본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Attitude Transfer Model in Fashion Co-marketing Alliance: Controlling Product Tangibility/Intangibility

안수경
한국패션비즈니스학회|2011.07|패션 비즈니스 (Journal of Fashion Business)|제15권 제3호|pp. 142-155

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Fashion Co-marketing allianceInformation Integration TheoryAttitude transferProduct tangibility
주제분류생활과학

초록

By developing attitude transfer model, this study examined the co-marketing alliance effect between fashion and other industries (i.e., service and product brands) based upon the information integration theory. In addition, it examined the product tangibility/intangibility effects of partner brands by controlling stimuli: two alliance cases of fashion and service brands and two alliance cases of fashion and product brands. A total of 1,037 Korean women aged 20 to 39 were surveyed to compare the prior- and post- attitudes toward fashion/partner brands under four fictitious co-marketing alliance cases. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), multi-group CFA, structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis, and multi-group SEM analysis were conducted to test the hypotheses. The results demonstrated that the prior-attitude toward fashion brand partially affected the alliance attitude, and the co-marketing alliance was affected by prior-attitudes partner brands. The result of multi-group SEM analysis supported the significant differences between service and product brands as alliance partners, which might refer to the effect of product tangibility, existing in brand alliance contexts. The alliance evaluation affected the subsequent evaluations on each participating brands. This study empirically provides the conceptual structure of how consumer attitudes toward the participating brands interact with the attitudes toward alliance and offer practical insights. Specifically, upon employing the manipulated co-marketing alliances cases, this study demonstrates the partnering effect according to product tangibility of partner brands.

Abstract

By developing attitude transfer model, this study examined the co-marketing alliance effect between fashion and other industries (i.e., service and product brands) based upon the information integration theory. In addition, it examined the product tangibility/intangibility effects of partner brands by controlling stimuli: two alliance cases of fashion and service brands and two alliance cases of fashion and product brands. A total of 1,037 Korean women aged 20 to 39 were surveyed to compare the prior- and post- attitudes toward fashion/partner brands under four fictitious co-marketing alliance cases. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), multi-group CFA, structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis, and multi-group SEM analysis were conducted to test the hypotheses. The results demonstrated that the prior-attitude toward fashion brand partially affected the alliance attitude, and the co-marketing alliance was affected by prior-attitudes partner brands. The result of multi-group SEM analysis supported the significant differences between service and product brands as alliance partners, which might refer to the effect of product tangibility, existing in brand alliance contexts. The alliance evaluation affected the subsequent evaluations on each participating brands. This study empirically provides the conceptual structure of how consumer attitudes toward the participating brands interact with the attitudes toward alliance and offer practical insights. Specifically, upon employing the manipulated co-marketing alliances cases, this study demonstrates the partnering effect according to product tangibility of partner brands.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. ED Lebar, "Brand equity implications of joint branding programs", Journal of Adverting Research, 45(4), pp.413~425 (2005)
  2. Sonia Dickinson, "Evaluation of brand alliances between non-profit and commercial brand partners:the transfer of affect", International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(1), pp.75~89 (2007)
  3. Arthur J.Farkas, "Integration theory and inoculation theory as explanations of the"Paper tiger"effect", The Journal of Social Psychology, 98(2), pp.253~268 (1976)
  4. Norman H.Anderson, "Foundations of Information Integration Theory", pp.55~ (1981), Academic Press
  5. Bernard L.Simonin, "Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes", Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), pp.30~42 (1998)
  6. Barbara A.Lafferty, "The impact of the alliance on the partners:A look at cause-brand alliances", Psychology and Marketing, 21(7), pp.509~531 (2004)
  7. Ahn Sookyoung, "Co-marketing alliances between heterogeneous industries:Examining perceived match-up effects in product,brand and alliance levels", Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(6), pp.477~485 (2009)
  8. Kevin L.Keller, "The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions", Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), pp.35~50 (1992)
  9. Henrik Uggla, "Persons a leader brands:From endorsers to branded houses", The Icfai University Journal of Brand Management, 5(3), pp.7~21 (2008)
  10. Aron M. Levin, "Theoretical and empirical linkages between consumers’ responses to different branding strategies", Advances in Consumer Research, 23(1), pp.296~300 (1996)
  11. Louis P.Bucklin, "Organizing successful co-marketing alliances", Journal of Marketing, 57(2), pp.32~46 (1993)
  12. Arthur J.Farkas, "Integration theory and inoculation theory as explanations of the"Paper tiger"effect", The Journal of Social Psychology, 98(2), pp.253~268 (1976)
  13. Clayton Hillyer, "Effect of cobranding on consumer product evaluations", Advances in Consumer Research, 22(1), pp.123~127 (1995)
  14. Maria Sicilia, "Attitude formation online:How the consumer’s need for cognition affects the relationship between attitude towards the website and attitude towards the brand", International Journal of Marketing Research, 48(2), pp.139~154 (2006)
  15. David.A.Aaker, "Consumer evaluations of brand extensions", Journal of Marketing, 54(1), pp.27~41 (1990)
  16. Aron M.Levin, "Theoretical and empirical linkages between consumers’ responses to different branding strategies", Advances in Consumer Research, 23(1), pp.296~300 (1996)
  17. David.A.Aaker, "The impact of corporate marketing on a company’s brand extension", Corporate Reputation Review, 4(1), pp.356~378 (1998)
  18. Cynthia J.Frey, "Information integration theory:An alternative attitude model for consumer behavior", Advances in Consumer Research, 7(1), pp.350~355 (1980)
  19. Arthur J.Farkas, "Integration theory and inoculation theory as explanations of the"Paper tiger"effect", The Journal of Social Psychology, 98(2), pp.253~268 (1976)
  20. Robert E.Smith, "Integrating information from advertising and trial:Processes and effects on consumer response to product information", Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2), pp.204~219 (1993)
  21. Arthur J.Farkas, "Integration theory and inoculation theory as explanations of the “Paper tiger” effect", The Journal of Social Psychology, 98(2), pp.253~268 (1976)
  22. Bernard L.Simonin, "Bundling as a strategy for new product introduction:Effects on consumers’ reservation prices for the bundle,the new product,and its tie-in", Journal of Business Research, 33(3), pp.219~230 (1995)
  23. Julie A.Ruth, "Brought to you by brand A and brand B", Journal of Advertising, 32(3), pp.19~30 (2003)
  24. Martin Fishbien, "Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research Reading", pp.222~ (1975), Addison-Wesley
  25. Mary R.Zimmer, "The reciprocal effects of extension quality and fit on parent brand attitude", Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13(1), pp.37~46 (2004)
  26. Judith H. Washburn, "Co-branding: Brand equity and trial effects", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(7), pp.591~604 (2000)
  27. Lance Leuthesser, "2+2=5? A framework for using co-branding to leverage a brand", Journal of Brand Management, 11(1), pp.35~47 (2003)
  28. Valalie A.Zeithaml, "Problems and strategies in service marketing", Journal of Marketing, 49(2), pp.33~46 (1985)
  29. Leonard L.Berry, "Service marketing is different", Business, 30(3), pp.24~29 (1980)
  30. Margaret L.Friedman, "Consumer evaluation processes in a service setting", The Journal of Services Marketing, 7(2), pp.47~61 (1993)
  31. G.Lynn Shostack, "Breaking free from product marketing", Journal of Marketing, 41(2), pp.73~80 (1977)
  32. Christopher Lovelock, "Whither services marketing? In search of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives", Journal of service research, 7(1), pp.20~41 (2004)
  33. Roger J.Calantone, "Joint ventures in China: A comparative study of Japanese, Korean, and U.S. partners", Journal of International marketing, 9(1), pp.1~23 (2001)
  34. Felix Mavondo, "Measurement invariance of marketing instruments: An implication across countries", Journal of Marketing Management, 19(5, pp.6) (2003), 523~540
  35. Joseph W.Alba, "Effects of context and partcategory cues on recall of competing brands", Journal of Marketing Research, 22(3), pp.340~349 (1985)
  36. Joseph W.Alba, "Salience Effects in Brand Recall", Journal of Marketing Research, 23(4), pp.363~369 (1986)

관련 논문AI추천

The Impact of Product Involvement on Reciprocal Effect in Co-brandingChia-Lin Lee한국마케팅학회 · 아시아마케팅저널2016 · 제18권 제3호Effects of co-branding on consumers’ purchase intention and evaluation of apparel attributesD. Gloria Wu, Laurence Chalip한국마케팅과학회 · Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구)2014 · 제24권 제1호How Do Emotionally Attached Consumers Evaluate Co-branded Products(NPB Alliance)?: A Comparison between Brand Attitude and Brand Attachment이재진한국상품학회 · 상품학연구2019 · 제37권 제3호패션 브랜드 콜라보레이션의 제품속성이 지각된 가치와 구매의도에 미치는 영향: 인지적 학습이론을 중심으로김현진, 박정근, 현효원한국상품학회 · 상품학연구2020 · 제38권 제4호Art Infusion in Fashion Product: The influence of Visual Art on Product Evaluation and Purchase Intention of Consumers고은주, 김규림, Yang-Im Lee한국마케팅과학회 · Journal of Global Fashion Marketing2012 · 제3권 제4호국제 복합상표 제휴전략: 상표간 보완성, 적합성 및 상표속성 전이성에 관한 실증연구강혁, 권업, 김규정, 조봉진한국마케팅과학회 · Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구)2004 · 제13호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

The Effects of Demographic Factors on Fashion Orientation, Fashion Response, and Buying Criteria(paper no.1)구인숙pp. 1-21A Development of Bodice Pattern for Women Aged 18~24 Years정재은, 이준옥, 박재경pp. 22-31The Effects of Demographic Factors on Children's wear Brand Preference and Their Reasons, and Brand Evaluation (paper no.3)구인숙pp. 32-50An Analysis on the Color Trend of Street Fashion in Dalian, China(paper no.1) - Focused on 2010 Summer -김은실, 배수정pp. 51-66The Color Symbolism of the Costume on Korean Film 「Swiri」 - focused on relations among space, background and costume -박혜원, 박세희pp. 67-83
원문 보기