본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

몽골 역사교육의 동아시아 인식에 대한 고찰-중등『몽골사』교과서의 대외관계 서술의 분석을 중심으로

An Analysis of understanding to East Asia in historical education of Mongolia-Focusing the description of foreign relations through the textbook History of Mongolia

김장구
동북아역사재단 (Northeast Asian History Foundation)|2008.03|동북아역사논총 (Dongbuga Yeoksa Nonchong)|제19호|pp. 117-150

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

중앙아시아Central Asia동아시아 인식몽골 역사교과서유목민과 정주세계사회주의 몽골Mongolia history textbookunderstanding to East Asianomads and the sedentary worldsocialist Mongolia
주제분류역사학

초록

This essay brings into the focus of description of foreign relations through the History of Mongolia as textbook of secondary education. thereby it analyzes historical education of Mongolia and the understanding to East Asia. As the result foreign relations and foreign cognizance about the Mongolia were as follows. The period of ancient nomadic nation continued maintaining cultural and political exchange between East Asia(especially, China), Central Asia and West Asia. 10th~12th centuries were periods of disorder and disruption that the Eurasian Continent was unstable geo-politically. When the Hunnu, Hsien-pi, Turks, Uighurs, Khirghis, and the Kitans were thriving, relations between the nomadic tribes and the sedentary people continued maintaining cultural and political exchange each other as mentioned above. The period of Mongol Empire was the most exchangeable era on nomadic history extensively and the Mongolia played a important role in a variety of exchange. After collapse of the Mogol Empire, 14th~17th century was era of foreign relations which give undue emphasis to the Ming Dynasty in China. The Mongols not only oppressed the Ming Dynasty but also tried to trade with the Ming in order to obtain supplies and materials. But the Ming Dynasty built the great wall and controlled the Mongolia economically. And then the Ching Dynasty which the Manchurian tribe established, conquered the China proper as well as Inner and Outer Mogolia, Zunghar in turn. Accordingly the Mongolia was under the rule of the Ching Dynasty. On the one hand, contemporarily the Mongolia was subjected to the Manchu rule, on the other hand, the former resisted against the latter in order to achieve independence and maintained a sense of belongs that mongolia should unite one. Under the control of the Manchurian tribe, the Mongols who wished independence declared the Mongolia’s independence in 1911, when the collapse of the Ching Dynasty broke out. After the Mongolia achieved the independence and established socialist state system, it was placed under the power of Soviet’s influence and was closely connected with some of socialist states. As socialist Mongolia was intimately associated with socialist states such as the Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, Cuba, and North Korea. The Mongolia keep on having friendly relations of China but impaired relations with the People’s Republic in 1960s when boundary dispute between the Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China took place. Because the Mongolia was on the side of the Soviet Union on the border dispute. With the Mongolia joining the United Nations in 1961, the Mongolia begun to establish diplomatic relation with Great Britain for the first time, and had diplomatic ties with countries in Western Europe. The Mongolia begun to establish diplomatic relations with Japan in 1972, United States of America in 1987, and South Korea in 1990 and thereby made one’s appearance on the stage of international stages. Since the end of 1980s socialism was on the ebb throughout the world, the Mongolia attempted to convert into democratic and free market economy. After that time the Mongolia have cooperated in foreign affairs as family member within the community of nations.

Abstract

This essay brings into the focus of description of foreign relations through the History of Mongolia as textbook of secondary education. thereby it analyzes historical education of Mongolia and the understanding to East Asia. As the result foreign relations and foreign cognizance about the Mongolia were as follows. The period of ancient nomadic nation continued maintaining cultural and political exchange between East Asia(especially, China), Central Asia and West Asia. 10th~12th centuries were periods of disorder and disruption that the Eurasian Continent was unstable geo-politically. When the Hunnu, Hsien-pi, Turks, Uighurs, Khirghis, and the Kitans were thriving, relations between the nomadic tribes and the sedentary people continued maintaining cultural and political exchange each other as mentioned above. The period of Mongol Empire was the most exchangeable era on nomadic history extensively and the Mongolia played a important role in a variety of exchange. After collapse of the Mogol Empire, 14th~17th century was era of foreign relations which give undue emphasis to the Ming Dynasty in China. The Mongols not only oppressed the Ming Dynasty but also tried to trade with the Ming in order to obtain supplies and materials. But the Ming Dynasty built the great wall and controlled the Mongolia economically. And then the Ching Dynasty which the Manchurian tribe established, conquered the China proper as well as Inner and Outer Mogolia, Zunghar in turn. Accordingly the Mongolia was under the rule of the Ching Dynasty. On the one hand, contemporarily the Mongolia was subjected to the Manchu rule, on the other hand, the former resisted against the latter in order to achieve independence and maintained a sense of belongs that mongolia should unite one. Under the control of the Manchurian tribe, the Mongols who wished independence declared the Mongolia’s independence in 1911, when the collapse of the Ching Dynasty broke out. After the Mongolia achieved the independence and established socialist state system, it was placed under the power of Soviet’s influence and was closely connected with some of socialist states. As socialist Mongolia was intimately associated with socialist states such as the Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, Cuba, and North Korea. The Mongolia keep on having friendly relations of China but impaired relations with the People’s Republic in 1960s when boundary dispute between the Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China took place. Because the Mongolia was on the side of the Soviet Union on the border dispute. With the Mongolia joining the United Nations in 1961, the Mongolia begun to establish diplomatic relation with Great Britain for the first time, and had diplomatic ties with countries in Western Europe. The Mongolia begun to establish diplomatic relations with Japan in 1972, United States of America in 1987, and South Korea in 1990 and thereby made one’s appearance on the stage of international stages. Since the end of 1980s socialism was on the ebb throughout the world, the Mongolia attempted to convert into democratic and free market economy. After that time the Mongolia have cooperated in foreign affairs as family member within the community of nations.

참고문헌 (56)

  1. 권영순, "한·몽수교의 배경, 과정 그리고 역사적 의의", 몽골연구, 1, pp.21~28 (1999), 몽골학회
  2. 이평래, "한국에 온 노동자들을 품어야 하는 이유", 경향신문』12월1일자, K11면‘동아시아의 오늘과 내일, ~ (2007)
  3. 이평래, "한·몽 문화 교류를 보는시각", 국제한국학회 학회지, 4 (1999)
  4. "실크로드와 한국문화", pp.123~160, 소나무
  5. 이필영, "한·몽 민속문화의 비교 관점, In 초원의 대서사시-몽골 유목문화", pp.130~135 (1999), 경기도박물관
  6. J. 게렐바드라흐, "몽골의 역사교육：역사교과서에 보이는 동아시아 서술의 특징", 동아시아 역사교과서 국제학술워크숍 동아시아 역사교과서의 주변국 서술과 그 특징, pp.118~129 (2007), 동북아역사재단
  7. 존 K. 페어뱅크, "동양문화사(상)" (1991), 을유문화사
  8. 신채식, "동양사개론" (1993), 삼영사
  9. 오병수, "’동아시아’인식과 세계사교육의 내용구조, In 尹世哲敎授停年紀念歷史學論叢2-『歷史敎育의 方向과 國史敎育", pp.303~328 (2001), 솔
  10. 김성수, "동아시아론의 전개와 역사 텍스트 속의 동아시아", 역사교육, (102), pp.127~161 (2007), 역사교육연구회
  11. 고마츠 히사오, "중앙유라시아의 역사", pp.278~308 (2005), 소나무
  12. 김장구, "람스테트 (G. J. Ramstedt)의 유목민족사 이해와 그 한계 ― 위구르 민족의 간략한 역사의 전사와 번역을 중심으로 ―", 중앙아시아연구, 11, pp.29~50 (2006), 중앙아시아학회
  13. 한정숙, "멀고도 가까운 러시아", 경향신문 12월 8일자, K 11면‘동아시아의 오늘과 내일’, ~ (2007)
  14. 김장구, "중국 역사가들의 몽골사인식" (2006), 고구려연구재단
  15. 윤영인, "중국의 몽골-한족관계연구동향, In 중국의 민족·변강문제", pp.17~44 (2005), 고구려연구재단
  16. 노기식, "중국 역사교과서의 북방민족사 서술, In 중국 역사교과서의 민족·국가·영토문제", pp.57~89 (2006), 동북아역사재단
  17. 오. 바트사이한, "중국 역사학자들의 몽골사 왜곡에 대하여", 고구려연구재단 제1회 국제학술회의『한국사속의 고구려의 위상, pp.399~413 (2004), 고구려연구재단
  18. Sh. Bira, "The Maoist Falsification of the History of the Mongolian People’s Republic and the Historical Truth" (1981), State Publishing House
  19. Ts. 체렝도르지, "현대 몽골 역사학자들의 高麗에 대한 인식", 제1회 주니어 국제 한국학 학술대회『한국학의 과거와 현재, 그리고 21세기의 과제, pp.55~67 (2007), 한국학중앙연구원
  20. Gantulga Ts, "몽골교육문화과학부 검정 11학년제 일반교육학교 8학년용, In 몽골사 Ⅱ" (2005), Admon
  21. 니콜라 디 코스모, "오랑캐의 탄생" (2005), 황금가지
  22. 사와다 이사오, "흉노" (2007), 아이필드
  23. 민병훈, "초원과 오아시스문화-중앙아시아" (2005), 국립중앙박물관
  24. 국립중앙박물관, , 한·몽 공동학술조사 10주년 국제학술심포지엄 초원의 대제국, 흉노 (2007), 국립중앙박물관
  25. 칭걸테, "거란어와 몽골어의 十二支", 알타이학보, 7, pp.153~160 (1997), 한국알타이학회
  26. 이성규, "中華帝國의 팽창과 축소: 그 이념과 실제", 역사학보, (186), pp.87~133 (2005), 역사학회
  27. Arthur N. Waldron, "The Problem of the Great Wall of China", Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 43(2), pp.643~663 (1983)
  28. 스기야마 마사아키, "몽골세계제국" (1999), 신서원
  29. 翁獨健, "斡脫雜考", 燕京學報, 29, pp.201~218 (1941)
  30. 宇野伸浩, "オゴデイ·ハンとムスリム商人", 東洋學報, 70, pp.71~104 (1989)
  31. 김찬영, "元代 中賣寶貨의 意味와 그 特性", 중앙아시아연구, 12, pp.23~46 (2007), 중앙아시아학회
  32. E. Endicott-West, "Merchant Associations in Yu¨an China：The Ortoγ", 2Asia Major (3rd Series), 2(2), pp.127~154 (1989)
  33. Th. T. Allsen, "Prelude to the Western Campaigne：Mongol Military Operations in the Volga-Ural Region, 1217~1237", Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, 3, pp.5~24 (1983)
  34. M. Underdown, "European Knowledge of Korea during the Yu¨an Dynasty", E´udes Mongoles et Sibe´iennes, 27, pp.385~404 (1997)
  35. 薄音湖, "北元與明代蒙古", 內蒙古大學學報(哲學社會科學版), pp.9~12 (1994)
  36. 馬楚堅, "近十年來中國硏究明代蒙古史之回顧, In 明淸邊政與治亂", pp.485~513 (1994), 天津人民出版社
  37. H. Serruys, "The Mongols in China During the Hung-Wu Period, 1368~1398" (1959), l’Institut Belge des Hautes E´ udes Chinoises
  38. H. Serruys, "The Tribute System and Diplomatic Missions, 1400~1600, Bruxelles" (1967), Institut Belge des Hautes Etudes Chinoises
  39. 和田淸, "東亞史硏究(蒙古篇)" (1959), 東洋文庫
  40. 萩原淳平, "明代蒙古史硏究" (1980), 同朋舍
  41. H. Serruys, "Early Lamaism in Mongolia", Oriens Extremus, 10(2), pp.181~216 (1963)
  42. 이평래, "16세기말 이후 몽골불교의 확산과 전개, In 실크로드의 삶과 종교", pp.230~274 (2006), 사계절
  43. 金成修, "17世紀 ‘할하(Qalq-a) 中心論’의 形成과 티벳佛敎", 중앙아시아연구, 7, pp.2~58 (2002), 중앙아시아학회
  44. 이완종, "러시아의 극동진출과 중·러국경획정", 북방사논총, (4), pp.161~213 (2005), 고구려연구재단
  45. Gantulga Ts, "몽골교육문화과학부 검정 11학년제 일반교육학교 9학년용, In 몽골사 Ⅲ" (2006), Admon
  46. 孫賢淑, "外蒙에 관한 三國協定의 분석", 釜山女大史學, 2, pp.39~86 (1984)
  47. 이준희, "칭기스칸의 후예들, 몽골인민공화국의 건국" (2005), 제이앤씨
  48. 이평래, "1911년 외몽골 독립에 대한 중국 연구자들의 시각, In 북방사논총 3호" (2005), 고구려연구재단
  49. R. Rupen, "Russian-Mongol-Chinese Conference", The Journal of Asian Studies, ⅩⅦ(3), pp.537~541 (1958)
  50. 丁載勳, "중학교 사회 교과서 세계사 서술 속의 타자 읽기 ― 북아시아사 서술의 분석을 중심으로 ―", 역사교육, 93(93), pp.1~31 (2005), 역사교육연구회
  51. 이평래, "잃어버린 역사, In 오류와 편견으로 가득한 세계사 교과서 바로 잡기", pp.56~76 (2007), 삼인
  52. 윤영인, "중국의몽골-한족관계연구동향, In 중국의 민족·변강문제", pp.17~44 (2005), 고구려연구재단
  53. 노기식, "중국 역사교과서의 북방민족 사서술, In 중국 역사교과서의 민족·국가·영토 문제", pp.57~89 (2006), 동북아역사재단
  54. 鄭夏賢, "中國의 역사교육에 있어서 少數民族 이해, In 尹世哲敎授停年紀念歷史學論 2-歷史敎育의 方向과 國史敎育", pp.329~355 (2001), 솔
  55. 王柯, "민족과 국가-중국 다민족 통일국가 사상의 계보" (2005), 고구려연구재단
  56. 김장구, "중국역사가들의 몽골사 인식" (2006), 고구려연구재단

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

고등학교 <동아시아사>의 성격과 체계정연pp. 7-34일본 세계사 교육의 동아시아사니타니 사다오(二谷貞夫)pp. 35-54中ㆍ西에 가린 동아시아 : 중국 중등학교 역사교육과 동아시아인식오병수pp. 55-93베트남의 동북아 역사인식-베트남 역사교과서를 통해 살펴봄최병욱pp. 95-116‘王建의 중국 출신설’에 대한 비판적 검토김갑동pp. 153-187
원문 보기