2019)
- 송미령, "농촌경관 보전을 위한 정책 동향과 시사점", 농촌경제, 28(3), pp.121~137 (2005), 한국농촌경제연구원
- A study on the implementation plan of the direct payment system for landscape preservation, "Um, D. H.", Rural Research Institute, ~ (2004)
- Wilson, G. A., "‘Neoproductivist’agriculture : Spatio-temporal versus structuralist perspectives", Journal of Rural Studies, 38, pp.52~64 (2015)
- Zasada, I., "Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming", Land Use Policy, 28(4), pp.639~648 (2011)