본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Study on the Economic Impacts of the Korea-Australia Free Trade Agreement

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

In the situation that negotiations for the conclusion of Korea-Australia free trade agreement(FTA) are underway, this study investigated the justification to support the FTA between the two countries. In order to examine the justification of the FTA, firstly, the author used revealed comparative advantage(RCA) and trade specialization index(TSI) methodology, which confirmed a significant, highly complementary trade and industrial structure between the two economies. In the same context, it turned out that bilateral liberalization of trade and investment between Australia and Korea will bring about increased GDP growth and welfare through the combined impacts of improved allocative efficiency, improved productivity growth, enhanced investment flows, and closer economic integration. Thus, although some political perspectives such as agricultural issues operate as an obstacle, it seems desirable for the Korean government to pursue FTA with Australia in an active manner. Moreover, the Korean economy may have to pay high opportunity cost if she neglects pushing forward the FTA with Australia because Australia's conclusion of FTA with other competing countries such as China and Japan may bring about losing the opportunities of market access and stable source of natural resources to the Korean economy.

Abstract

In the situation that negotiations for the conclusion of Korea-Australia free trade agreement(FTA) are underway, this study investigated the justification to support the FTA between the two countries. In order to examine the justification of the FTA, firstly, the author used revealed comparative advantage(RCA) and trade specialization index(TSI) methodology, which confirmed a significant, highly complementary trade and industrial structure between the two economies. In the same context, it turned out that bilateral liberalization of trade and investment between Australia and Korea will bring about increased GDP growth and welfare through the combined impacts of improved allocative efficiency, improved productivity growth, enhanced investment flows, and closer economic integration. Thus, although some political perspectives such as agricultural issues operate as an obstacle, it seems desirable for the Korean government to pursue FTA with Australia in an active manner. Moreover, the Korean economy may have to pay high opportunity cost if she neglects pushing forward the FTA with Australia because Australia's conclusion of FTA with other competing countries such as China and Japan may bring about losing the opportunities of market access and stable source of natural resources to the Korean economy.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Balassa, B., "Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage", Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 33, pp.99~123 (1965)
  2. Balassa, B., "The Changing Pattern of Comparative Advantage in Manufactured Goods", Review of Economics and Statistics, 61, pp.259~66 (1979)
  3. Balassa, B., "The Newly Industrializing Countries in the World Economy", pp.149~167 (1983), Pergamon Press
  4. White Paper on Manufacturing Industry, "Commonwealth of Australia", Department of Industry and Commerce, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, ~ (1997)
  5. Commonwealth of Australia, "Trade Outcomes and objectives Statement" (2001), Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
  6. Commonwealth of Australia, "Winning in World Markets", Meeting the competitive challenge of the new global economy (2008)
  7. Composition of Trade Australia: 2008-09, "Commonwealth of Australia", Market Information and Research Section, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, ~ (2009)
  8. Davis, Hanslow, "Impact of KORUS on Australian Agriculture" (2007), Centre for International Economics
  9. Grubel, H.G., "Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products" (1975), Macmillan
  10. Heckscher, Eli, "The Effects of Foreign Trade on the Distribution of Income", pp.13~ (1949), Readings in the Theory of International Trade, Philadelphia: Blakiston
  11. Australia-Republic of Korea Free Trade Agreement Feasibility Study, "Korea Institute for International Economic Policy", policy analysis, ~ (2008)
  12. Jagdish Bhagwati, "Trading Blocs: Alternative Approaches to Analyzing Preferential Trading Agreements" (1999), MIT Press
  13. Jones, R. W., "Factor Proportions and the Heckscher-Ohlin Model", Review of Economic Studies, 24, pp.1~5 (1956)
  14. Kim, J.H., "Paradigm of Australia's Foreign Economic Policy with Special Reference to International Trade", Duksung Journal of Social Sciences, 14 (2008)
  15. Lancaster, K., "The Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Model: A Geometric Treatment", pp.19~39 (1957), Economica
  16. Economic Statistics, "Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade", Republic of Korea, ~ (2003)
  17. "FTA Status of Korea"[URL]
  18. Ohlin, Bertil, "Interregional and International Trade" (1933), Harvard University Press
  19. Trade and Investment Effects of Preferential Trading Arrangements – Old and New Evidence, "Richard Adams", Australian Productivity Commission, ~ (2003)
  20. Sherman Robinson, "Trade liberalization and regional integration: the search for large numbers", Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 46(4), pp.585~604 (2002)
  21. William J Baumol, "Productivity and American Leadership : The Long View" (1989), MIT Press
  22. World Trade 2007, Prospects for 2008, "World Trade Organization", Secretariat, ~ (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)