보건의료 빅데이터를 활용한 생활습관 군집현상과 만성질환 유병의 연관성 분석: 지역사회건강조사 원시자료를 활용하여
Association between Clustering of Lifestyle and Chronic Disease Using Healthcare Big Data
1
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: In this study, the correlation between the clustering of lifestyle and the prevalence of chronic diseases was identified with the association rule analysis utilizing raw data of the Korean Community Health Survey by Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC). Methods: It identified the characteristics of the subject and selected the representative type of cluster through the association rule analysis. In addition, through the chisquare test, the sensitivity and specificity value, it tested the significance and validity of the association rule. Through the logistic regression analysis, identified the individual characteristic factors having influence on the cluster of lifestyle. Results: The statistically significant association rule was mainly composed of two or three lifestyle clusters and that composed of five lifestyle clusters the most was shown. In addition, there was lifestyle cluster shown commonly in the their age groups in all the chronic diseases and on the contrary, there was the lifestyle cluster shown in specific age group only. Also the specificity of all lifestyle clusters were represented greater than the sensitivity. In the results of identifying the association of individual factors by selecting the lifestyle cluster shown commonly in all chronic diseases in all age groups, the gender, residential area, and occupation showed the significant association in all clusters. Conclusions: It presented that drawing the meaningful results by applying the association rule analysis on the health care Big Data is possible. Particularly, the fact that the association rule showing specific pattern between the lifestyle and the chronic disease was discovered provides the important implication in correcting the lifestyle for chronic disease management and prevention.
Abstract
Objectives: In this study, the correlation between the clustering of lifestyle and the prevalence of chronic diseases was identified with the association rule analysis utilizing raw data of the Korean Community Health Survey by Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC). Methods: It identified the characteristics of the subject and selected the representative type of cluster through the association rule analysis. In addition, through the chisquare test, the sensitivity and specificity value, it tested the significance and validity of the association rule. Through the logistic regression analysis, identified the individual characteristic factors having influence on the cluster of lifestyle. Results: The statistically significant association rule was mainly composed of two or three lifestyle clusters and that composed of five lifestyle clusters the most was shown. In addition, there was lifestyle cluster shown commonly in the their age groups in all the chronic diseases and on the contrary, there was the lifestyle cluster shown in specific age group only. Also the specificity of all lifestyle clusters were represented greater than the sensitivity. In the results of identifying the association of individual factors by selecting the lifestyle cluster shown commonly in all chronic diseases in all age groups, the gender, residential area, and occupation showed the significant association in all clusters. Conclusions: It presented that drawing the meaningful results by applying the association rule analysis on the health care Big Data is possible. Particularly, the fact that the association rule showing specific pattern between the lifestyle and the chronic disease was discovered provides the important implication in correcting the lifestyle for chronic disease management and prevention.
참고문헌 (37)
- "Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010"[URL]
- 2018 Current state and issue of chronic disease, "Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention", Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ~ (2018)
- Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, "100 Disease statistics in living", Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, ~ (2018)
- "Innovative care for chronic conditions"[URL]
- A new perspective on the health of Canadians, "Lalonde M", Government of Canada, ~ (1974)
- 이중정, "도시 영세지역 및 농촌지역 성인들의생활습관 위험요인 군집 현상", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 22(4), pp.167~177 (2005), 한국보건교육건강증진학회
- Schuit AJ, "Clustering of lifestyle risk factors in a general adult population", Prev Med, 35(3), pp.219~224 (2002)[DOI]
- Fine LJ, "Prevalence of multiple chronic disease risk factors. 2001 National Health Interview Survey", Am J Prev Med, 27(2 Suppl), pp.18~24 (2004)[DOI]
- Chou KL, "The prevalence and clustering of four major lifestyle risk factors in Hong Kong Chinese older adults", J Aging Health, 20(7), pp.788~803 (2008)[DOI]
- 강기원, "흡연, 음주와 운동습관의 군집현상을 통한 건강행태의 고위험군: 국민건강영양 조사", 예방의학회지, 43(1), pp.73~83 (2010), 대한예방의학회
- 이정민, "한국인의 연령층별 사회경제적 계층에 따른 Alameda 7 건강행위 실천 수준과 이들의 주관적 건강수준에 미치는 영향", 박사, 보건학, pp.2011
- Kang HJ, "National-level use of health care big data and its policy implications", Health Welf Policy Forum, 238, pp.55~71 (2016)
- Manyika J, "Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity" (2011), McKinsey Global Institute
- Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Community Health Survey’s guidebook for 2016 raw data", Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ~ (2018)
- "Community Health Survey"[URL]
- 김태일, "소득계층에 따른 의료이용 격차 분석", 사회보장연구, 24(3), pp.53~75 (2008), 한국사회보장학회
- 정연, "소득수준이 주관적 건강상태에 미치는 영향의 연령대별 차이: 2001, 2005년 서울시민보건지표조사 자료의 분석 결과", 예방의학회지, 40(5), pp.381~387 (2007), 대한예방의학회
- 박소현, "연관성 분석을 이용한 한국인의 건강위험행위 군집현상 연구", 박사, 보건학과 보건학전공, pp.2014
- 여요환, "A Prospective Cohort Study on the Relationship of Sleep Duration With All-cause and Disease-specific Mortality in the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort Study", 예방의학회지, 46(5), pp.271~281 (2013), 대한예방의학회
- 구재옥, "30~50대 여성의 연령별 신체조성분과 식행동, 생활습관 관련 요인 연구", 대한지역사회영양학회지, 17(4), pp.440~449 (2012), 대한지역사회영양학회
- 박영례, "성인여성의 생활습관과 우울, 건강관련 삶의 질 -제주지역을 중심으로-", 지역사회간호학회지, 21(2), pp.148~155 (2010), 한국지역사회간호학회
- 유지수, "생활습관 요인이 대사증후군 유병 위험에 미치는 영향", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 39(4), pp.594~601 (2009), 한국간호과학회
- 이지현, "보건의료 공공데이터를 이용한 치매중심 질환간 연관성 분석", 데이타베이스연구, 33(2), pp.137~148 (2017), 한국정보과학회
- Jeon SA, "Analysis the association and effect variables of hypertensionrelated diseases based on the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey", pp.2017
- Kim SH, "Analysis of associated disease in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by applying parallax association rules", HIRA Policy Issues, 12(1), pp.53~59 (2018)
- 김슬람, "소아청소년기 비만과 동반한 질병 연관성 분석", 데이타베이스연구, 33(3), pp.52~60 (2017), 한국정보과학회
- 유기상, "연관성 분석에서 표준화 향상도의 개선 방안 연구", Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 18(1), pp.189~197 (2016), 한국자료분석학회
- Song SW, "Using the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve to measure sensitivity and specificity", Korean J Fam Med, 30(11), pp.841~842 (2009)[DOI]
- "Global status report on noncommunicable disease 2010"[URL]
- Chiolero A, "Clustering of risk behaviors with cigarette consumption : A population based survey", Prev Med, 42(5), pp.348~353 (2006)[DOI]
- Poortinga W, "The prevalence and clustering of four major lifestyle risk factors in an English adult population", Prev Med, 44(2), pp.124~128 (2007)[DOI]
- Kim HR, "The relationship of socioeconomic position and health behaviors with morbidity in Seoul, Korea", Health Soc Welf Rev, 25(2), pp.3~35 (2005)
- 손미아, "사회계급과 건강행위가 유병률에 미치는 영향", 예방의학회지, 35(1), pp.7~64 (2002), 대한예방의학회
- Smith GD, "Explanations for socioeconomic differentials in mortality : evidence from Britain and elsewhere", Eur J Public Health, 4(2), pp.131~144 (1994)
- Goldstein MG, "Multiple behavioral risk factor interventions in primary care. Summary of research evidence", Am J Prev Med, 27(2 Suppl), pp.61~79 (2004)[DOI]
- Nigg CR, "Theory-comparison and multiple behavior research : common themes advancing health behavior research", Health Educ Res, 17(5), pp.670~679 (2002)[DOI]
- Yusuf S, "Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries(the INTERHEART study) : case-control study", Lancet, 364(9438), pp.937~952 (2004)[DOI]
