What is Monitored and by Whom in Online Collaborative Learning?: Analysis of Monitoring Tools in Learner Dashboard
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to draw implications for designing online tools to support monitoring in collaborative learning. For this purpose, eighteen research papers exploring learner dashboard and group awareness tools were analyzed. Driving questions for the analysis were 'who monitors whose learning' and 'which learning information is monitored.' The analytical frameworks used for this study included the followings: three modes of co-regulation in terms of who regulates whose learning (self-regulation in collaborative learning, other-regulation, and socially-shared regulation) and four categories of dashboard information in terms of which information is monitored (information about preparation, participation, interaction, and achievement). As a result, five design implications for learner dashboard supporting monitoring were drawn. a) Monitoring tools for collaborative learning should support not a single but multiple targets: learner oneself, peer learners, and the group as a whole. b) When supporting the monitoring of oneself, information about self and peers should be illustrated together so that they can be compared. c) Information on collaborative learning achievement should be provided in terms of the content of knowledge acquired rather than test scores. d) In addition to the information about the interaction between learners, the interaction between learners and learning materials can also be provided. e) There should be differences in a manner when providing the same information to the individual and group level.
Abstract
This study aims to draw implications for designing online tools to support monitoring in collaborative learning. For this purpose, eighteen research papers exploring learner dashboard and group awareness tools were analyzed. Driving questions for the analysis were 'who monitors whose learning' and 'which learning information is monitored.' The analytical frameworks used for this study included the followings: three modes of co-regulation in terms of who regulates whose learning (self-regulation in collaborative learning, other-regulation, and socially-shared regulation) and four categories of dashboard information in terms of which information is monitored (information about preparation, participation, interaction, and achievement). As a result, five design implications for learner dashboard supporting monitoring were drawn. a) Monitoring tools for collaborative learning should support not a single but multiple targets: learner oneself, peer learners, and the group as a whole. b) When supporting the monitoring of oneself, information about self and peers should be illustrated together so that they can be compared. c) Information on collaborative learning achievement should be provided in terms of the content of knowledge acquired rather than test scores. d) In addition to the information about the interaction between learners, the interaction between learners and learning materials can also be provided. e) There should be differences in a manner when providing the same information to the individual and group level.
참고문헌 (58)
- Arnold, K. E., "Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success", Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (2012)
- Bernard, R. M., "A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education", Review of Educational Research, 79(3), pp.1243~1289 (2009)
- Bodemer, D., "Tacit guidance for collaborative multimedia learning", Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), pp.1079~1086 (2011)
- Bodemer, D., "Group awareness in CSCL environments", Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), pp.1043~1045 (2011)
- Bodemer, D., "International handbook of the Learning Sciences", pp.351~358 (2018), Routledge
- Bodily, R., "Review of research on student-facing learning analytics dashboards and educational recommender systems", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(4), pp.405~418 (2017)
- Buder, J., "Group awareness tools for learning: Current and future directions", Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), pp.1114~1117 (2011)
- Buder, J., "Supporting controversial CSCL discussions with augmented group awareness tools", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), pp.123~139 (2008)
- Buder, J., "Selective reading of large online forum discussions: The impact of rating visualizations on navigation and learning", Computers in Human Behavior, 44, pp.191~201 (2015)
- Carroll, J. M., "Notification and awareness: synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(5), pp.605~632 (2003)
- Dado, M., "A review of methodological applications of social network analysis in computer-supported collaborative learning", Educational Research Review, 22, pp.159~180 (2017)
- DiDonato, N. C., "Effective self-and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: An analysis of how students regulate problem-solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks", Instructional Science, 41(1), pp.25~47 (2013)
- Dillenbourg, P., "Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL?", pp.61~91 (2002), Open Universiteit Nederland
- Engelmann, T., "The added value of communication in a CSCL-scenario compared to just having access to the partners’ knowledge and information", Proceedings of the 4th international conference on concept mapping (2010)
- Enyedy, N., "The Cambridge handbook of the Learning Sciences", pp.191~212 (2016), Cambridge University Press
- Erkens, M., "Improving collaborative learning: Guiding knowledge exchange through the provision of information about learning partners and learning contents", Computers & Education, 128, pp.452~472 (2019)
- Erkens, M., "Improving collaborative learning in the classroom: Text mining based grouping and representing", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(4), pp.387~415 (2016)
- Ezzy, D., "Qualitative analysis-Practice and innovation" (2013), Routledge
- Festinger, L., "A theory of social comparison processes", Human Relations, 7(2), pp.117~140 (1954)
- Flavell, J. H., "Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry", American Psychologist, 34(10), pp.906~ (1979)
- Gravill, J., "Self-regulated learning strategies and software training", Information & Management, 45(5), pp.288~296 (2008)
- Hadwin, A., "Handbook of Self-regulation of learning and performance", pp.83~106 (2018), Routledge
- Hundhausen, C. D., "IDE-based learning analytics for computing education: a process model, critical review, and research agenda", ACM Transactions on Computing Education(TOCE), 17(3), pp.11~ (2017)
- Iandoli, L., "Socially augmented argumentation tools: Rationale, design, and evaluation of a debate dashboard", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72(3), pp.298~319 (2014)
- Janssen, J., "Group awareness tools: It’s what you do with it that matters", Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), pp.1046~1058 (2011)
- Janssen, J., "Coordinated computer-supported collaborative learning: Awareness and awareness tools", Educational Psychologist, 48(1), pp.40~55 (2013)
- 진성희, "비동시적 온라인 토론에서 대시보드 유형과 학습자 특성이 교육효과에 미치는 영향", 교육공학연구, 35(2), pp.339~364 (2019), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
- Jivet, I., "Awareness is not enough:pitfalls of learning analytics dashboards in the educational practice", Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning: Data driven approaches in digital education (2017)
- Kimmerle, J., "Group awareness and self-presentation in computer-supported information exchange", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), pp.85~97 (2008)
- 김선연, "협력적 상호작용 집단의 사회연결망 중앙성이 집단 시너지와 학업성취에 미치는 영향", 교육공학연구, 34(3), pp.383~406 (2018), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
- Kirschner, P. A., "From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), pp.213~233 (2018)
- Kreijns, K., "The sociability of computersupported collaborative learning environments", Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), pp.8~22 (2002)
- Kuhn, D., "Thinking together and alone", Educational Researcher, 44(1), pp.46~53 (2015)
- Kwon, K., "The educational impact of metacognitive group coordination in computer-supported collaborative learning", Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), pp.1271~1281 (2013)
- 임규연, "학습자중심 대시보드 설계를 위한 탐색적 연구: 학습정보를 중심으로", 컴퓨터교육학회 논문지, 21(3), pp.35~50 (2018), 한국컴퓨터교육학회[DOI]
- 임규연, "대학생용 타인조절 척도 개발", 교육과학연구, 49(2), pp.1~26 (2018), 교육과학연구소[DOI]
- 임규연, "대학생용 협력적 자기조절 척도의 구성요인 탐색", 교육공학연구, 33(3), pp.567~598 (2017), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
- Lin, J. W., "Fostering self-regulated learning in a blended environment using group awareness and peer assistance as external scaffolds", Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 32(1), pp.77~93 (2016)
- Malmberg, J., "Capturing temporal and sequential patterns of self-, co-, and socially shared regulation in the context of collaborative learning", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, pp.160~174 (2017)
- McCaslin, M., "Educational psychology, social constructivism, and educational practice : A case of emergent identity", Educational Psychologist, 36(2), pp.133~140 (2001)
- McGrath, J. E., "The study of small groups, past, present, and future", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, pp.95~105 (2000)
- McKenna, K. Y. A., "Plan 9 from cyberspace : The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, pp.57~75 (2000)
- Miller, M., "Scripting and awareness tools for regulating collaborative learning : Changing the landscape of support in CSCL", Computers in Human Behavior, 52, pp.573~588 (2015)
- Pifarré, M., "Incidence of group awareness information on students’ collaborative learning processes", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(4), pp.300~317 (2014)
- Puhl, T., "Blending Facebook discussions into seminars for practicing argumentation", Computers in Human Behavior, 53, pp.605~616 (2015)
- Rogat, T. K., "Other-regulation in collaborative groups : Implications for regulation quality", Instructional Science, 42(6), pp.879~904 (2014)
- Schreiber, M., "Knowledge and information awareness for initiating transactive memory system processes of computer-supported collaborating ad hoc groups", Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), pp.1701~1709 (2010)
- Schwendimann, B. A., "Perceiving learning at a glance : A systematic literature review of learning dashboard research", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(1), pp.30~41 (2016)
- Sedrakyan, G., "Linking learning behavior analytics and learning science concepts: designing a learning analytics dashboard for feedback to support learning regulation", Computers in Human Behavior, ~
- Smith, R. H., "Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research", pp.173~200 (2000), Plenum
- Stahl, G., "Fourth international conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 10)", pp.70~77 (2000), Erlbaum
- 성은모, "학습분석학 관점에서 학습자의 자기주도학습 지원을 위한 학습 데이터 탐색 연구", 교육공학연구, 32(3), pp.487~533 (2016), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
- Suthers, D. D., "Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making:A research agenda for CSCL", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, pp.315~337 (2006)
- Tan, J. P. L., "Learner dashboards a double-edged sword? Students’ sense-making of a collaborative critical reading and learning analytics environment for fostering 21st-century literacies", Journal of Learning Analytics, 4(1), pp.117~140 (2017)
- Winne, P. H., "Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives", pp.153~189 (2001), Routledge
- Winne, P. H., "The international handbook of collaborative learning", pp.462~479 (2013), Routledge
- Zimmerman, B. J., "Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview", Educational Psychologist, 25(1), pp.3~17 (1990)
- Zufferey, J. D., "Partner knowledge awareness in knowledge communication: Learning by adapting to the partner", The Journal of Experimental Education, 79(1), pp.102~125 (2010)
