唐 高宗‧武則天 時期 國家儀禮와 道敎* - 投龍 儀禮의 재검토 ―
State Ritual and Daoism during the Reigns of Gaozong and Wu Zetian: a re-examination of dragon-casting rite in the Tang
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Even though the Tang imperial house is known to have claimed descent of Laozi and officially sponsored Daoism, Daoism has rarely been taken into account in academic discourses on the Tang state ritual system. Dragon-casting rite (toulong 投龍) might be one exception. A number of stone inscriptions from the period tell us that particularly Wu Zetian and Xuanzong frequently performed this rite. But By misunderstanding this Daoist rite of rather small scale to be an independent rite, previous scholarship failed to provide the liturgical context and accordingly misrepresented the ritual practice of the time. A close examination of Daoist ritual sources informs us that Daoist zhai (齋) normally began with the rite of announcement on the eve of the main performance (suqi 宿啓), repeated the rite of audience with deities (xingdao 行道) including repentance (chanhui 懺悔) and scripture reading (zhuanjing 轉經) for a few days, proceeded to the rite of submitting a memorial (baibiao 拜表), and ended with a jiao 醮 offering to reward related deities. The final procedure to conclude the entire ritual programme was casting dragon figurine and slip (toulong jian 投龍簡), in order to report to the divine realm on the performance. Thus dragon-casting rite was not a ritual to be performed independently, and it should be seen to be a part of zhaijiao of lager scale. The findings from a detailed analysis of Daoist ritual structure make it clear that all the relevant sources relate the fact that Daoist zhaijiao, not merely dragon-casting rite, was frequently performed under the orders of Wu Zetian and Xuanzong. But there is an epigraphical source suggesting that use of Daoist zhaijiao performed in the context of state ritual can be traced back to the reign of Gaozong. When the first Feng and Shan sacrifices at Mount Tai in 666, performed by Gaozong, a dragon figurine was thrown from a precipice by Gaozong's order about one month later. The officials in charge of this rite were holding titles showing that their duty was to supervise the preparation and implement of the Feng and Shan sacrifices. Given that Gaozong was on imperial visit and the preparation must have been necessary, this particular rite is very likely to have been previously planned. This epigraphy therefore indicates that a Daoist zhai or jiao, followed by the dragon-casting rite, was performed as supplement to, or in connection to the Feng and Shan sacrifices. Furthermore, Gaozong attempted to carry out the Feng and Shan sacrifices at all of the five sacred mounts, which implies that all the sacrifices would have been followed by Daoist zhaijiao. Gaozong’s strong interest in and support of Daoism was apparent. He announced a new title for himself in 674, the Heavenly Emperor (tianhuang 天皇), which had strong Daoist overtones and long history as the supreme and primordial ruler of the cosmos. Also when he was planning the second Feng and Shan sacrifices at the Mount Song, he visited the mount and met with Pan Shizheng 潘師正, a Daoist who was then residing there. Pan Shizheng seems to have been deeply involved in the Gaozong’s new attempt. It does not seem a coincidence that deified Laozi appeared in front of Gaozong and Daoist priests at Luoyang, which could be taken as an auspicious sign to encourage the new Feng and Shan sacrifices. All these evidences indicates that Gaozong himself was using Daoism, particularly its ritual to reinforce and manifest his authority. Thus the frequent observances of Daoist ritual during the reign of Empress Wu was in a sense a to be understood to be originated from the reign of Gaozong, and similar approach can be later found in Xuanzong's reign.
Abstract
Even though the Tang imperial house is known to have claimed descent of Laozi and officially sponsored Daoism, Daoism has rarely been taken into account in academic discourses on the Tang state ritual system. Dragon-casting rite (toulong 投龍) might be one exception. A number of stone inscriptions from the period tell us that particularly Wu Zetian and Xuanzong frequently performed this rite. But By misunderstanding this Daoist rite of rather small scale to be an independent rite, previous scholarship failed to provide the liturgical context and accordingly misrepresented the ritual practice of the time. A close examination of Daoist ritual sources informs us that Daoist zhai (齋) normally began with the rite of announcement on the eve of the main performance (suqi 宿啓), repeated the rite of audience with deities (xingdao 行道) including repentance (chanhui 懺悔) and scripture reading (zhuanjing 轉經) for a few days, proceeded to the rite of submitting a memorial (baibiao 拜表), and ended with a jiao 醮 offering to reward related deities. The final procedure to conclude the entire ritual programme was casting dragon figurine and slip (toulong jian 投龍簡), in order to report to the divine realm on the performance. Thus dragon-casting rite was not a ritual to be performed independently, and it should be seen to be a part of zhaijiao of lager scale. The findings from a detailed analysis of Daoist ritual structure make it clear that all the relevant sources relate the fact that Daoist zhaijiao, not merely dragon-casting rite, was frequently performed under the orders of Wu Zetian and Xuanzong. But there is an epigraphical source suggesting that use of Daoist zhaijiao performed in the context of state ritual can be traced back to the reign of Gaozong. When the first Feng and Shan sacrifices at Mount Tai in 666, performed by Gaozong, a dragon figurine was thrown from a precipice by Gaozong's order about one month later. The officials in charge of this rite were holding titles showing that their duty was to supervise the preparation and implement of the Feng and Shan sacrifices. Given that Gaozong was on imperial visit and the preparation must have been necessary, this particular rite is very likely to have been previously planned. This epigraphy therefore indicates that a Daoist zhai or jiao, followed by the dragon-casting rite, was performed as supplement to, or in connection to the Feng and Shan sacrifices. Furthermore, Gaozong attempted to carry out the Feng and Shan sacrifices at all of the five sacred mounts, which implies that all the sacrifices would have been followed by Daoist zhaijiao. Gaozong’s strong interest in and support of Daoism was apparent. He announced a new title for himself in 674, the Heavenly Emperor (tianhuang 天皇), which had strong Daoist overtones and long history as the supreme and primordial ruler of the cosmos. Also when he was planning the second Feng and Shan sacrifices at the Mount Song, he visited the mount and met with Pan Shizheng 潘師正, a Daoist who was then residing there. Pan Shizheng seems to have been deeply involved in the Gaozong’s new attempt. It does not seem a coincidence that deified Laozi appeared in front of Gaozong and Daoist priests at Luoyang, which could be taken as an auspicious sign to encourage the new Feng and Shan sacrifices. All these evidences indicates that Gaozong himself was using Daoism, particularly its ritual to reinforce and manifest his authority. Thus the frequent observances of Daoist ritual during the reign of Empress Wu was in a sense a to be understood to be originated from the reign of Gaozong, and similar approach can be later found in Xuanzong's reign.
참고문헌 (68)
- 金子修一, "古代中國と皇帝祭祀" (2001), 汲古書院
- 金子修一, "中國古代皇帝祭祀の硏究" (2006), 岩波書店
- "唐會要, 標點本 卷50", pp.1013~ (2006), 上海古籍出版社
- 砂山稔, "李弘から寇謙之へ ― 西暦四‧五世紀における宗教的反乱と国家宗教", 集刊東洋學, 26(1) (1971)
- B. Mather, "K'ou Ch'ien-chih and the Taoist Theocracy at the Northern Wei Court", 425~451
- Holmes Welch, "Facets of Taoism: Essays in Chinese Religion" (1979), Yale University Press
- 佐藤智水, "北魏造像銘考", 史學雜誌, 86(10) (1977)
- 侯旭东, "五六世纪北方民众佛教信仰 ― 以造像记为中心的考察" (1998), 中国社会科学出版社
- 任爽, "唐代禮制硏究" (1999), 東北師範大學出版社
- 金子修一, "則天武后の明堂について ― その政治的性格の檢討, In 律令制 中國朝鮮の法と國家" (1986), 汲古書院
- 金子修一, "古代中國と皇帝祭祀" (2001), 汲古書院
- Howard J. Wechsler, "Offerings of Jade and Silk: Ritual and Symbol in the Legitimation of the T'ang Dynasty" (1985), Yale University Press
- 金相範, "唐 前期 封禪儀禮의 展開와 그 意義", 역사문화연구, 17 (2002)
- 雷聞, "唐代道敎與國家禮儀 ― 以高宗封禪活動爲中心", 中華文史論叢 (2001)
- 麥谷邦夫, "唐代封禪儀小考, In 中國文明の形成" (2005), 朋友書店
- 饒宗頤, "從石刻論武后的宗敎信仰", 中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所集刊, 45(3) (1974)
- 雷聞, "道敎徒馬元貞與武周革命", 中國史硏究 (2004)
- Victor Xiong, "Ritual Innovations and Taoism under Tang Xuanzong", T'oung Pao, 82 (1996)
- 吳麗娛, "論九宮祭祀與道敎崇拜", 唐硏究, 9 (2003)
- 雷聞, "五岳眞君祠與唐代國家祭祀, In 唐代宗敎信仰與社會" (2003), 上海辭書出版社
- 耿直, "武則天金簡", 中州今古 (1984)
- 楊育彬, "河南考古", pp.407~409 (1985), 中州古籍出版社
- 周西波, "敦煌寫卷P.2354與唐代道敎投龍活動", 敦煌學, 22 (1999)
- 神塚淑子, "道敎儀禮と龍―六朝‧唐代の投龍簡をめぐって", 日中文化硏究, 3 (1992)
- 神塚淑子, "則天武后期の道敎, In 唐代の道敎" (2000), 朋友書店
- 李焯然, "道苑繽粉錄―柳存仁敎授八十五歲祝壽論文集" (2002), 商務印書館
- 葛兆光, "唐宋時期道敎的投龍, In 屈服史及其他―六朝隋唐道敎的思想史硏究" (2003), 三聯書店
- 雷聞, "道敎徒馬元貞與武周革命", 中國史硏究 (2004)
- 李零, "秦駰禱病玉版的硏究", 國學硏究, 6 (1999)
- 劉昭瑞, "道家與道敎―第二屆國際學術硏討會論文集(道敎卷), In 道家與道敎―第二屆國際學術硏討會論文集(道敎卷)" (2001), 廣東人民出版社
- "八瓊室金石補正 卷56", pp.15~
- "金石萃編 卷53, In 岱岳觀碑", pp.15~15
- "八瓊室金石補正 卷40, In 金臺觀主馬元貞投龍記", pp.19~20
- "金石續編 卷6, In 馬元貞投龍記", pp.7~8
- "金石萃編 卷53, In 岱岳觀碑", pp.16~
- "金石萃編 卷53, In 岱岳觀碑", pp.17~
- Christoper Schipper, "Concordance du Tao-tsang" (1975), EFEO
- HY507), 卷49, In 言功拜表, "太上黃籙齋儀(CT507"
- HY507) 卷50 , In 散壇設醮, "太上黃籙齋儀(CT507"
- HY507), 卷55 , In 投龍璧儀, "太上黃籙齋儀(CT507"
- HY1130) 卷54, In 黃籙齋品, "無上秘要(CT1138"
- "金石萃編 卷53, In 岱岳觀碑", pp.18~18
- "金石萃編 卷53, In 岱岳觀碑", pp.15~
- "金石萃編 卷53, In 岱岳觀碑", pp.19~19
- HY1277), "正一法文經護國醮海品(CT1287"
- "金石萃編 卷53, In 岱岳觀碑", pp.16~
- 陳垣, "道家金石略", pp.123~ (1988), 文物出版社
- 大淵忍爾, "敦煌道經: 圖錄篇", pp.718~719 (1978), 福武書店
- 大淵忍爾, "敦煌道經: 目錄篇", pp.330~ (1978), 福武書店
- 饒宗頤, "從石刻論武后的宗敎信仰", 中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所集刊, 45(3), pp.410~411 (1974)
- 雷聞, "郊廟之外-隋唐國家祭祀與宗敎", pp.153~166 (2009), 三聯書店
- 金子修一, "唐代における郊祀宗廟の‧運用", 中國古代皇帝祭祀の硏究, pp.325~345 (2006), 中國古代皇帝祭祀の硏究
- "舊唐書 卷5 , In 高宗本紀 下", pp.89~90
- "山左金石志 卷11, In 王知愼等題名", pp.11~
- 雷聞, "郊廟之外-隋唐國家祭祀與宗敎", pp.146~148 (2009), 三聯書店
- "舊唐書 卷23, In 禮儀志 3", pp.889~
- "資治通鑑 卷202 , In 唐紀 十八 儀鳳 元年 條", pp.6379~
- "舊唐書 卷5, In 高宗本紀 下", pp.104~105
- "舊唐書 卷5, In 高宗本紀 下", pp.111~112
- "資治通鑑 卷 202 , In 唐紀 十八", pp.6375~6376
- 金相範, "唐 前期 封禪儀禮의 展開와 그 意義", 역사문화연구, 17, pp.51~53 (2002)
- T. H. Barrett, "The Woman Who Discovered Printing", pp.80~83 (2008), Yale University Press
- 任大熙, "則天皇太后 執政時期의 政治와 人物", 魏晉隋唐史硏究, 2, pp.180~ (1996)
- "資治通鑑 卷202, In 唐紀 十八", pp.6372~
- 福永光司, "昊天上帝と天皇大帝と元始天尊, In 道敎思想史硏究", pp.123~124 (1987), 岩波書店
- 吉川忠夫, "道敎の道系と禪の法系", 東洋學術硏究, 27, pp.14~18 (1988)
- "大唐六典 卷4, In 尙書禮部 大唐六典", pp.101~102 (1989), 廣池學園出版部
- "金石萃編 卷53, In 岱岳觀碑", pp.23~
