U.S. Alliance Solidarity with S. Korea and Japan : 1993-2008
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The United States alliance with South Korea and Japan faced new challenges in the post-Cold War period. The recent tendency shows that U.S.-South Korea alliance is weakening while U.S.-Japan alliance strengthened showing divergence in the level of alliance solidarity. This study argues that the domestic politics of the allied state frequently influences the U.S. foreign policy decision-making which affects the level of alliance solidarity. I established two hypotheses which are that based on the public opinion perceptions towards the United States and the government ideology policy line of the allied state, the level of alliance solidarity will be determined by the U.S. government. The findings show that the public opinion and government ideology affects the U.S. government perception. Based on this relationship, the outcome is reflected in the degree of alliance solidarity. As a result, this study provides an alternative explanation of the explanatory factors in determining the alliance solidarity.
Abstract
The United States alliance with South Korea and Japan faced new challenges in the post-Cold War period. The recent tendency shows that U.S.-South Korea alliance is weakening while U.S.-Japan alliance strengthened showing divergence in the level of alliance solidarity. This study argues that the domestic politics of the allied state frequently influences the U.S. foreign policy decision-making which affects the level of alliance solidarity. I established two hypotheses which are that based on the public opinion perceptions towards the United States and the government ideology policy line of the allied state, the level of alliance solidarity will be determined by the U.S. government. The findings show that the public opinion and government ideology affects the U.S. government perception. Based on this relationship, the outcome is reflected in the degree of alliance solidarity. As a result, this study provides an alternative explanation of the explanatory factors in determining the alliance solidarity.
참고문헌 (38)
- Cossa, R. A., "US-ROK-Japan : Why a"Virtual Alliance"makes sense", TheKoreanJournalofDefense Analysis, 12(1), pp.67~86 (2000)
- The 3rd public survey on Korea-U.S. relationship, "EAI", East Asia Institute, ~ (2004)
- Fedder, E. H., "The concept of alliance", International Studies Quarterly, 12(1), pp.65~86 (1968)
- Fletcher, M. A., "Teams to survey N. Korea facilities; U.S., China, Russia to send nuclear experts; Bush meets with S. Korean leader", The Washington Post, ~ (2008)
- Glenn H., "The security dilemma in alliance politics", World Politics, 36(4), pp.461~495 (1984)
- Glosserman, B., "Korean attitudes toward the United States: Changing dynamics" (2005), An East Gate Book
- Halloran, R., "Japan sliding", Washington Times.(2008, November 17), ~ (2008)
- Harris, S., "America’s Asian alliances" (2000), The MIT Press
- Holsti, O., "Unity and disintegration in international alliances: Comparative studies" (1973), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Hudson, V. M., "Foreignpolicyanalysis : Classicand contemporary theory" (2007), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
- Keohane, R. O., "Alliances, threats, and the uses of neorealism", International Security, 13(1), pp.169~176 (1988)
- Kim, H. W., "Critical junctures and alliance cohesion: The post-Cold war U.S.-South Korea and U.S.-Japan", Doctor, pp.2008
- Kong, P. W., "Change in the political system of Republic of Korea (ROK)andtheUnited States (U.S.) – ROK alliance", Doctor, pp.2005
- Lee, C. J., "A troubled peace: US policy and the two Koreas" (2006), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Levin, N. D., "Sunshine in Korea" (2002), RAND Corporation
- Lipsky, M., "Protest in city politics: Rent strikes, housing, and the power of the poor" (1970), Rand McNally
- Lohmann, S., "A signaling model of informative and manipulative political action", The American Political Science Review, 87(2), pp.319~333 (1993)
- Mendel, D. H. Jr., "Japan reviews her American alliance", The Public Opinion Quarterly, 30(1), pp.1~18 (1966)
- MOFA, "Overview of Japan-U.S. summit meeting", Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, ~ (2003)
- Moon, C. I., "The United States and Northeast Asian: Debates, issues and new order", pp.167~191 (2008), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc
- Nie, N. H., "Nongovernmental Politics Vol. 4 of Handbook of Political Science" (1975), Addison-Welsley
- Putnam, R. D., "Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games", International Organization, 42(3), pp.427~460 (1988)
- Sanger, D. E., "Bush says Iran speeds output of a bomb fuel", The New York Times(2004, November 21), ~ (2004)
- Song, W. S., "November 16th U.S.-Japan summit meeting and alliance management. State Affairs and Policy, December, 2007", KIDA, ~ (2007)
- Song, Y. S., "Prospect for U. S. -Japan security cooperation", Asian Survey, 35(12), pp.1087~1101 (1995)
- Steinberg, D. I., "The U. S. -ROK alliance : American perspective", International Journal of Korean Studies, 10(2), pp.1~18 (2006)
- "United States Government Printing Office. 1993-2008", ~
- Verba, S., "Participation, preferences, and the war in Vietnam", Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, pp.325~332 (1970)
- Walt, S. M., "Alliance formation and the balance of world power", International Security, 9(4), pp.3~43 (1985)
- Walt, S. M., "The origins of alliances" (1987), Cornell University
- Walt, S. M., "The Perils of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Security" (1995), MIT Press
- Walt, S. M., "Why alliances endure or collapse", Survival, 39(1), pp.156~179 (1997)
- Weitsman, P. A., "Dangerous alliances : Proponents of peace, weapons of war" (2004), Stanford University Press
- Welch, D. A., "Painful choices : A theory of foreign policy change" (2005), Princeton University Press
- Yomiuri Shimbun, "34% of Japanese think Japan-U.S. ties good", The Daily Yomiuri, ~ (2008)
- Yonhap News Agency, "Pentagonsays US would honour South Korean request to with draw troops", BBC Monitoring Asia Pacific, ~ (2003)
- Yoon, S. H., "South Korea’s Kim Young Sam government : Political agendas", Asian Survey, 35(5), pp.513~ (1996)