본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

풍속 측정 방법에 따른 풍력발전기 출력성능 비교

Comparison of Wind Turbine Power Performance with Different Wind Speed Measurement Methods

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타공학

초록

An experimental investigation was carried out to identify the difference between wind turbine power curves derived from hub height wind speed (HHWS) and rotor equivalent wind speed (REWS) at the Haengwon and Dongbok wind farms on Jeju Island. The terrains of the wind farms were analyzed according to International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61400-12-1 2nd edition. The Haengwon wind farm was analyzed as a simple terrain, while the Dongbok wind farm was analyzed as a complex terrain that needed site calibration before power performance testing. Since the site calibration process for the operating wind farm was not possible, power performance testing was performed without site calibration. The power curves were derived using HHWS and REWS, and the annual energy productions (AEPs) were calculated by applying the Rayleigh wind speed distribution to the power curves. In addition, the normalized revenue by 1 MW for 20 years was calculated using the AEPs. As a result, the average HHWS and REWS at the Haengwon wind farm were 11.68 m/s and 11.64 m/s, while those at the Dongbok wind farm were 8.22 m/s and 8.18 m/s, respectively. The average relative error of the AEP at annual average wind speeds of 5to 11 m/s was 0.96 % for Haengwon wind farm and 1.68 % for the Dongbok wind farm. The average revenue difference at annual average wind speeds of 4 to 11m/s was 55 million Korean won for the Haengwon wind farm and 111 million Korean won for the Dongbok wind farm.

Abstract

An experimental investigation was carried out to identify the difference between wind turbine power curves derived from hub height wind speed (HHWS) and rotor equivalent wind speed (REWS) at the Haengwon and Dongbok wind farms on Jeju Island. The terrains of the wind farms were analyzed according to International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61400-12-1 2nd edition. The Haengwon wind farm was analyzed as a simple terrain, while the Dongbok wind farm was analyzed as a complex terrain that needed site calibration before power performance testing. Since the site calibration process for the operating wind farm was not possible, power performance testing was performed without site calibration. The power curves were derived using HHWS and REWS, and the annual energy productions (AEPs) were calculated by applying the Rayleigh wind speed distribution to the power curves. In addition, the normalized revenue by 1 MW for 20 years was calculated using the AEPs. As a result, the average HHWS and REWS at the Haengwon wind farm were 11.68 m/s and 11.64 m/s, while those at the Dongbok wind farm were 8.22 m/s and 8.18 m/s, respectively. The average relative error of the AEP at annual average wind speeds of 5to 11 m/s was 0.96 % for Haengwon wind farm and 1.68 % for the Dongbok wind farm. The average revenue difference at annual average wind speeds of 4 to 11m/s was 55 million Korean won for the Haengwon wind farm and 111 million Korean won for the Dongbok wind farm.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. Global Wind Report 2021, "Global Wind Energy Council", 44~53 (2021)
  2. "Thirty years growing together" (2021)[URL]
  3. "Vestas History" (2021)[URL]
  4. "MHI Vestas unveils 10MW wind turbine" (2021)[URL]
  5. "GE’s Haliade-X 12MW, most powerful wind turbine operating to date, obtains full type certificate" (2021)[URL]
  6. A. Honrubia, "The influence of wind shear in wind turbine power estimation, Environmental Science", ~ (2010)
  7. Comparison of wind speed measurements over complex terrain using a LIDAR system, Wind Energy Department, "A. Honrubia", Renewable Energy Research institute. Albacete science & Technology Park, ~ (2011)
  8. R. Wagner, "Rotor equivalent wind speed for power curve measurement – comparative exercise for IEA Wind Annex", Journal of Physics, 32, pp.1~10 (2014)
  9. IEC, "Wind energy generation systems-Part12-1: Power performance measurements of electricity producing wind turbines, 61400-12-1Standard", International Electrotechnical Commission, ~ (2017)
  10. Won-Seon Lee, "Linear Wind Analysis for Complex Terrain in Korea", Journal of the Wind Energy, 3(2), pp.60~66 (2012)
  11. Undarmaa Tumenbayar, "Experimental investigation on power performance testing using nacelle lidar measurements over excavated terrain", Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 214, pp.1~16 (2021)
  12. 신동헌, "복잡지형에서 4빔 나셀 라이다 측정 데이터의 정확도 평가", 풍력에너지저널, 9(2), pp.20~27 (2018), 한국풍력에너지학회[DOI]
  13. 김현기, "복잡지형에서의 Wind Shear Exponent 예측", 한국태양에너지학회 논문집, 32(2), pp.87~94 (2012), 한국태양에너지학회[DOI]
  14. 김현구, "IEC 61400 풍력표준을 적용한 제주도 김녕 난류강도 특성분석", 한국태양에너지학회 논문집, 30(6), pp.59~65 (2010), 한국태양에너지학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)