본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Perception of University Instructors for Designing Online Interactions: Findings from Importance-Performance Analysis

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The aim of the current study was to suggest priorities needed to be considered by university instructors when designing online learning. Based on three types of interactions (learner-content, learner-instructor, and learner-learner interactions) for effective online learning (Moore, 1989), draft questionnaires representing each type of interaction were written. After examining content validity by two Ph.D. experts, the survey was constructed with an Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) form. Data of 133 university instructors were collected online. Results showed that support for designing learner-learner interaction was the priority for improving online learning. In terms of learner-instructor interaction, instructors needed to provide social-emotional support to learners so that learners could have a sense of belonging. For learner-instructor interaction, supporting instructors to monitor the level of understanding was the most highly demanding strategy for online learning. Limitations and suggestions for further studies were discussed.

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to suggest priorities needed to be considered by university instructors when designing online learning. Based on three types of interactions (learner-content, learner-instructor, and learner-learner interactions) for effective online learning (Moore, 1989), draft questionnaires representing each type of interaction were written. After examining content validity by two Ph.D. experts, the survey was constructed with an Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) form. Data of 133 university instructors were collected online. Results showed that support for designing learner-learner interaction was the priority for improving online learning. In terms of learner-instructor interaction, instructors needed to provide social-emotional support to learners so that learners could have a sense of belonging. For learner-instructor interaction, supporting instructors to monitor the level of understanding was the most highly demanding strategy for online learning. Limitations and suggestions for further studies were discussed.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. Anderson, T., "Handbook of distance education", pp.129~144 (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum
  2. 채민정, "대학 오프라인과 온라인 수업의 질, 학습정서, 학습성과 간의 구조적 관계 분석", 교육정보미디어연구, 23(3), pp.523~548 (2017), 한국교육정보미디어학회[DOI]
  3. 조대연, "설문조사를 통한 요구분석에서 우선순위결정 방안 탐색", 교육문제연구, (35), pp.165~187 (2009), 교육문제연구소
  4. "The founder of an untact company is a billionaire; COVID-19 shakes the world economic order" (2020)[URL]
  5. 최은진, "이러닝 환경에서의 상호작용이 학습효과에 미치는 영향에 관한 메타분석", 교육공학연구, 32(1), pp.139~164 (2016), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
  6. Dennen, V. P., "Instructor–learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction", Distance Education, 28(1), pp.65~79 (2007)
  7. Diana, N., "An instructor dashboard for real-time analytics in interactive programming assignments", Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, pp.272~279 (2017)
  8. 도재우, "면대면 수업의 온라인 수업 전환과정에서 발생하는 설계 장애물에 대한 탐색", 교육문화연구, 26(2), pp.153~173 (2020), 교육연구소[DOI]
  9. Grover, S., "Promoting active learning & leveraging dashboards for curriculum assessment in an OpenEdX introductory CS course for middle school", Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale Conference, pp.205~206 (2014)
  10. Seungyeon HAN, "Collaboration in a Web-Based Learning Environment: Opportunities and Challenges", Educational Technology International, 9(2), pp.123~142 (2008), 한국교육공학회
  11. Harasim, L., "Teaching and learning on-line: Issues in computer-mediated graduate courses", Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 16(2), pp.117~135 (1987)
  12. 전영미, "대학 이러닝에서 상호작용 유형에 따른 수업만족도 및 인지된 학업성취도 분석", 인터넷정보학회논문지, 18(1), pp.131~141 (2017), 한국인터넷정보학회[DOI]
  13. Jeong, J. Y, "Direction and examples of AI convergence education", Paper presented in the First AI Convergence Education Forum (2020)
  14. 주영주, "사이버대학에서 인지된 고립감, 조직의 지원, 만족도, 학습지속의향간 구조적 관계 규명", 전자공학회논문지, 49(10), pp.240~250 (2012), 대한전자공학회
  15. Jung, J. S., "Effect analysis of factors related to the learner participation, achievement, and satisfaction in the Web-based online discussion", Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), pp.107~135 (2000)
  16. Kang, M. S, "Development of learners' perceived interaction model and scale between learner and instructor in e-Learning environments", doctor, pp.2009
  17. 김은희, "대학 교수자 이러닝 역량 강화를 위한 교육프로그램 개발 방안 연구", 교육정보미디어연구, 21(4), pp.573~599 (2015), 한국교육정보미디어학회[DOI]
  18. 김인숙, "비대면 실시간 수업에서 교수적 디지털 상상력을 통한 상호작용 경험 분석", 교육공학연구, 36(3), pp.873~904 (2020), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
  19. 김미은, "코로나 19(COVID-19)로 인한 온라인 강의 대체가 간호대학생의 학습동기, 교수와 학생의 상호작용 및 온라인 수업만족도에 미치는 영향", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 20(17), pp.519~541 (2020), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  20. 김승환, "코로나19에 따른 대학 교양체육 실기수업의 온라인 수업 운영과 강사의 어려움에 대한 질적 사례 연구", 한국사회체육학회지, (81), pp.9~26 (2020), 한국사회체육학회[DOI]
  21. Kuo, Y. C., "Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses", The Internet and Higher Education, 20, pp.35~50 (2014)
  22. 권성연, "온라인 학습에서 사회적 실재감과 학습자 특성, 토론효과 및 학습효과 인식, 만족도와의 관계 연구", 교육과학연구, 42(3), pp.55~82 (2011), 교육과학연구소
  23. 이은희, "네트워크 기반 원격수업의 상호작용성 사례 연구", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 21(12), pp.629~643 (2021), 학습자중심교과교육학회
  24. 이지은, "Psychological Distance between Students and Professors in Asynchronous Online Learning, and Its Relationship to Student Achievement & Preference for Online Courses", Educational Technology International, 11(2), pp.123~148 (2010), 한국교육공학회
  25. 이종만, "코로나19 원격 교육에서 외로움과 유튜브 과다사용이 대학생활적응에 미치는 영향에 대한 탐색적 연구", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 20(7), pp.342~351 (2020), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  26. 이지연, "코로나19 시대 온라인 수업의 도전과 과제", 교육공학연구, 36(3), pp.671~692 (2020), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
  27. 이영희, "COVID-19 대응 대학 원격강의 운영 사례 분석을 통한 유형 탐색", 열린교육연구, 28(3), pp.211~234 (2020), 한국열린교육학회[DOI]
  28. 임정훈, "코로나 일상 시대의 대학 비대면 수업을 위한 온라인 수업설계 모형 개발", 교육정보미디어연구, 27(1), pp.281~311 (2021), 한국교육정보미디어학회[DOI]
  29. Lim, C., "A comprehensive design model for interactive web-based instruction", Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), pp.3~24 (1999)
  30. Lim, C., "Possibilities of an online learning community and challenges for its vitalization", Media and Education, 6(1), pp.13~19 (2016)
  31. Lim, C., "Effects of different types of interaction on learning and satisfaction in a Web-based lifelong learning environment", Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), pp.223~246 (2000)
  32. 임철일, "대학에서의 실시간 비대면 수업 유형별 수업설계 전략에 관한 사례연구", 교육공학연구, 37(2), pp.459~488 (2021), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
  33. 임철일, "원격대학 이러닝에 있어서 상호작용 향상을 위한 통합적 접근", 평생학습사회, 2(2), pp.1~22 (2006), 미래원격교육연구원
  34. Lim, J. Y, "The effects of supporting monitoring for socially shared regulation on learning process and outcome in CSCL", doctor, pp.2020
  35. Lim, K. Y., "Systematic review of CSCL research 2012-2018: Comparing South Korean and international research", Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 31(1), pp.5~27 (2020)
  36. 임규연, "웹기반 협력학습에서 참여와 상호작용의 차이에 대한 고찰", 컴퓨터교육학회 논문지, 17(4), pp.69~78 (2014), 한국컴퓨터교육학회[DOI]
  37. Lu, X., "Diversities of learners' interactions in different MOOC courses: How these diversities affect communication in learning", Computers & Education, 151, pp.103873~ (2020)
  38. "Maybe we need to rethink our assumptions about ‘online’ learning"[URL]
  39. Mink, O. G., "Developing and managing open organizations: A model and method for maximizing organizational potential" (1991), Somerset Consulting Group, Inc
  40. Moller, L., "Designing communities of learners for asynchronous distance education", Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(4), pp.115~122 (1998)
  41. Moore, M. G., "Editorial : Three types of interaction", American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), pp.1~7 (1989)
  42. Moore, M. G., "Distance education: New perspectives", pp.19~24 (1993), Routledge
  43. Moore, M. G., "Distance education: A systems view of online learning" (2011), Cengage Learning
  44. Nandi, D., "Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online courses", Distance Education, 33(1), pp.5~30 (2012)
  45. Northrup, P., "A framework for designing interactivity into web-based instruction", Educational Technology, 41(2), pp.31~39 (2001)
  46. The future brought forward by COVID-19, from the era of teaching to the era of learning, "Oh, J.", 1~25 (2020)
  47. "Major universities 'super strong decision' due to COVID-19; Seoul National University and Ewha Womans University decided to offer online lectures for the first semester" (2020)[URL]
  48. "Task bomb & lack of feedback; College students appeal for improvement of online lectures" (2020)[URL]
  49. Rapanta, C., "Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis : Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity", Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), pp.1~23 (2020)
  50. Saba, F., "Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education", American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), pp.36~59 (1994)
  51. Xhakaj, F., "Effects of a teacher dashboard for an intelligent tutoring system on teacher knowledge, lesson planning, lessons and student learning", European conference on technology enhanced learning, pp.315~329 (2017), Springer
  52. Xiao, J, "Learner-content interaction in distance education : The weakest link in interaction research", Distance Education, 38(1), pp.123~135 (2017)
  53. York, C. S., "Interpersonal interaction in online learning:Experienced online instructors' perceptions of influencing factors", Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(4), pp.83~98 (2012)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)