본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

온라인 패션 쇼핑 시 도전감의 척도 개발 및 타당성 연구

Perceived challenges in fashion shopping online:Scale development and validation

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류생활과학

초록

The purpose of this study is to develop a multi-dimensional scale measuring consumers’ perceived challenge in shopping fashion products online, and to verify its validity and reliability. Relevant literature is first reviewed to identify possible dimensions of perceived challenge. Next, Study 1 is conducted in order to explore the dimensions empirically and to see whether the dimensions that emerged were consistent with prior findings. A total of 190 responses to an open-ended question was qualitatively analyzed by using content analysis. The findings of Study 1 generate 26 items reflecting four dimensions (i.e., product knowledge, previous experience, website functionality, and product availability), which correspond to the dimensions suggested in literature review. Study 2 is subsequently conducted to refine the items so that the perceived challenge scale establishes cross-validation, convergent validity, discriminant validity, reliability, and predictive validity. A total of 238 responses is quantitatively analyzed by using exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation mo- deling. In the results of Study 2, the perceived challenge scale is found to consist of a total of 16 items reflecting three dimensions: E-commerce Challenge (corresponding to Previous Experience reported in Study 1), Retailer Challenge (corresponding to Website Functionality), and Product Challenge (corresponding to Product Knowledge); all Product Availability items have been eliminated through the item refinement process. Specifically, E-commerce Challenge and Retailer Challenge are found to predict flow, supporting flow theory, while Product Challenge fails to lead to flow significantly. Implications, limitations, and suggestions for future studies are also discussed.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a multi-dimensional scale measuring consumers’ perceived challenge in shopping fashion products online, and to verify its validity and reliability. Relevant literature is first reviewed to identify possible dimensions of perceived challenge. Next, Study 1 is conducted in order to explore the dimensions empirically and to see whether the dimensions that emerged were consistent with prior findings. A total of 190 responses to an open-ended question was qualitatively analyzed by using content analysis. The findings of Study 1 generate 26 items reflecting four dimensions (i.e., product knowledge, previous experience, website functionality, and product availability), which correspond to the dimensions suggested in literature review. Study 2 is subsequently conducted to refine the items so that the perceived challenge scale establishes cross-validation, convergent validity, discriminant validity, reliability, and predictive validity. A total of 238 responses is quantitatively analyzed by using exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation mo- deling. In the results of Study 2, the perceived challenge scale is found to consist of a total of 16 items reflecting three dimensions: E-commerce Challenge (corresponding to Previous Experience reported in Study 1), Retailer Challenge (corresponding to Website Functionality), and Product Challenge (corresponding to Product Knowledge); all Product Availability items have been eliminated through the item refinement process. Specifically, E-commerce Challenge and Retailer Challenge are found to predict flow, supporting flow theory, while Product Challenge fails to lead to flow significantly. Implications, limitations, and suggestions for future studies are also discussed.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Brian J. Baldus, "Online brand community engagement: Scale development and validation", Journal of Business Research, 68(5), pp.978~985 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  2. Gilbert A. Churchill, "A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs", Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), pp.64~ (1979), JSTOR[DOI]
  3. Conway, J. M., "A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research", Organizational Research Methods, 6(2), pp.147~168 (2003)[DOI]
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Flow : The psychology of optimal experience" (1991), Harper Perennial
  5. Qingji Fan, "The impact of web site quality on flow‐related online shopping behaviors in C2C e‐marketplaces", Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 23(5), pp.364~387 (2013), Emerald[DOI]
  6. Andrew M. Farrell, "Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009)", Journal of Business Research, 63(3), pp.324~327 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  7. Claes Fornell, "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39~ (1981), JSTOR[DOI]
  8. Jie Gao, "Understanding online purchase decision making: The effects of unconscious thought, information quality, and information quantity", Decision Support Systems, 53(4), pp.772~781 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  9. David W. Gerbing, "An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment", Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), pp.186~ (1988), JSTOR[DOI]
  10. Yi Maggie Guo, "Antecedents of flow in online shopping: a test of alternative models", Information Systems Journal, 19(4), pp.369~390 (2009), Wiley-Blackwell[DOI]
  11. Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis" (2010), Prentice Hall
  12. Donna L. Hoffman, "Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations", Journal of Marketing, 60(3), pp.50~ (1996), JSTOR[DOI]
  13. Donna L. Hoffman, "Flow Online: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects", Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(1), pp.23~34 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  14. Chia-Lin Hsu, "An empirical analysis of the antecedents of e-satisfaction and e-loyalty: focusing on the role of flow and its antecedents", Information Systems and e-Business Management, 11(2), pp.287~311 (2013), Springer Nature[DOI]
  15. Li‐tze Hu, "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives", Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), pp.1~55 (1999), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  16. Jackson, S. A., "Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience : The flow state scale", Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18(1), pp.17~35 (1996)
  17. Kaiser, H. F., "An index of factorial simplicity", Psychometrika, 39(1), pp.31~36 (1974)[DOI]
  18. Lisa R. Klein, "Creating virtual product experiences: The role of telepresence", Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(1), pp.41~55 (2003), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  19. Kline, R. B., "Principles and practice of structural equation modeling" (2016), Guilford publications
  20. 이유정, "패션 브랜드 모바일 SNS의 특성이 브랜드 애착 및 브랜드 충성도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 복식문화연구, 22(5), pp.848~861 (2014), 복식문화학회[DOI]
  21. Li, D., "The role of need for cognition and mood in online flow experience", Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(3), pp.11~17 (2006)
  22. Jiunn-Woei Lian, "To buy or not to buy experience goods online: Perspective of innovation adoption barriers", Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), pp.665~672 (2013), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  23. Edwin A. Locke, "Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.", American Psychologist, 57(9), pp.705~717 (2002), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  24. Herbert W. Marsh, "In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings", Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), pp.320~341 (2004), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  25. Miles, M. B., "Qualitative data analysis : An expanded sourcebook" (1994), Sage Publications
  26. Vincent‐Wayne Mitchell, "Marketing causes and implications of consumer confusion", Journal of Product & Brand Management, 8(4), pp.319~342 (1999), Emerald[DOI]
  27. Mitchell, V. -W., "Towards a conceptual model of consumer confusion", Advances in Consumer Research, 32, pp.143~150 (2005)
  28. Nah, F. F. -H., "Enhancing brand equity through flow and telepresence : A comparison of 2D and 3D virtual worlds", MIS Quarterly, 35(3), pp.731~748 (2011)
  29. Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno, "How to reduce perceived risk when buying online: The interactions between intangibility, product knowledge, brand familiarity, privacy and security concerns", Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(4), pp.619~629 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  30. Thomas P. Novak, "Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach", Marketing Science, 19(1), pp.22~42 (2000), Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)[DOI]
  31. Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric methods" (1978), McGraw-Hill
  32. Nikolaos Pappas, "Effect of marketing activities, benefits, risks, confusion due to over-choice, price, quality and consumer trust on online tourism purchasing", Journal of Marketing Communications, 23(2), pp.195~218 (2014), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  33. Eun Joo Park, "Apparel product attributes, web browsing, and e-impulse buying on shopping websites", Journal of Business Research, 65(11), pp.1583~1589 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  34. Román, S., "Personal determinants of online shopping frustration and its influence on consumers' positive word of mouth", Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), pp.87~103 (2014)
  35. Susan Rose, "Online Customer Experience in e-Retailing: An empirical model of Antecedents and Outcomes", Journal of Retailing, 88(2), pp.308~322 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  36. Schweizer, M., "Scale development for consumer confusion", Advances in Consumer Research, 33, pp.184~190 (2006)
  37. 심수인, "온라인 쇼핑 도전감의 주제와 한미간 차이에 대한 다학제적 비교문화연구", 한국과학예술포럼, 23, pp.203~215 (2016), 한국전시산업융합연구원[DOI]
  38. Shim, S. I., "Impact of online flow on brand experience and loyalty", Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 16(1), pp.56~71 (2015)
  39. Soo In Shim, "Online Flow: Effects of Perceived Challenges Measured Before and After a Shopping Task", Fashion, Industry and Education, 14(1), pp.10~17 (2016), The Costume Culture Association[DOI]
  40. Solomon, M. R., "Consumer behavior : Buying, having, and being" (2014), Prentice Hall
  41. KP Suresh, "An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research", Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 4(1), pp.8~ (2011), Medknow[DOI]
  42. Alka Varma Citrin, "Adoption of Internet shopping: the role of consumer innovativeness", Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100(7), pp.294~300 (2000), Emerald[DOI]
  43. Voelkl, J. E., "Measuring flow experiences in daily life : An examination of the items used to measure challenge and skill", Journal of Leisure Research, 30(3), pp.380~389 (1998)
  44. Walsh, G., "The effect of consumer confusion proneness on word of mouth, trust, and customer satisfaction", European Journal of Marketing, 44(6), pp.838~859 (2010)[DOI]
  45. Wang, C. -C., "Flow experience and challenge-skill balance in e-learning", Paper presented at the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (2013)
  46. Liz C. Wang, "Antecedents of flow in retail store shopping", Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(4), pp.381~389 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  47. Jane Webster, "The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions", Computers in Human Behavior, 9(4), pp.411~426 (1993), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  48. Yu, U. -J., "Exploring multidimensions of product performance risk in the online apparel shopping context : Visual, tactile, and trial risks", Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 30(4), pp.251~266 (2012)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)