본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effects of Joystick-controlling and Walking-around on Navigating a Virtual Space

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The advancement of virtual reality technology offers various locomotion options that support users’ navigation behaviors in a virtual reality environment. This study was aimed at examining the effects of two navigation methods—joystick-controlling and walking- around—on users’ perceived usability, behavioral engagement, and virtual presence. Fifty South Korean college students were recruited in the study, and they were assigned randomly to one of the two navigation conditions. Participants from each group were asked to observe a 3D object and complete the surveys. They were then asked to repeat the procedure with a 2D image. Using repeated-measures ANOVAs and MANOVA, we found that users using joystick-controlling reported higher usability and showed superior performance to the walking-around group on two tasks. Participants reported a higher behavioral engagement when observing the 2D image. Besides, they perceived a significantly higher virtual presence when observing the 2D image. Finally, we discussed the implications of the findings for the navigation method design.

Abstract

The advancement of virtual reality technology offers various locomotion options that support users’ navigation behaviors in a virtual reality environment. This study was aimed at examining the effects of two navigation methods—joystick-controlling and walking- around—on users’ perceived usability, behavioral engagement, and virtual presence. Fifty South Korean college students were recruited in the study, and they were assigned randomly to one of the two navigation conditions. Participants from each group were asked to observe a 3D object and complete the surveys. They were then asked to repeat the procedure with a 2D image. Using repeated-measures ANOVAs and MANOVA, we found that users using joystick-controlling reported higher usability and showed superior performance to the walking-around group on two tasks. Participants reported a higher behavioral engagement when observing the 2D image. Besides, they perceived a significantly higher virtual presence when observing the 2D image. Finally, we discussed the implications of the findings for the navigation method design.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Aarseth, E., "Virtual worlds, real knowledge : towards a hermeneutics of virtuality", European Review, 9(2), pp.227~232 (2001)
  2. Ben-Eliyahu, A., "Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement : Affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, pp.87~105 (2018)
  3. Bessa, M., "The effects of body position on Reflexive Motor Acts and the sense of presence in virtual environments", Computers & Graphics, 71, pp.35~41 (2018)
  4. Boletsis, C., "The new era of virtual reality locomotion : a systematic literature review of techniques and a proposed typology", Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 1(4), pp.24~ (2017)
  5. Boletsis, C., "VR Locomotion in the new era of virtual reality: An empirical comparison of prevalent techniques", Advances in Human-Computer Interaction (2019)
  6. Borrego, A., "Feasibility of a walking virtual reality system for rehabilitation : objective and subjective parameters", Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 13(1), pp.68~ (2016)
  7. Bozgeyikli, E., "Locomotion in virtual reality for individuals with autism spectrum disorder", Proceedings of the 2016Symposium on Spatial User Interaction, pp.33~42 (2016), ACM
  8. Bozgeyikli, E., "Locomotion in virtual reality for room scale tracked areas", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 122, pp.38~49 (2019)[DOI]
  9. Brade, J., "Being there again-Presence in real and virtual environments and its relation to usability and user experience using a mobile navigation task", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 101, pp.76~87 (2017)
  10. Cardoso, J. C. S., "A survey of real locomotion techniques for immersive virtual reality applications on head-mounted displays", Computers & Graphics, 85, pp.55~73 (2019)[DOI]
  11. Chen, W., "6DoF navigation in virtual worlds: comparison of joystick-based and head-controlled paradigms", Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pp.111~114 (2013), ACM
  12. Darken, R. P., "Handbook of Virtual Environment Technology", pp.1~21 (2001), CRC Press
  13. Dyck, E., "The OctaVis: a VR-device for rehabilitation and diagnostics of visuospatial impairments", PhD, pp.2017
  14. Eccles, J., "Handbook of research on student engagement", pp.133~145 (2012), Springer
  15. Galvan, D. H., "Self-attribution of distorted reaching movements in immersive virtual reality", Computers & Graphics, 76, pp.142~152 (2018)
  16. Hu-Au, E., "Virtual reality in education : a tool for learning in the experience age", International Journal of Innovation in Education, 4(4), pp.215~226 (2017)
  17. Interrante, V., "Distance perception in immersive virtual environments, revisited", Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR 2006), pp.3~10 (2006), IEEE
  18. 김종덕, "양방향TV 사용자 인터페이스디자인의 평가요소 조작화", 디자인학연구, 23(5), pp.115~126 (2010), 한국디자인학회
  19. Kitson, A., "Comparing leaning-based motion cueing interfaces for virtual reality locomotion", Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, pp.73~82 (2017), IEEE
  20. Kitson, A., "Lean into it: exploring leaning-based motion cueing interfaces for virtual reality movement", Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pp.215~216 (2017), IEEE
  21. Kruijff, E., "On your feet!: Enhancing vection in leaning-based interfaces through multisensory stimuli", Proceedings of the 2016Symposium on Spatial User Interaction, pp.149~158 (2016), ACM
  22. Langbehn, E., "Bending the curve : sensitivity to bending of curved paths and application in room-scale VR", IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 23(4), pp.1389~1398 (2017)
  23. Langbehn, E., "Evaluation of locomotion techniques for room-scale VR: Joystick, teleportation, and redirected walking", Laval Virtual: Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference-Laval Virtual, pp.4~ (2018), ACM
  24. Lee, S., "Effects of visual cues and sustained attention on spatial presence in virtual environments based on spatial and object distinction", Interacting with Computers, 20(5), pp.491~502 (2008)
  25. Lim, S., "Virtual reality as a new learning environment", Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), pp.189~209 (1996)
  26. Ling, Y., "The relationship between individual characteristics and experienced presence", Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), pp.1519~1530 (2013)
  27. Monteiro, P., "Application of the steering law top virtual reality walking navigation interfaces", Computers and Graphics, 77, pp.80~87 (2018)
  28. Nabiyouni, M., "Comparing the performance of natural, semi-natural, and non-natural locomotion techniques in virtual reality", Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, pp.3~10 (2015), IEEE
  29. Paes, D., "Immersive environment for improving the understanding of architectural 3D models : Comparing user spatial perception between immersive and traditional virtual reality systems", Automation in Construction, 84, pp.292~303 (2017)
  30. 박소연, "햅틱 디바이스를 활용한 문화유산 가상현실 콘텐츠 개발 - 금산사 콘텐츠 중심으로 -", 한국디자인포럼, (26), pp.245~254 (2010), 한국디자인트렌드학회[DOI]
  31. Putwain, D. W., "Achievement goals, behavioural engagement, and mathematics achievement : A mediational analysis", Learning and Individual Differences, 68, pp.12~19 (2018)
  32. Reyes, M. R., "Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement", Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), pp.700~712 (2012)
  33. Riecke, B. E., "International Conference on Spatial Cognition: Spatial cognition VII", pp.234~247 (2010), Springer
  34. Ruddle, R. A., "The benefits of using a walking interface to navigate virtual environments", ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 16(1), pp.5~ (2009)
  35. 류지헌, "가상현실 학습환경에서 동작기반 인터페이스가 실재감 지각 및 수행에 미치는 효과", 한국교육학연구, 23(1), pp.35~56 (2017), 안암교육학회[DOI]
  36. Schnack, A., "Does the locomotion technique matter in an immersive virtual store environment?-Comparing motion-tracked walking and instant teleportation", Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, pp.102266~ (2021)
  37. Schubert, T., "The experience of presence : Factor analytic insights", Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10(3), pp.266~281 (2001)
  38. Selzer, M. N., "Effects of virtual presence and learning outcome using low-end virtual reality systems", Displays, 59, pp.9~15 (2019)
  39. Shin, D., "How do users experience the interaction with an immersive screen?", Computers in Human Behavior, 98, pp.302~310 (2019)
  40. Silva, G. R., "A questionnaire for measuring presence in virtual environments : factor analysis of the presence questionnaire and adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese", Virtual Reality, 20, pp.237~242 (2016)[DOI]
  41. Skinner, E. A., "A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, pp.493~525 (2009)[DOI]
  42. Topu, F. B., "The effects of guided-unguided learning in 3d virtual environment on students' engagement and achievement", Computers in Human Behavior, 92, pp.1~10 (2019)
  43. Triyason, T., "The impact of screen size toward QoE of cloud-based virtual desktop", Procedia Computer Science, 111, pp.203~208 (2017)
  44. Vasalampi, K., "Assessment of students' situation-specific classroom engagement by an InSitu Instrument", Learning and Individual Differences, 52, pp.46~52 (2016)
  45. Witmer, B. G., "Measuring presence in virtual environments : A presence questionnaire", Presence : Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), pp.225~240 (1998)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)