본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

하수처리장에서의 총인 분석 및 처리효율 평가

Analysis and Assessment of Removal Efficiency for T-P in Sewage Treatment

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study was conducted to assess removal efficiency and develop improvement plans for a T-P treatmentplant in the 1st sewage treatment plant in Gwangju. The findings of this study are as follows: among all processes,the T-P removal process achieved the highest efficiency (84%), whereas the T-N removal processshowed the lowest (1.2%). About 77% of the 84% T-P removal efficiency was credited to the sedimentationbasin, indicating that coagulant injection is essential. Comparing coagulants using jar tests found that the optimalPAC input was 20~25 ppm and its T-P removal efficiency was 94~95%, whereas the optimal LAS inputwas 25~30 ppm with T-P removal efficiencies of 84~89%. This shows that PAC can achieve a better removalefficiency than LAS. Although the jar tests suggested the best PAC input of 20~25 ppm, the actual input atthe plant was 28~36 ppm, about 8~11 ppm higher. This may be attributable to the significantly shortened retentiontime in the sedimentation basin due to the high-rate coagulation of an inclination plate settler using microsand. The degrees of coagulation by rapid mixing were measured, and zeta potentials were found moderateranging between -8.44~-8.40 mV. This indicates that a pump injection method should be adopted for the bestcoagulation (zeta potential: 0~+3 mV). Replacing the four existing rapid-mixing coagulant injectors (powerconsumption: 85.6 kW/h) with one device using pump injection (power consumption: 1.5 kW/h) may not onlyimprove T-P removal efficiency but also reduce the annual electricity cost by 60 million won.

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess removal efficiency and develop improvement plans for a T-P treatmentplant in the 1st sewage treatment plant in Gwangju. The findings of this study are as follows: among all processes,the T-P removal process achieved the highest efficiency (84%), whereas the T-N removal processshowed the lowest (1.2%). About 77% of the 84% T-P removal efficiency was credited to the sedimentationbasin, indicating that coagulant injection is essential. Comparing coagulants using jar tests found that the optimalPAC input was 20~25 ppm and its T-P removal efficiency was 94~95%, whereas the optimal LAS inputwas 25~30 ppm with T-P removal efficiencies of 84~89%. This shows that PAC can achieve a better removalefficiency than LAS. Although the jar tests suggested the best PAC input of 20~25 ppm, the actual input atthe plant was 28~36 ppm, about 8~11 ppm higher. This may be attributable to the significantly shortened retentiontime in the sedimentation basin due to the high-rate coagulation of an inclination plate settler using microsand. The degrees of coagulation by rapid mixing were measured, and zeta potentials were found moderateranging between -8.44~-8.40 mV. This indicates that a pump injection method should be adopted for the bestcoagulation (zeta potential: 0~+3 mV). Replacing the four existing rapid-mixing coagulant injectors (powerconsumption: 85.6 kW/h) with one device using pump injection (power consumption: 1.5 kW/h) may not onlyimprove T-P removal efficiency but also reduce the annual electricity cost by 60 million won.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 환경 실무자를 위한 질소·인 처리기술, "신항식", 환경관리연구소, 86~106 (2002)
  2. 하수처리시설 총인 처리강화 시범운영연구, "환경관리공단", ~ (2009)
  3. 한승우, "응집공정을 이용한 하수처리수 중의 인 제거 Mechanism", 대한환경공학회지, 32(8), pp.774~779 (2010), 대한환경공학회
  4. J. Bratby, "Coagulation and Flocculation in Water and Wastewater Treatment", pp.119~149 (2006), IWA Publishing
  5. 황응주, "생물공정 처리수의 PAC (Poly Aluminum Chloride) 응집에 의한 고효율 인 제거 특성", 대한환경공학회지, 31(8), pp.667~672 (2009), 대한환경공학회
  6. EPA Region 10, "Advanced treatment to achieve low concentration of phosphorus", 9~11 (2007)
  7. S. Jeyanayagam, "True confessions of the biological nutrient removal process", Florida water resources journal (2005)
  8. R. D. Reardon, "Tertiary clarifier design concepts and considerations", pp.4453~4466 (2005), WEF Publishing
  9. 박혜영, "총인 수질기준강화를 위한 국내 하수종말처리장의 물리화학적처리 특성조사 및 경제성 분석", 대한환경공학회지, 33(3), pp.212~221 (2011), 대한환경공학회
  10. Metcalf and Eddy, "Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse", pp.599~724 (2004), McGrawHill Publishing
  11. 대림산업, "광주 제1하수처리장 총인처리시설 설치공사운전 및 유지관리지침서" (2012)
  12. 환경부, "수질오염공정시험기준", ~ (2012)
  13. 응집공정 효율향상을 위한 제타전위 적용, "김상은", 서울시수도기술연구소, ~ (1996)
  14. AWWA, "Water Treatment - Principle and Practices of Water Supply Operation", pp.51~84 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)