본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고혈압 환자의 뇌졸중 발병에 대한 소득 수준의 영향 및 약물 투약 순응도의 매개효과: 국민건강보험공단 표본코호트 연구

Effect of Income Level on Stroke Incidence and Mediated Effects of Medication Adherence in Newly Diagnosed Hypertensive Patients: A Causal Mediation Analysis Using a Nationwide Cohort Study in South Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the associations between income level and stroke incidence in hypertensive patients. We also tried to mea- sure the mediating effect of poor antihypertensive medication adherence through causal mediation analysis. Methods: This study used the National Health Insurance Service National Sample Cohort Data from 2006 to 2015. The study population was newly diagnosed patients with hypertension aged 18 to 80. The associations between the independent-dependent variables, the mediator-dependent variables were confirmed with Cox proportional hazards regression models. In order to verify the mediating effect of poor hypertension medication adherence between income level and stroke occur- rence, a weighting approach of causal mediation analysis method was used. Since age was the moderate variable, 18-49 years old and 50-80 years old were stratified. Results: Under 50 years of age, all the other income groups had a significantly higher risk of poor medication adherence than the high- income group. For the patients aged 50 and older, the low-income group and the Medical Aid beneficiaries had a higher risk of poor medication adher- ence compared to the high-income group. In the patient under 50 years of age, the risk for the stroke incidence of the low-income group and the Medi- cal Aid beneficiaries were higher than those in the high-income group. In the patients aged 50 and older, all the other income groups had a significantly higher risk of incidence of stroke. Causal mediation analysis showed that the mediated effect of poor medication adherence in all groups was not signifi- cant. Conclusions: Low income significantly increased poor hypertension medication adherence and the incidence of stroke. The mediated effect of poor medication adherence was not significant.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the associations between income level and stroke incidence in hypertensive patients. We also tried to mea- sure the mediating effect of poor antihypertensive medication adherence through causal mediation analysis. Methods: This study used the National Health Insurance Service National Sample Cohort Data from 2006 to 2015. The study population was newly diagnosed patients with hypertension aged 18 to 80. The associations between the independent-dependent variables, the mediator-dependent variables were confirmed with Cox proportional hazards regression models. In order to verify the mediating effect of poor hypertension medication adherence between income level and stroke occur- rence, a weighting approach of causal mediation analysis method was used. Since age was the moderate variable, 18-49 years old and 50-80 years old were stratified. Results: Under 50 years of age, all the other income groups had a significantly higher risk of poor medication adherence than the high- income group. For the patients aged 50 and older, the low-income group and the Medical Aid beneficiaries had a higher risk of poor medication adher- ence compared to the high-income group. In the patient under 50 years of age, the risk for the stroke incidence of the low-income group and the Medi- cal Aid beneficiaries were higher than those in the high-income group. In the patients aged 50 and older, all the other income groups had a significantly higher risk of incidence of stroke. Causal mediation analysis showed that the mediated effect of poor medication adherence in all groups was not signifi- cant. Conclusions: Low income significantly increased poor hypertension medication adherence and the incidence of stroke. The mediated effect of poor medication adherence was not significant.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Sacco RL, "An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century : a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association", American Stroke Association, 2013, pp.44(7), 2064~2089
  2. GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators, "Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016 : a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016", Lancet Neurol, 18(5), pp.459~480 (2019)[DOI]
  3. Mansfield A, "Handb Clin Neurol 159", pp.205~228 (2018)
  4. Avan A, "Socioeconomic status and stroke incidence, prevalence, mortality, and worldwide burden : an ecological analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017", BMC Med, 17(1), pp.191~ (2019)[DOI]
  5. Cipolla MJ, "The importance of comorbidities in ischemic stroke : Impact of hypertension on the cerebral circulation", J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 38(12), pp.2129~2149 (2018)[DOI]
  6. Lee HJ, "Effect of adherence to antihypertensive medication on stroke incidence in patients with hypertension : a populationbased retrospective cohort study", BMJ Open, 7(6), pp.e014486~ (2017)[DOI]
  7. Chobanian AV, "The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure : the JNC 7 report", JAMA, 289(19), pp.2560~2572 (2003)[DOI]
  8. Lackland DT, "Implications of recent clinical trials and hypertension guidelines on stroke and future cerebrovascular research", Stroke, 49(3), pp.772~779 (2018)[DOI]
  9. Osypuk TL, "Do social and economic policies influence health? A review", Curr Epidemiol Rep, 1(3), pp.149~164 (2014)[DOI]
  10. Bray BD, "Socioeconomic disparities in first stroke incidence, quality of care, and survival : a nationwide registry-based cohort study of 44 million adults in England", Lancet Public Health, 3(4), pp.e185~e193 (2018)[DOI]
  11. Lee J, "Cohort profile : The National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort(NHIS-NSC), South Korea", Int J Epidemiol, 46(2), pp.e15~ (2017)[DOI]
  12. Song YJ, "The South Korean health care system", JMAJ, 52(3), pp.206~209 (2009)
  13. 서수라, "The Incidence of Stroke by Socioeconomic Status, Age, Sex, and Stroke Subtype: A Nationwide Study in Korea", 예방의학회지, 47(2), pp.104~112 (2014), 대한예방의학회
  14. Ki-Tae Hwang, "Prognostic influence of Korean public medical insurance system on breast cancer patients", Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research, 96(2), pp.58~69 (2019), 대한외과학회[DOI]
  15. 박동휘, "Dilemmas Within the Korean Health Insurance System", 예방의학회지, 53(4), pp.285~288 (2020), 대한예방의학회[DOI]
  16. Poluzzi E, "Adherence to statin therapy and patients’ cardiovascular risk : a pharmacoepidemiological study in Italy", Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 64(4), pp.425~432 (2008)[DOI]
  17. Raebel MA, "Standardizing terminology and definitions of medication adherence and persistence in research employing electronic databases", Med Care, 51(8Suppl 3), pp.S11~S21 (2013)[DOI]
  18. Burnier M, "Is there a threshold for medication adherence? Lessons learnt from electronic monitoring of drug adherence", Front Pharmacol, 9, pp.1540~ (2019)[DOI]
  19. Rha JH, "Two-year direct medical costs of stroke in Korea : a multi-centre incidence-based study from hospital perspectives", Int J Stroke, 8(3), pp.186~192 (2012)[DOI]
  20. Thygesen SK, "The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients", BMC Med Res Methodol, 11, pp.83~ (2011)[DOI]
  21. Smajlović D, "Strokes in young adults : epidemiology and prevention", Vasc Health Risk Manag, 11, pp.157~164 (2015)[DOI]
  22. Boot E, "Ischaemic stroke in young adults : a global perspective", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 91(4), pp.411~417 (2020)[DOI]
  23. Griffiths D, "Epidemiology and etiology of young stroke", Stroke Res Treat, 2011, pp.209370~ (2011)[DOI]
  24. 신현영, "The Association between Socioeconomic Status and Adherence to Health Check-up in Korean Adults, Based on the 2010–2012 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 39(2), pp.114~121 (2018), 대한가정의학회
  25. Baron RM, "The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations", J Pers Soc Psychol, 51(6), pp.1173~1182 (1986)[DOI]
  26. Richiardi L, "Mediation analysis in epidemiology : methods, interpretation and bias", Int J Epidemiol, 42(5), pp.1511~1519 (2013)[DOI]
  27. Imai K, "A general approach to causal mediation analysis", Psychol Methods, 15(4), pp.309~334 (2010)[DOI]
  28. VanderWeele TJ, "Mediation analysis : a practitioner’s guide", Annu Rev Public Health, 37, pp.17~32 (2016)[DOI]
  29. Lange T, "A simple unified approach for estimating natural direct and indirect effects", Am J Epidemiol, 176(3), pp.190~195 (2012)[DOI]
  30. Burches E, "Efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency in the health care: the need for an agreement to clarify its meaning", Int Arch Public Health Community Med, 4(1) (2020)[DOI]
  31. Wang J, "Method for evaluating multiple mediators : mediating effects of smoking and COPD on the association between the CHRNA5-A3 variant and lung cancer risk", PLoS One, 7(10), pp.e47705~ (2012)[DOI]
  32. Lin DY, "Proper analysis of secondary phenotype data in casecontrol association studies", Genet Epidemiol, 33(3), pp.256~265 (2009)[DOI]
  33. Groeniger JO, "Advancing mediation analysis in occupational health research", Scand J Work Environ Health, 46(2), pp.113~116 (2020)[DOI]
  34. Unni E, "Change in medication adherence and beliefs in medicines over time in older adults", Glob J Health Sci, 8(5), pp.39~47 (2015)[DOI]
  35. Field-Fote EE, "Mediators and moderators, confounders and covariates : exploring the variables that illuminate or obscure the"Active Ingredients"in neurorehabilitation", J Neurol Phys Ther, 43(2), pp.83~84 (2019)[DOI]
  36. Benzeval M, "Do social inequalities in health widen or converge with age? Longitudinal evidence from three cohorts in the West of Scotland", BMC Public Health, 11, pp.947~ (2011)[DOI]
  37. House JS, "Continuity and change in the social stratification of aging and health over the life course : evidence from a nationally representative longitudinal study from 1986 to 2001", 2002(Americans’Changing Lives Study), 2005, pp.60(Spec No:15-26), ~
  38. Herd P, "Do functional health inequalities decrease in old age? Educational status and functional decline among the 1931-1941 birth cohort", Res Aging, 28(3), pp.375~392 (2006)[DOI]
  39. Brown TH, "Using multiplehierarchy stratification and life course approaches to understand health inequalities : the intersecting consequences of race, gender, SES, and age", J Health Soc Behav, 57(2), pp.200~222 (2016)[DOI]
  40. Dupre ME, "Educational differences in age-related patterns of disease : Reconsidering the cumulative disadvantage and age-as-leveler hypotheses", J Health Soc Behav, 48(1), pp.1~15 (2007)[DOI]
  41. Oza R, "Recurrent ischemic stroke : strategies for prevention", Am Fam Physician, 96(7), pp.436~440 (2017)
  42. Langhorne P, "Medical complications after stroke : a multicenter study", Stroke, 31(6), pp.1223~1229 (2000)[DOI]
  43. Hammig B, "Paid sick leave benefits and adherence to recommended screening tests among male labor workers in the United States", J Occup Environ Med, 61(2), pp.102~106 (2019)[DOI]
  44. Lee H, "Combined effect of income and medication adherence on mortality in newly treated hypertension : nationwide study of 16 million person-years", J Am Heart Assoc, 8(16), pp.e013148~ (2019)[DOI]
  45. Mishra SI, "Adherence to medication regimens among low-income patients with multiple comorbid chronic conditions", Health Soc Work, 36(4), pp.249~258 (2011)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)