신체화 집단의 자동적 주의편향 : 사건관련전위 연구
Automatic Attentional Bias in Individuals with Somatization Tendencies : An Event-Related Potential Study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine the automatic attentional bias to disease/body-related stimuli in individuals exhibiting somatization tendencies using Event-Related Potential (ERP). Methods The participants were classified according to somatization and control groups based on the somatization symptom scales of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised and Somatosensory Amplification Scale scores. ERP were recorded in the somatization and control groups while participants were performing the task to respond with neutral (standard stimuli) or disease/body-related words (target stimuli). We compared N100, P200, and P300 ERP components between the two groups. Results In the somatization group, the reaction times to disease/body-related words were faster than for neutral words. In ERP analysis, N100 to standard stimuli was not observed in the somatization group. The somatization group showed higher P200 and P300 amplitudes to target stimuli than standard stimuli. On the contrary, in the control group, no difference in P200 and P300 amplitudes was observed between target and standard stimuli. Conclusion It is suggested that individuals exhibiting somatization tendencies have automatic attentional bias to disease/body-related stimuli and interpret disease/body-related stimuli as self-relevant stimuli.
Abstract
Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine the automatic attentional bias to disease/body-related stimuli in individuals exhibiting somatization tendencies using Event-Related Potential (ERP). Methods The participants were classified according to somatization and control groups based on the somatization symptom scales of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised and Somatosensory Amplification Scale scores. ERP were recorded in the somatization and control groups while participants were performing the task to respond with neutral (standard stimuli) or disease/body-related words (target stimuli). We compared N100, P200, and P300 ERP components between the two groups. Results In the somatization group, the reaction times to disease/body-related words were faster than for neutral words. In ERP analysis, N100 to standard stimuli was not observed in the somatization group. The somatization group showed higher P200 and P300 amplitudes to target stimuli than standard stimuli. On the contrary, in the control group, no difference in P200 and P300 amplitudes was observed between target and standard stimuli. Conclusion It is suggested that individuals exhibiting somatization tendencies have automatic attentional bias to disease/body-related stimuli and interpret disease/body-related stimuli as self-relevant stimuli.
참고문헌 (31)
- Cioffi D, "Beyond attentional strategies: cognitive-perceptual model of somatic interpretation", Psychol Bull, 109, pp.25~41 (1991)
- Kirmayer LJ, "Somatoform disorders: personality and the social matrix of somatic distress", J Abnorm Psychol, 103, pp.125~136 (1994)
- Mechanic D, "Social psychologic factors affecting the presentation of bodily complaints", N Engl J Med, 286, pp.1132~1139 (1972)
- Barsky AJ, "Palpitations, cardiac awareness, and panic disorder", Am J Med, 9, pp.31S~34S (1992)
- Barsky AJ, "The somatosensory amplification scale and its relationship to hypochondriasis", J Psychiatr Res, 24, pp.323~334 (1990)
- Salkovskis PM, "Panic disorder and hypochondriasis", Adv Behav Res Ther, 15, pp.23~48 (1993)
- Warwick HM, "A cognitive-behavioural approach to hypochondriasis and health anxiety", J Psychosom Res, 33, pp.705~711 (1989)
- Warwick HM, "Hypochondriasis", Behav Res Ther, 28, pp.105~117 (1990)
- Shin HK, "The inference bias of illness in somatization group", Korean J Clin Psychol, 17, pp.235~246 (1998)
- Polich J, "Clinical application of the P300 event-related brain potential", Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 15, pp.133~161 (2004)
- 박태진, "처리수준에 따른 암묵기억과 외현기억의 신경학적 해리: ERP 연구", 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 15(2), pp.289~301 (2003), 한국인지및생물심리학회
- Kim KI, "Korean Manual of Symptom Checklist-90-Revision" (1989), ChungAng Aptitude Publishing Co
- Won HT, "A study on the cognitive characteristics of somatization (I): the reliability and validity of the Korean versions of Somatosensory Amplification Scale and Symptom Interpretation Questionnaire", Korean J Clin Psychol, 17, pp.33~39 (1998)
- Seo SK, "Yonsei Corpus of Lexical Frequency in Korean Vocabulary" (1998), Institute of Language and Information Studies in Yonsei University
- Gratton G, "A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact", Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 55, pp.468~484 (1983)
- Shin HK., "A study on the cognitive characteristics of somatization (II): The perception, attribution and memory biases of bodily sensations in somatization patients", Korean J Clin Psychol, 17, pp.41~54 (1998)
- 신현균, "청소년의 학업 부담감, 부정적 정서, 감정표현불능증 및 지각된 부모양육행동과 신체화 증상과의 관계", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(1), pp.171~187 (2002), 한국임상심리학회
- Gordon E, "A neurophysiological study of somatization disorder", Compr Psychiatry, 27, pp.295~301 (1986)
- Gordon E, "Auditory evoked response potentials in somatization disorder", J Psychiatr Res, 20, pp.237~248 (1986)
- James L, "Augmentation of auditory evoked potentials in somatization disorder", J Psychiatr Res, 24, pp.155~163 (1990)
- Freunberger R, "Visual P2component is related to theta phase-locking", Neurosci Lett, 426, pp.181~186 (2007)
- Luck SJ, "Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search", Psychophysiology, 31, pp.291~308 (1994)
- Bernat E, "Event-related brain potentials differentiate positive and negative mood adjectives during both supraliminal and subliminal visual processing", Int J Psychophysiol, 42, pp.11~34 (2001)
- Näätänen R, "Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials", Biol Psychol, 14, pp.53~98 (1982)
- Hackley SA, "Cross-modal selective attention effects on retinal, myogenic, brainstem, and cerebral evoked potentials", Psychophysiology, 27, pp.195~208 (1990)
- Kanske P, "Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study", Brain Res, 1148, pp.138~148 (2007)
- Evans KM, "The memory that’s right and the memory that’s left: event-related potentials reveal hemispheric asymmetries in the encoding and retention of verbal information", Neuropsychologia, 45, pp.1777~1790 (2007)
- Thomas SJ, "Event-related potentials during an emotional Stroop task", Int J Psychophysiol, 63, pp.221~231 (2007)
- Squires NK, "Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man", Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 38, pp.387~401 (1975)
- Gray HM, "P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli", J Exp Soc Psychol, 40, pp.216~224 (2004)
- Smith ME, "The intracranial topography of the P3 event-related potential elicited during auditory oddball", Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 76, pp.235~248 (1990)