Effects of force fields for refining protein NMR structureswith atomistic force fields and generalized-Born implicit solvent model
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulation has become mature enabling close approximation of the real behaviors of biomolecules. In biomolecular NMR field, atomistic MD simulation coupled with generalized implicit solvent model (GBIS) has contributed to improving the qualities of NMR structures in the refinement stage with experimental restraints. Here all-atom force fields play important roles in defining the optimal positions between atoms and angles, resulting in more precise and accurate structures. Despite successful applications in refining NMR structure, however, the research that has studied the influence of force fields in GBIS is limited. In this study, we compared the qualities of NMR structures of two model proteins, ubiquitin and GB1, under a series of AMBER force fields¾ff99SB, ff99SB-ILDN, ff99SB-NMR, ff12SB, and ff13¾with experimental restraints. The root mean square deviations of backbone atoms and packing scores that reflect the apparent structural qualities were almost indistinguishable except ff13. Qualitative comparison of parameters, however, indicates that ff99SB-ILDN is more recommendable, at least in the cases of ubiquitin and GB1.
Abstract
Atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulation has become mature enabling close approximation of the real behaviors of biomolecules. In biomolecular NMR field, atomistic MD simulation coupled with generalized implicit solvent model (GBIS) has contributed to improving the qualities of NMR structures in the refinement stage with experimental restraints. Here all-atom force fields play important roles in defining the optimal positions between atoms and angles, resulting in more precise and accurate structures. Despite successful applications in refining NMR structure, however, the research that has studied the influence of force fields in GBIS is limited. In this study, we compared the qualities of NMR structures of two model proteins, ubiquitin and GB1, under a series of AMBER force fields¾ff99SB, ff99SB-ILDN, ff99SB-NMR, ff12SB, and ff13¾with experimental restraints. The root mean square deviations of backbone atoms and packing scores that reflect the apparent structural qualities were almost indistinguishable except ff13. Qualitative comparison of parameters, however, indicates that ff99SB-ILDN is more recommendable, at least in the cases of ubiquitin and GB1.
참고문헌 (23)
- Güntert, P., , European biophysics journal : EBJ, 38, pp.129~ (2009)
- Lopez-Mendez, B, , Journal of the American Chemical Society, 128, pp.13112~ (2006)
- Ikeya, T., , Journal of biomolecular NMR, pp.261~ (2009)
- Schmidt, E., , Journal of the American Chemical Society, 134, pp.12817~ (2012)
- Montelione, G. T., , Structure, 21, pp.1563~ (2013)
- JunGoo Jee, "Unambiguous Determination of Intermolecular Hydrogen Bond of NMR Structure by Molecular Dynamics Refinement Using All-Atom Force Field and Implicit Solvent Model", Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, 31(9), pp.2717~2720 (2010), 대한화학회
- Chen, J., , Journal of the American Chemical Society, 126, pp.16038~ (2004)
- 지준구, "Effects of generalized-Born implicit solvent models in NMR structure refinement", Journal of the Korean Magnetic Resonance Society, 17(1), pp.11~18 (2013), 한국자기공명학회
- JunGoo Jee, "Refinement of Protein NMR Structure under Membrane-like Environments with an Implicit Solvent Model", Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, 30(5), pp.1139~1142 (2009), 대한화학회
- 이정규, "Mussel- and Diatom-Inspired Micropattern Generation of Silica on a Solid Substrate", Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, 34(2), pp.353~354 (2013), 대한화학회
- Güntert, P., , Journal of molecular biology, 273, pp.283~ (1997)
- Case, D. A., , J Comput Chem, 26, pp.1668~ (2005)
- Laskowski, R. A., , Journal of biomolecular NMR, 8, pp.477~ (1996)
- Davis, I. W., , Nucleic acids research, 35, pp.W375~ (2007)
- Cornell, W. D, , Journal of the American Chemical Society, 117, pp.5179~ (1995)
- Hornak, V, , Proteins, 65, pp.712~ (2006)
- Lindorff-Larsen, K, , Proteins, 78, pp.1950~ (2010)
- Li, D. W, , Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 49, pp.6778~ (2010)
- Case, D. A., , University of California, ~ (2012)
- Bax, A, , Curr Opin Struct Biol, 15, pp.563~ (2005)
- Jee, J. G, , The Journal of biological chemistry, 277, pp.1388~ (2002)
- MacKerell, A. D, , The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 102, pp.3586~ (1998)
- Zweckstetter, M., , Nature protocols, 3, pp.679~ (2008)