본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Development of a Structured Debriefing for Business Simulation Games and Its Effect on College Students' Business Knowledge and Entrepreneurship Competencies

김유경|황현우|이지은
한국교육공학회 (Korean Society Of Educational Technology)|2024.04|Educational Technology International|제25권 제1호|pp. 93-127|DOI https://doi.org/10.23095/ETI.2024.25.1.093

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

business simulation gamestructured debriefingbusiness knowledgeentrepreneurship competence
주제분류교육학

초록

This study evaluates the effect of structured debriefing for a business simulation game for university students. The program provides an authentic learning experience of real-world business management by allowing learners to make decisions related to R&D, marketing, production, and finance through a business simulation game, and check the results in real time. In 2022, University A and B each ran a business simulation game-based program as an extra-curricular activity. University A conducted a traditional instructor-led debriefing where the instructor explained the summarized process and results, while University B implemented a structured debriefing which had been developed based on Gibbs’ and 3D models. To assess the effect of the structured debriefing compared to the traditional instructor-led debriefing, business knowledge and entrepreneurship competencies were measured three times. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to test for the differences between the two groups and to examine interaction effects between group and time. The structured debriefing group achieved statistically significantly higher academic scores than the traditional instructor-led debriefing group at the post-test and in 2 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of entrepreneurship competencies. There was no interaction effect between group and time, both in academic achievement and in entrepreneurship competencies. In conclusion, the simulation game-based program integrated with the structured debriefing session is more likely to have a stronger impact on academic achievement and its retention.

Abstract

This study evaluates the effect of structured debriefing for a business simulation game for university students. The program provides an authentic learning experience of real-world business management by allowing learners to make decisions related to R&D, marketing, production, and finance through a business simulation game, and check the results in real time. In 2022, University A and B each ran a business simulation game-based program as an extra-curricular activity. University A conducted a traditional instructor-led debriefing where the instructor explained the summarized process and results, while University B implemented a structured debriefing which had been developed based on Gibbs’ and 3D models. To assess the effect of the structured debriefing compared to the traditional instructor-led debriefing, business knowledge and entrepreneurship competencies were measured three times. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to test for the differences between the two groups and to examine interaction effects between group and time. The structured debriefing group achieved statistically significantly higher academic scores than the traditional instructor-led debriefing group at the post-test and in 2 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of entrepreneurship competencies. There was no interaction effect between group and time, both in academic achievement and in entrepreneurship competencies. In conclusion, the simulation game-based program integrated with the structured debriefing session is more likely to have a stronger impact on academic achievement and its retention.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. Ahn, M., "A systematic literature review of gamebased learning and educational gamification design research trends in korea", Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 26(3), pp.425~454 (2020)
  2. Bacigalupo, M., "Entrecomp: The entrepreneurship competence frameworks" (2016), Publication Office of the European Union
  3. Ben-Zvi, T., "Applying Bloom's revised taxonomy in business games", Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 35, pp.265~272 (2008)
  4. Bian, J., "The relationship between satisfaction of educational experience and entrepreneurial intention : Focusing on the mediating effect of entrepreneurship competence and differences in college affiliated groups", Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society, 16(4), pp.112~140 (2021)
  5. Boet, S., "Looking in the mirror : self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises", Critical Care Medicine, 39(6), pp.1377~1381 (2011)
  6. Boet, S., "Within-team debriefing versus instructor-led debriefing for simulation-based education : A randomized controlled trial", Annals of Surgery, 258(1), pp.53~58 (2013)
  7. Choi, H., "Comparison of clinical competence, problem-solving, self-efficacy and satisfaction of self and peer-led debriefing in simulation nursing education", Korean Association for Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 23(11), pp.339~351 (2023)
  8. Decker, S., "Healthcare simulation standards of best practiceTM The debriefing process", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 58, pp.27~32 (2021)
  9. "CHI'11 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems", 2011, ~
  10. Dreifuerst, K. T., "Using debriefing for meaningful learning to foster development of clinical reasoning in simulation", Journal of Nursing Education, 51(6), pp.326~333 (2012)
  11. Eun, Y., "Effects of the Lasater's clinical rubric of debriefing in advanced cardiovascular life support training", The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(4), pp.516~527 (2016)
  12. Fanning, R. M., "The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning", Simulation in Healthcare, 2(2), pp.115~125 (2007)
  13. Flanagan, B., "Debriefing : theory and techniques", Manual of Simulation in Healthcare, 155, pp.70~ (2008)
  14. Fraser, K., "Temporal pattern of emotions and cognitive load during simulation training and debriefing", Medical Teacher, 41(2), pp.184~189 (2019)
  15. Garris, R., "Games, motivation, and learning : A research and practice model", Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), pp.441~467 (2002)
  16. Gibbs, G., "Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods" (1988), Further Education Unit
  17. Ha, E., "The effects of structured self-debriefing using on the clinical competency, self-efficacy, and educational satisfaction in nursing students after simulation", The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 21(4), pp.444~453 (2015)
  18. INACSL Standards Committee, "INACSL standards of best practice:SimulationSM debriefing", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(S), pp.S21~S25 (2016)
  19. Jansson, M. M., "Effects of simulation education on oral care practices–a randomized controlled trial", Nursing in Critical Care, 22(3), pp.161~168 (2017)
  20. Jansson, M. M., "Longitudinal effects of single-dose simulation education with structured debriefing and verbal feedback on endotracheal suctioning knowledge and skills : a randomized controlled trial", American Journal of Infection Control, 45(1), pp.83~85 (2017)
  21. Jeong, K., "Effect of debriefing based on the clinical judgment model on simulation-based learning outcomes of end-of-life care for nursing students : A non-randomized controlled trial", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 47(6), pp.842~853 (2017)
  22. Kim, E., "Nursing students' perceptions of meaning, response, and effective methods for debriefing in simulation-based education", Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing, 24(1), pp.51~59 (2017)
  23. Kim, N., "The effects of debriefing utilizing the clinical judgment model in simulation-based korean advanced life support training for nursing students", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 24(8), pp.32~43 (2023)
  24. Kim, S., "Design and implementation of socket-based multi-player game service for elementary mathematics learning", Journal of Service Research and Studies, 6(2), pp.175~184 (2016)
  25. Kim, S., "An empirical study on the educational effects and success factors of a business simulation game", Korean Business Education Review, 31(6), pp.281~309 (2016)
  26. Kim, S., "An empirical study on the educational effect of business simulation game", Information Systems Review, 8(2), pp.173~188 (2016)
  27. Kim, Y., "A study on the success factors and development methodology for educational business simulation games", doctor, pp.2016
  28. Kolb, D. A., "Experiential learning as sources of learning and development" (1984)
  29. Kriz, W. C., "A systemic-constructivist approach to the facilitation and debriefing of simulations and games", Simulation & Gaming, 41(5), pp.663~680 (2010)
  30. Lacruz, A. J., "Debriefing's influence on learning in business game : An experimental design", Brazilian Business Review, 15, pp.192~208 (2018)
  31. Lapum, J. L., "Self-debriefing in virtual simulation", Nurse Educator, 44(6), pp.E6~E8 (2019)
  32. Lasater, K., "Clinical judgment development : Using simulation to create an assessment rubric", Journal of Nursing Education, 46(11), pp.496~503 (2007)
  33. Lasater, K., "Clinical judgement : The last frontier for evaluation", Nurse Education in Practice, 11(2), pp.86~92 (2011)
  34. Lee, K., "The effects of applying debriefing for meaningful learning(DML)in simulation education", Journal of the Society of Next Generation Convergence Technology, 6(2), pp.369~338 (2022)
  35. Lee, J., "Debriefing methods and learning outcomes in simulation nursing education : A systematic review and meta-analysis", Nurse Education Today, 87, pp.104345~ (2020)
  36. Mariani, B., "Structured debriefing and students' clinical judgment abilities in simulation", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(5), pp.147~155 (2013)
  37. Morse, K. J., "Structured model of debriefing on perspective transformation for NP students", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(3), pp.172~179 (2015)
  38. Moreno-Ger, P., "Educational game design for online education", Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), pp.2530~2540 (2008)
  39. Oh, Y., "Effects of a transformative learning theory based debriefing in simulation : A randomized trial", Nurse Education in Practice, 50, pp.102962~ (2021)
  40. O'donnell, J., "Structured and supported debriefing" (2009), American Heart Association
  41. Peters, V., "A simple classification model for debriefing simulation games", Simulation & Gaming, 35(1), pp.70~84 (2004)
  42. Rudolph, J. W., "Debriefing as formative assessment : Closing performance gaps in medical education", Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), pp.1010~1016 (2008)
  43. Sheckley, B., "Trio: An emerging model of adult professional learning", Adult Education Research Conference (2008), University of Missouri
  44. Son, H., "Effects of team-based debriefing in simulation on clinical judgement, critical thinking and learning satisfaction of undergraduate health profession students", Korean Journal of Safety Culture, (19), pp.143~154 (2022)
  45. Song, C., "The effects of peer-led group debriefing utilizing video recording for simulation education on clinical performance, satisfaction on simulation session and debriefing", The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(15), pp.781~792 (2021)
  46. Song, T., "Effectiveness of debriefing in simulation-based education for nursing students : A systematic review and meta-analysis", The Korean Journal of Fundamentals of Nursing, 29(4), pp.399~415 (2022)
  47. Spencer, L. M., "Competence at work: Models for superior performance" (1993)
  48. Tovar, E., "EntreCom4ALL MODEL to sustain the entrepreneurship competence needs", 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (2020)
  49. Van Der Meij, H., "Does individual or collaborative self-debriefing better enhance learning from games?", Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), pp.2471~2479 (2013)
  50. Verkuyl, M., "Comparison of debriefing methods after a virtual simulation : An experiment", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 19, pp.1~7 (2018)
  51. Wotton, K., "Third-year undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of high-fidelity simulation", Journal of Nursing Education, 49(11), pp.632~639 (2010)
  52. Yun, J., "Development and effect of collaborative-based reflection debriefing of virtual simulation in nursing practice education", doctor, pp.2020
  53. Yun, J., "Effects of debriefing method of simulation nursing practical education; systematic review", Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 23(10), pp.593~604 (2022)
  54. Zigmont, J. J., "How paramedics learn: The role of experience, mental models, and analogical reasoning", pp.2010
  55. Zigmont, J. J., "The 3D model of debriefing : Defusing, discovering, and deepening", Seminars in Perinatology, 35(2), pp.52~58 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

구조화된 디브리핑을 적용한 기업경영 시뮬레이션 프로그램의 효과성 및 학습경험 분석: G대학 사례를 기반으로김유경, 이지은한국교육방법학회 · 교육방법연구2023 · 제35권 제3호경영시뮬레이션게임을 활용한 문제중심학습(PBL) 기반의 창업교육 사례 연구김영천한국창업학회 · 한국창업학회지2017 · 제12권 제2호교육용 경영 시뮬레이션 게임의 개발 방법에 관한 연구김공수, 김상수, 이영민, 정대호, 최은지한국기업교육학회 · 기업교육과인재연구2010 · 제12권 제2호Simulation Game-Based Learning for Middle School Students’ Academic Emotions and Learning Achievement임규연, 정윤하한국교육공학회 · Educational Technology International2016 · 제17권 제2호The Effectiveness of Global Start-up Education Program Experience이에스더중소기업융합학회 · 융합정보논문지2019 · 제9권 제6호The Triangulation Model Distribution of Entrepreneurship Education, Entrepreneurship Knowledge, and Entrepreneurship MindsetMOHAMAD Norhidayah binti, MOHD Othman bin, RUSTIANA RUSTIANA한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2022 · 제20권 제9호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)

Using topic modeling-based network visualization and generative AI in online discussions, how learners' perception of usability affects their reflection on feedback이현우, 장민경pp. 1-25Predicting Learning Achievements with Indicators of Perceived Affordances Based on Different Levels of Content Complexity in Video-based Learning정겨운, 김다솜pp. 27-65A Study on the Effectiveness of LMS for Improving College Student’s Mathematics Performance using a Propensity Score Matching Method부선영, 박희주, 류지훈pp. 67-92Analysis of Changes in University Students’ Awareness of Online Classes from 2020 to 2022 during the COVID-19강수미, 성은모pp. 129-159
원문 보기