연구개발투자와 특허경영의 인과구조
A Causal Relationship between R&D Investmentand Patents Management
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
연구개발 활동에 의한 기술혁신과 특허경영을 통한 기업의 지식자산의 확보가 기업의 경쟁력 강화와 지속가능한 성장에 핵심성공요소로 인식됨에 따라 연구개발 활동과 특허경영은 기업경영활동에 있어 주요한 정책적 의사결정 변수로 대두되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 기존의 선형적 기술혁신모형의 한계를 극복하고 전체적인 관점에서 연구개발투자와 특허전략경영 간의 상호 동태적이고 순환적 인과구조 분석을 통해 연구개발 투자와 특허경영 그리고 기업의 지속적 성장모형을 크게 두 가지 관점에서 분석하고 있다. 첫째, 기업의 기술혁신을 위한 출발점은 연구개발 투자이고, 연구개발 활동을 통해 기술지식이나 특허와 같은 무형자산이 증가된다. 또한 연구개발을 통해 증가된 기술지식인 특허가 제품으로 구현화되는 과정에서 기업의 가치를 증가시키는 가치혁신을 가져온다. 둘째, 연구개발 투자를 통해 다수의 핵심특허나 표준특허의 획득은 특허의 판매를 통한 적극적인 이익 증가를 가져오고, 또한 기업의 특허관련 협상력을 증가시켜 특허협상이나 특허소송에서 유리한 고지를 점하게 하여 특허지출 감소를 통한 기술무역수지를 증가시키는 효과를 가져 온다. 또한 핵심특허의 획득을 통해 유사한 특허보유 관련기업들 간의 카르텔을 형성하여 후발기업의 시장진입을 견제하거나 특허를 판매함으로서 추가적인 이익을 증가시키는 인과구조를 제시하였다. 본 연구에서는 최근 들어 중요해지고 있는 기업의 전략적 특허경영의 인과 구조를 제시하고 있으며, 기업의 특허전략과 관련하여 연구개발 투자, 특허경영, 특허의 시장 효과 그리고 기업의 이익 창출과 재투자의 순환적인 프로세스를 제시하고 있다.
Abstract
Recently, both technology innovation by R&D investment and securing intellectual property by patent management have become core components for a company’s sustainable growth, therefore, R&D investment and patent management are major variables for a company when making primary decisions for their business activities. Using reciprocal-feedback analysis, this paper explains how R&D investment would accumulate knowledge in technology which would in turn affect patent creations, and the number of patents could also raise the company’s profit by enhancing the company’s performance in mid-long term business activities. The results of this process show that surplus profits would be reinvested in R&D. The objective of this paper is to find the efficiency-oriented operation in R&D and improve the capabilities of company’s patent management by utilizing the accumulated knowledge and controlling the limiting factors in both internal and external resources. This research attempts to use the new conceptual structure based on the theory of dynamic technology innovation throughout the causal loop diagram (CLD) analysis and reviews the feedback process of strategic patent management. This research would help to construct strategic policies to be used in the business field. It also reveals the efficient patent management process by investigating the reciprocal relationship between R&D strategies and innovation strategies. This paper will approach in a strategic way how to regard to the company's patent management with the variables related to this process by providing a feedback process of technological innovation and patent management. It will also suggest a way to find an optimized way of patent management with the specific tactical strategies to be performed in the field. In order for the company to take a winning position in the market, they should make a plan with a strategy to utilize the efficient patent management to strengthen their core competitiveness. To carry out strategic patent management to improve the company’s core competencies in intellectual property, the success factors can be mainly divided into two parts, one aspect is the company’s willingness to perform patent management and other is the government’s intention to support the company with technology. First, as this paper mentioned earlier, active R&D investment for developing both key patents and the standardization of patents is the first step for improving patent competencies for the company's benefit. By setting a standard for measuring patents, the company can protect their intellectual property from the patent disputes within the industry. Also, thorough market research is a significant factor to prevent patent disputes. Second, it is crucial to construct a patent portfolio by investing in R&D, which would bring both qualitative and quantitative improvement. One of the ways to improve the level of its quality and stimulate to practice active uses of patents are creating patents which are suitable for industry standards, then, the company should produce products and services from their patent pools. Third, getting international recognition is also key for preventing patent disputes in the domestic market. If the patents are certified internationally, the company would have a definite advantage in lawsuits in the domestic market. Additionally, possessing a majority of the patents related to their field compared with their competitors is also advantageous for a company. The role of government and subsidiary organizations related to patents is also important in the active practice of strategic patent management within a company’s system, Especially, small & medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face difficulties to set up a patent management system due to insufficient budgets. The government should grant funds to vitalize construction of a patent system for technology improvement. By providing a variety of information related to specialized patents, SMEs could increase their assets by transferring unworthy technologies to valuable intellectual property. This system could also help stimulate SMEs to create new patents . Accordingly, this paper mainly analyzed how R&D investment affects the patent management system for sustainable growth. This research focused on two different perspectives based on previous studies of R&D investment, technology innovation, and patents which have been improved from this study. First, technology innovation starts from R&D investment, and then the R&D activities increases intangible assets like intellectual property such as knowledge and patents. These intangible assets would stimulate process innovation by improve productivity so that the company can react faster to customer’s needs while maintaining outstanding quality and lowering product cost. Increasing intangible assets would also stimulate product innovation, which would enable the company to launch innovative products which would increase market share. The result of this process increases the company’s net profits, which enables companies to be sustainable. This process explains that the excess profits from technology innovation would induce beneficial circular process by reinvesting the profits for further R&D research and improvement. This technology innovation creates the following cycle:, R&D investment → accumulate knowledge in technology or patents → product innovation → process innovation → produce the new product/service → increase the company’s profit → reinvesting profits in R&D. Therefore, it proves that increased knowledge in technology through innovation, which can be explained as the ‘patent’, would increase the firm’s value. Second, patents achieved by R&D activities can be protected by law, so that the company can expect additional profits by controlling market entry by restricting imitations from competitors. Acquiring many of the key and standard patents through R&D investment would also bring about an increase in profits. These profits also increase the company’s bargaining power in regards to patents by allowing the company to take the advantageous position in patent disputes or lawsuits. Since the company has the bargaining power in patents, it could minimize their costs within those activities. Also, they can also form a cartel with enterprises that have similar patents, so they can put a check on new company or product entries, or earn additional profits by selling the company owned patents to others. The key point of this paper is to provide a reciprocal feedback structure of strategic patent management, which is a significant issue to operate a company. In detail, it shows a beneficial circular process in regards to a patent strategy that starts from R&D investment, to patent management, to market effects of patents, to create profits, to re-investment in R&D resources. Although previous studies analyzed the relationship between R&D and technology innovation in a fragmentary or static way such as explaining R&D investment itself, stating the value of patents, or indicating a firm’s performance, this paper describes R&D investment with feedback analysis with an expanded perspective to overcome the limitations of existing studies.
참고문헌 (43)
- 교육과학기술부, "기술무역통계조사" (2008), 교육과학기술부
- 김영조, "중소기업의 기술협력 활동이 기술혁신 성과 및 재무성과에 미치는 영향*-부산지역 중소 제조업체를 대상으로-", 중소기업연구, 27(3), pp.123~154 (2005), 한국중소기업학회
- 길상철, "특허경영이 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 국내 금속기업 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 11(2), pp.171~193 (2008), 한국기술혁신학회
- 김태기, "기업의 연구개발투자가 특허에 미치는 영향: 한국 제조업기업을 대상으로", 기술혁신연구, 12(1), pp.1~24 (2004), 기술경영경제학회
- 박선영, "특허분석을 통한 기술혁신과 기업성과의 관계분석", 기술혁신학회지, 9(1), pp.1~25 (2006), 한국기술혁신학회
- 삼성경제연구소, "심화되는 특허경쟁과 전략적 대응", CEO Information (2001)
- 삼성경제연구소, "특허분쟁 대응과 기술유출방지", CEO Information (2010)
- 성태경, "기업규모와 기술혁신활동의 연관성: 우리나라 제조업에 대한 실증적 연구", 중소기업연구, 25(2), pp.305~326 (2003), 한국중소기업학회
- 성웅현, "지식재산 투자와 관리가 기업의 무형자산가치에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구", 기술혁신학회지, 12(2), pp.291~311 (2009), 한국기술혁신학회
- 연태훈, "특허의 가치에 대한 시장의 평가", 한국개발연구, 26(2), pp.63~104 (2004), 한국개발연구원
- 이동석, "우리나라 중소기업의 기술혁신능력과 기술사업화능력이 경영성과에 미치는 영향연구", 중소기업연구, 32(1), pp.65~87 (2010), 한국중소기업학회
- 이기환, "특허 활동이 경영성과에 미치는 영향-벤처기업 대 일반기업, 과학기술정책연구원 정책자료", 67~100 (2006)
- 이원영, "특허 데이터베이스를 활용한 기술-산업간 연계구조 분석과 한국 기업의 특허 전략 평가" (2004), 과학기술정책연구원
- 전성희, "중소기업 기술혁신개발사업과 경제성과", 중소기업연구, 28(3), pp.217~241 (2006), 한국중소기업학회
- 최강화, "시스템 다이나믹스를 이용한 기술혁신의 동태성 분석", 경영과학, 23(1), pp.87~113 (2006), 한국경영과학회
- 하정훈, "우리나라 연구개발투자와 경제성장의 관계분석", R&D Focus (2009), 한국과학기술평가원
- 한국산업기술진흥협회 조사연구팀, "기업의 특허경영실태 조사" (2007), KOITA
- 한국산업기술진흥협회 조사연구팀, "2009년 기업의 연구개발투자 및 연구인력 동향과 전망" (2009), KOITA
- 한국산업기술진흥협회 조사연구팀, "기술무역현황 및 정책적 시사점-기술무역 실태조사 결과 중심으로" (2009), KOITA
- Arora, A, "R&D and the patent premium", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26(5), pp.1153~1179 (2008)
- Cohen, W. M, "Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D", Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, 99(397), pp.569~596 (1989)
- Cohen, W. M, "Protecting their Intellectual Assets : Appropriability Conditions and Why U. S. Manufacturing Firms Patent(or Not)", NBER Working Paper, 75(52) (2000)
- Erkal, N, "Cooperative R&D under uncertainty with free entry", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28, pp.74~85 (2010)
- Ernst, H, "Patenting Strategies in the German Mechnical Engineering Industry and Their Relationship to Company Performance", Technovation, 15(4), pp.225~240 (1995)
- Ernst, H, "Success Factors of New Product Development A Review of the Empirical Literature", International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(1), pp.1~40 (2002)
- Feldman, M. P, "The Economics of Science and Technology : An Overview of Initiatives to Foster Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth, Boston" (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Foray, D, "Economics of Knowledge" (2004), MIT Press
- Fershtman, C, "Patents, imitation and licensing in an asymmetric dynamic R&D race", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(2), pp.113~126 (2010)
- Griliches, Z, "Patents Statistics as Economic Indicators : A survey", Journal of Economic Literature, 8(4), pp.1661~1707 (1990)
- Hall, B. H, "The Patent Paradox Revisited", RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), pp.101~128 (2001)
- Hall, B. H, "Does the Market Value R&D Investment by European Firms? Evidence from a Panel of Manufacturing Firms in France, German", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24, pp.971~993 (2006)
- The Market Value of Patent and R&D : Evidence from European Firms, "Hall, B. H", ~, pp.NBER Working Paper Series, No. 13426 (2007)
- Harhoff, D, "Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights", Research Policy, 32(8), pp.1343~1363 (2003)
- Kim, S., W, "A Dynamic Analysis of Technological Innovation Using System Dynamics", POMS 20th Anual Conference (2009)
- Mukherjee, A, "Patents and R&D with imitation and licensing", Economics Letters, 93, pp.196~201 (2006)
- Comparing the Value Relevance of R&D Reporting in Germany : Standard and Selection Effects, "Ramb, F", Social Science Research Network, ~ (2005)
- Rassenfosse, G. D, "A policy insight into the R&D-patent relationship", Research Policy, 38(5), pp.779~792 (2009)
- Rivette, K. G, "Rembrandts in the Attic : Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents" (2000), Harvard Business School Press
- Sakakibara, M, "Measuring the impact of US research consortia", Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(2, pp.3) (2003), 51~69
- Stamboulis, Y, "Modeling the Product-Process R&D Dynamics", Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society (2002)
- Toivanen, O, "Innovation and the Market Value of UK Firms, 1989~1995", Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64, pp.39~61 (2002)
- Tong, X, "Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data", Research Policy, 23(2), pp.133~141 (1994)
- Ulrich, L, "The role of corporate technology strategy and patent portfolios in low-, medium-and high -technology firms", Research Policy, 38, pp.559~569 (2009)
