정신장애인에 대한 일반인의 스티그마와 정신장애인이 지각하는 스티그마의 비교 연구
A Comparison of Public's Stigma against the Mental Patients and Mental Patients' Perceived Stigma
1
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
Objectives：The purpose of this study is to compare public stigma against mental patients and mental patients’ perceived stigma. Methods：549 members of general populations participated in the survey which included questions regarding prejudice and discrimination against mental mental patients, while 377 mental patients participated in the survey which included questions regarding perceived prejudice, experienced discrimination and a coping orientation to social stigma. Results：The mental patients perceived prejudice more compared to public prejudice toward the mental patients. And they experienced discrimination less compared to public’s practice of discrimination against mental patients. Also mental patients used passive-avoidance coping orientation against social stigma. Conclusion : This study concluded that consumer empowerment program for mental patients is just important as anti-stigma campaign
참고문헌 (13)
- "정신장애인에 대한 사회적 편견", 35, pp.231~261 (1998)
- , 1999, ~, pp.연세대학교
- "정신질환에 대한 일반인의 추적조사", 8, pp.118~132 (1989)
- "The consequencesof stigma for the self esteem of people with mental illness", 52, pp.1621~1626 (2001)
- "Adverse effects of perceived stigma on social adaptationof persons diagnosed with bipolar affective disorder", 52, pp.1627~1632 (2001)
- "지각된 낙인이 정신장애인의 삶의 만족과 자아존중감에 미치는 영향", 56, pp.173~194 (2004)
- "정신분열병 환자의 낙인에 영향을 주는 요인", 41, pp.1185~1196 (2002)
- "Amodified labeling approach to mental disorders:An empirical assessment", 54, pp.400~423 (1989)
- "정신장애인에 대한 사회적 낙인 척도개발", pp.581~593 (2003)
- "The effectiveness of coping orientations", pp.302~320
- "Perceived stigma and patient-related severity of illness aspredictors of antidepressant drug adherence", 52, pp.1615~1620 (2001)
- "Mental illness and the impact ofbelieving others know about it", 77, pp.1~5 (1971)
- "Reconsidering the social rejection of ex-mentalpatients:Levels of attitudinal response", 11, pp.261~273 (1983)