플래퍼 룩의 사회 문화적 의미 고찰: The New York Times 기사를 중심으로
Sociocultural meanings of flapper look: Analyzed from The New York Times articles
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to examine the sociocultural meanings of flapper look in American society during the 1920s. Using the ProQuest database, I searched articles from The New York Times published between 1920 and 1929 for opinions and discussions on the flapper look. Keywords included “clothing,” “dress,” “fashion,” and “flapper,” and advertisements and articles on menswear, leisurewear, and bathing suits were excluded. In the resulting articles, I extracted the following sociocultural meanings: autonomy, activeness, practicality, attractiveness, and extravagance. Meanings were analyzed from the opinions and discussions focusing on skirt length, dresses that directly and indirectly exposed the body, heavy make-up, non-constricting underwear, the H-line dress, bobbed hair, hygiene, comfort, and consumption. In sum, the 1920s flapper look represented progressive characteristics such as autonomous and active womanhood and practicality, which matched the technological development of the time. However, the flapper look was commercialized and exploited to make women look attractive and extravagant. Even though American women had access to higher education, more economic power, and suffrage in the 1920s, they were limited in their ability to overcome social conventions and the power of consumerism. Understanding the double-sidedness of flapper look within the social context of the time would enhance the comprehension of the relationship between women’s lifestyles and changing fashion.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the sociocultural meanings of flapper look in American society during the 1920s. Using the ProQuest database, I searched articles from The New York Times published between 1920 and 1929 for opinions and discussions on the flapper look. Keywords included “clothing,” “dress,” “fashion,” and “flapper,” and advertisements and articles on menswear, leisurewear, and bathing suits were excluded. In the resulting articles, I extracted the following sociocultural meanings: autonomy, activeness, practicality, attractiveness, and extravagance. Meanings were analyzed from the opinions and discussions focusing on skirt length, dresses that directly and indirectly exposed the body, heavy make-up, non-constricting underwear, the H-line dress, bobbed hair, hygiene, comfort, and consumption. In sum, the 1920s flapper look represented progressive characteristics such as autonomous and active womanhood and practicality, which matched the technological development of the time. However, the flapper look was commercialized and exploited to make women look attractive and extravagant. Even though American women had access to higher education, more economic power, and suffrage in the 1920s, they were limited in their ability to overcome social conventions and the power of consumerism. Understanding the double-sidedness of flapper look within the social context of the time would enhance the comprehension of the relationship between women’s lifestyles and changing fashion.
참고문헌 (73)
- Allen, F. L., "Only yesterday: An informal history of the nineteen-twenties" (1957), Harper & Brothers Publishers
- "Approves the short skirt", The New York Times, 16~ (1921)
- "Assails women's styles", The New York Times, 20~ (1925)
- Bae, J., "A comparative study on romantic style and modern style in the 1920s fashion", master's, pp.2017
- Cahn, S. K., "Coming on strong: Gender and sexuality in twentieth-century women's sport" (1994), Harvard University Press
- Calasibetta, C. M., "The Fairchild dictionary of fashion" (2003), Fairchild Publications
- "Calls for simple dress", The New York Times, 12~ (1922)
- "Calls our women most extravagant", The New York Times, 1~ (1928)
- Cho, K. H, "The emergence of garconne and it's costume in 1920's", Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 8(3), pp.207~218 (1984)
- 정현숙, "1920년대와 1960년대의 패션에 나타난 유사성에 관한 연구", 복식문화연구, 12(2), pp.224~238 (2004), 복식문화학회
- "College girls ban lace hose, high heels", The New York Times, 19~ (1921)
- Commager, H. S, "The American mind: An interpretation of American thought and character since the 1880's" (1950), Yale University Press
- "Condemns dress extremes of Chicago school girls", The New York Times, 17~ (1922)
- Degler, C. N., "At odds: Women and the family in America from the revolution to the present" (1980), Oxford University Press
- Doan, L, "Passing fashions: Reading female masculinities in the 1920s", Feminist Studies, 24(3), pp.663~700 (1998)[DOI]
- "Endorses longer dresses", The New York Times, 12~ (1921)
- Evans, S. M., "Born for liberty: A history of women in America" (1997), Free Press Paperbacks
- Ewen, S., "Channels of desire:Mass images and the shaping of American consciousness" (1992), University of Minnesota Press
- Fass, P. S., "The damned and the beautiful: American youth in the 1920's" (1977), Oxford University Press
- "Feminine rights endangered", The New York Times, 8~ (1921)
- Field, J., "'Fighting the corsetless evil': Shaping corsets and culture, 1900-1930", Journal of Social History, 33(2), pp.355~384 (1999)[DOI]
- Fitzgerald, F. S., "This side of paradise" (2010), Charles Scribner's Sons
- "In Oxford advanced American dictionary" (2018)[URL]
- "Flapper-made freedom", The New York Times, 12~ (1922)
- "Flappers resent move for regulation dress", The New York Times, 7~ (1923)
- ""Giddy" teachers taboo", The New York Times, 5~ (1922)
- "Hails the short skirt", The New York Times, 9~ (1921)
- Hall, L, "Fashion and style in the twenties: The change", The Historian, 34(3), pp.485~497 (1972)[DOI]
- Hannel, S. L., "Twentieth-century American fashion", pp.57~78 (2005), Berg
- Hawley, E. W., "The great war and the search for a modern order: A history of the American people and their institutions, 1917-1933" (1992), Waveland Press Inc
- "Health in fewer clothes", The New York Times, 13~ (1925)
- Hopkins, M. A, "What shall the poor girl wear?", The New Republic, 377~378 (1921)
- 황혜성, "“위험한 여성” 플래퍼: 1920년대 미국 문화 단면읽기", 미국사연구, 22, pp.89~118 (2005), 한국미국사학회
- "In Encyclopedia Britannica" (2018)[URL]
- Kennedy, D. M., "Freedom from fear: The American people in depression and war, 1929-1945" (1999), Oxford University Press
- 김경진, "플래퍼 패션의 미의식에 관한 연구", 복식, 61(2), pp.1~19 (2011), 한국복식학회
- Kim, M., "Fashion designers & fashion icon" (2014), Gyomoonsa
- 이진민, "잔느 랑방 디자인의 미적 특성", 한국디자인포럼, (29), pp.391~399 (2010), 한국디자인트렌드학회[DOI]
- Lee, K.-H., "Fashion and textile design of art deco", K.I.T. Research Journal, 29, pp.193~209 (2008)
- Lee, Y.-Y., "Controversies about American women's fashion, 1920-1945: Through the lens of The New York Times", doctoral, pp.2003
- Link, A. S., "American epoch: A history of the United States since 1900 (Vol. 2)" (1973), Alfred A. Knopt
- "Low neck and sleeveless evening gowns to be barred next year at Hood College", The New York Times, 1~ (1920)
- Lynd, R. S., "Middletown: A study in American culture" (1929), Harvest Books
- Marchand, R., "Advertising the American dream: Making way for modernity, 1920-1940" (1985), University of California Press
- "Opposes costly dressing", The New York Times, 12~ (1922)
- "Osteopaths favor 'freedom' in dress", The New York Times, 19~ (1929)
- Park, M. H, "A relationship between Chanel design and cubism in 1920's", Journal of Human Environment and Art, 11, pp.73~87 (1988)
- Payne, B., "The history of costume: From ancient Mesopotamia through the twentieth century" (1992), Harper Collins Publishers Inc.
- Peiss, K., "Cheap amusement: Working women and leisure in turn-of-the century New York" (1986), Temple University Press
- "Protests shorn teachers", The New York Times, 2~ (1922)
- Ress, S, "Finding the flapper: A historiographical look at image and attitude", History Compass, 8(1), pp.118~128 (2010)[DOI]
- Richards, L, "The rise and fall of it all: The hemlines and hiplines of the 1920s", Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 2(1), pp.42~48 (1983)[DOI]
- "Says scanty attire makes women hardy", The New York Times, 3~ (1926)
- "Signed pledge for modesty in dress asked from 700,000 catholic women", The New York Times, 1~ (1924)
- "Skirt length problem", The New York Times, 10~ (1922)
- "Skirts vex office morale", The New York Times, 2~ (1921)
- Standish, R. A., "What is modish is doomed: Fashion and American feminism from the 1910s to the early 1930s", doctoral, pp.2000
- Steele, V., "Fashion and eroticism: Ideals of feminine beauty from the Victorian era to the jazz age" (1985), Oxford University Press
- Stolberg, B., "The man behind the Times;Highlights in the history of the American press: A book of readings", pp.362~376 (1954), University of Minnesota Press
- Strom, S. H., "Beyond the typewriter: Gender, class, and the origins of modern American office work, 1900-1930" (1992), University of Illinois Press
- "Talks fail to fix length of skirts", The New York Times, 36~ (1929)
- "The long and short of it", The New York Times, 13~ (1922)
- "The tyranny of fashion", The New York Times, 6~ (1922)
- "The tyranny of style", The New York Times, 8~ (1922)
- "Trenton girls yield to ruling on rouge", The New York Times, 22~ (1922)
- "Uncorseted, is man's equal", The New York Times, 5~ (1921)
- Van Cleave, K., "Fashioning the college women: Dress, gender, and sexuality at Smith College in the 1920s", The Journal of American Culture, 32(1), pp.4~15 (2009)[DOI]
- "Want doctors' test for all healers", The New York Times, 6~ (1926)
- Ware, S., "Beyond suffrage: Women in the New Deal" (1981), Harvard University Press
- "Will bar silk dresses", The New York Times, 7~ (1924)
- "Woman arrested in Zion as modest dress violator", The New York Times, 16~ (1921)
- "Women's short skirts get endorsement", The New York Times, 4~ (1925)
- Yoo, S.-K, "A study on American women's costume in 1920's", Education Review, 14(8), pp.127~148 (1995)