漢代 碑刻 연구의 歷程
Study on the course of inscriptions of the Han Dynasty
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A study on the documents of inscription has a history of more than 1,000 years, and there is a great deal of achievement accumulated between them. In the past, researches were generally performed by comparing the contents of The Han Dynasty inscriptions with the historical records and correcting the errors of the historical records or documents of inscription. Generally, it was mainly the supplementary work to supplement the blank or error of the historical records by using the documents of inscription. It is clear that Chinese historical records were written precisely by historians, but they are often incompatible with facts because they are completed in decades or centuries. Compared to the librarian's records, however, they are generally reliable because they are completed at a time not far from the event. Conversely, documents of inscription are highly likely to be worn or destroyed in certain circumstances, which can be supplemented by librarian's records. These researches are mainly focused on the collection of the Han Dynasty(漢) inscriptions and the study of inscription texts, and the comparative study of the librarian's records and stone sculpture data will be continue. The study using documents of inscription is of great value in the sense of culture form which is an indicator in East Asian civilization rights. In other words, the study of inscription has an important meaning in comprehensively understanding the reality of ancient East Asia. This research has been going on for over a thousand years, and has realized its value in each age. Currently, it is still an important task to realize the value of the era in inscription research. documents of inscription have different forms and meanings depending on the each period, the nature of the society, so the documents of inscription can be used as mirrors to realize the past. From this point of view, documents of inscription can be a fascinating object of study that can lead to various themes such as institutional, social and cultural exchange.
Abstract
A study on the documents of inscription has a history of more than 1,000 years, and there is a great deal of achievement accumulated between them. In the past, researches were generally performed by comparing the contents of The Han Dynasty inscriptions with the historical records and correcting the errors of the historical records or documents of inscription. Generally, it was mainly the supplementary work to supplement the blank or error of the historical records by using the documents of inscription. It is clear that Chinese historical records were written precisely by historians, but they are often incompatible with facts because they are completed in decades or centuries. Compared to the librarian's records, however, they are generally reliable because they are completed at a time not far from the event. Conversely, documents of inscription are highly likely to be worn or destroyed in certain circumstances, which can be supplemented by librarian's records. These researches are mainly focused on the collection of the Han Dynasty(漢) inscriptions and the study of inscription texts, and the comparative study of the librarian's records and stone sculpture data will be continue. The study using documents of inscription is of great value in the sense of culture form which is an indicator in East Asian civilization rights. In other words, the study of inscription has an important meaning in comprehensively understanding the reality of ancient East Asia. This research has been going on for over a thousand years, and has realized its value in each age. Currently, it is still an important task to realize the value of the era in inscription research. documents of inscription have different forms and meanings depending on the each period, the nature of the society, so the documents of inscription can be used as mirrors to realize the past. From this point of view, documents of inscription can be a fascinating object of study that can lead to various themes such as institutional, social and cultural exchange.
참고문헌 (61)
- 司馬遷, "史記" (2002), 中華書局
- 班固, "漢書" (2002), 中華書局
- 範曄, "後漢書" (2002), 中華書局
- 歐陽修, "集古錄跋尾" (1998), 江蘇古籍出版社
- 趙明誠, "金石錄校證" (1985), 上海書畫出版社
- 洪適, "隸釋" (1985), 中華書局
- 王昶, "金石萃編" (1985), 中國書店
- 陸增祥, "八瓊室金石補正" (1985), 文物出版社
- 翁方綱, "兩漢金石記(博古齋影印書齋叢書本)" (1924)
- 葉昌熾, "語石異同評" (1994), 中華書局
- 北京圖書館金石組, "北京圖書館藏中國歷代石刻拓本滙編(全100冊)" (1991), 中州古籍出版社
- 新文豊出版公司編輯部, "石刻史料新編(全4輯ㆍ100冊)" (2006), 新文豊出版有限公司
- 容媛, "秦漢石刻題跋輯錄(全2冊)" (2009), 上海古籍出版社
- 毛遠明, "漢魏六朝碑刻校注(全11冊)" (2009), 綫藏書局
- 仁井田陞, "中國法制史硏究 土地法ㆍ取引法" (1959), 汲古書院
- 馬 衡, "凡將齋金石叢稿" (1977), 中華書局
- 中西慶爾, "中國の石刻" (1981), 木耳社
- 施蟄存, "水經注碑錄" (1987), 天津古籍出版社
- 宮衍興, "濟寧全漢碑" (1990), 齊魯書社
- 毛遠明, "碑刻文獻學通論" (2009), 中華書局
- 李 檣, "秦漢刻石選譯" (2009), 文物出版社
- 王玉池, "古代碑帖譯註" (2010), 文物出版社
- 彭興林, "中國歷代名碑釋要(上ㆍ下)" (2011), 山東美術出版社
- 羅振玉, "蒿裏遺珍" (2013), 上海古籍出版社
- 李 檣, "杞芳堂讀碑記" (2014), 西泠印社出版社
- 劉海宇, "山東漢代碑刻硏究" (2015), 齊魯書社
- 盧 蓉, "中國墓碑硏究" (2015), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 中國漢碑學術討論會, "漢碑硏究" (1990), 齊魯出版社
- 曾 庸, "漢碑中有關農民起義的一些材料", 文物 (1960)
- 池前溫, "中國歷代墓卷略考", 東洋文化硏究所紀要, 86 (1981)
- 吳天潁, "漢代買地券考", 考古學報 (1982)
- 夏超雄, "宋代金石學的主要貢獻及其興起的原因", 北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版) (1982)
- 呂宗力, "從漢碑看讖緯神學對東漢思想的影響", 中國哲學, 12 (1984)
- 暴鴻昌, "淸代金石學及其史學價値", 中國社會科學 (1992)
- 蔡培桂, "東漢碑刻史料價値擧例", 山東師範大學(社會科學版) (1992)
- 劉毅, "從金石學到考古學-淸代學術管窺之一", 華夏考古 (1998)
- 呂志峰, "東漢買地券著錄與研究概述", 南都學壇 (2003)
- 劉心明, "略論金石學興起於宋代的原因", 山東大學學報(哲學社會科學版) (2004)
- 남종진, "中國 墓誌銘 起源考", 중국어문학논집, (26), pp.699~721 (2004), 중국어문학연구회
- 吳俊德, "從『八瓊室金石祛偽』談石刻辨偽的方法", 北市教大語文學刊 (2006)
- 趙振華, "〈張禹碑〉與洛陽東漢皇陵", 湖南科技學院學報, 27 (2006)
- 魯西奇, "漢代買地券的實質ㆍ淵源與意義", 中國史硏究 (2006)
- 程章燦, "作爲文本的漢代石刻-讀『漢代石刻集成』", 古典文獻硏究 (2008)
- 袁延勝, "漢碑中所見漢代的農業", 農業考古 (2009)
- 呂 婷, "論漢碑的史料價値", 碩士, pp.2010
- 劉海宇, "漢碑的形制與讖緯思想", 齊魯學刊, 221 (2011)
- 楊子墨, "山東漢碑的分布ㆍ刑制及特點", 中國書畫 (2011)
- 趙超, "成都新出漢碑兩種釋讀", 文物 (2012)
- 何如月, "漢碑的經典化進展及其影響", 陝西師範大學學報(社會科學版) (2012)
- 孟國棟, "墓志的起源與墓志文體的成立", 浙江大學學報(人文社會科學版), 43 (2013)
- 홍승현, "後漢代 墓碑의 성행과 建安十年 禁碑令의 반포", 동양사학연구, (124), pp.61~100 (2013), 동양사학회
- 顧春軍, "墓志源流考論", 民俗研究 (2015)
- 呂名軍, "河南漢碑保存現狀", 鄭州工業大學學報(社會科學版), 713 (2015)
- 劉怡青, "從刻石到立碑－由石刻資料看漢碑之發展", 止善, 19 (2015)
- 홍승현, "中國 古中世 石刻資料 解題 및 譯註Ⅰ", 중국사연구, (96), pp.301~344 (2015), 중국사학회
- 동아시아 古中世 石刻資料 解題 및 譯註 Ⅲ, "중국고중세사연구", 2015, 265~305, pp.중국고중세사학회
- 홍승현, "墓碑의 출현과 後漢末 墓碑銘의 정형화", 중국고중세사연구, (35), pp.287~331 (2015), 중국고중세사학회
- 홍승현, "漢代 墓記ㆍ墓碑ㆍ墓誌의 출현과 상호 관련성 - 墓記의 내용 변화를 중심으로 -", 중국고중세사연구, (42), pp.297~337 (2016), 중국고중세사학회
- 潘勝強, "淸代金石學硏究領域的拓展及其原因探析", 陰山學刊 (2016)
- 조초, "중국 고대 문자석각 주요형제의 변화와 발전", 중국고중세사연구, (42), pp.1~83 (2016), 중국고중세사학회
- 김병준, "‘시각 문서’에서 ‘시각 석비’로-집안고구려비와 광개토왕비의 형태적 연원-", 木簡과 文字, (18), pp.105~136 (2017), 한국목간학회