必需設備理論에 의한 라이선스 拒絶의 規制
Intellectual Property Licensing and the Essential Facility Doctrine
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
Recently there have been some cases concerning Microsoft's monopoly power abuse around the world. In Europe, in 2004, EU Commission ruled that Microsoft had failed to provide rivals with information that they needed to compete fairly in the market for server software. This paper will examine the monopolistic IPR's refusal of license. In principle, IPR owners have the right to refuse to license. However, in some exceptional circumstances, it has been noted that IPR owners are compelled to license. A compulsory license in Patent Act is a good example. In addition, there has been a dispute whether we could apply 'essential facility theory' to license-refusal. Although some scholars would not agree to it because of IPR's nature, I believe that we should regulate the monopolistic owner's license-refusal with essential facility theory. The standpoint of Anti-trust Act's provision has convinced me that this interpretation has a warrant. In order to substantiate my argument, I have analyzed earlier cases regarding these topics. At last, I would argue that Korea should make a specific mechanism to regulate software monopoly powers, by reference to that of Telecommunication, namely essential facility system.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김희수, "시장지배적 사업자의 필수설비 규제에 대한 법경제학적 접근"
- 손승우, "S", W Streaming 技術과 著作權 濫用行爲, 2004, pp.6(3), 297~325[DOI]
- "특허부품의 거래거절을 통한 독점화 행위", 12 (2004), 국제거래법학회
- Case Study-Intel Cases, "Law of Monopolization and Intellectual Property In The Semiconductor Industry -U", 9 (2003), 한국경쟁법학회
- 손영화, "지적재산권행사의 한계에 관한 연구", (15) (2001), 한국비교사법학회
- 송근장, "독점금지법상 지적재산권의 행사-각국의 입법례와 국내 ETRI의 상황-", 1 (1998)
- 심영섭, "네트워크산업의 필수설비원리와 경쟁정책" (2001), 산업연구원
- 이기수, "유럽연합의 시장지배적 지위 남용금지", 13-2 (2003)
- 이대희, "S", W 지적재산권의 권리남용방지와 공정이용 활성화 방안에 관한 연구, ~[DOI]
- 이명호, "정보통신산업의 공정경쟁과 규제정책" (1999), 서울대학교출판부
- 이문지, "기술개발 경쟁의 법적 쟁점 ; 특허권의 남용에 관한 미국의 판례법", 14-2 (2004)
- "저작권의 남용에 관한 미국의 판례법", 13-2 (2003)
- 이종화, "필수설비 규제에 대한 해외 동향 및 시사점" (2003), 정보통신정책연구원
- 정상조, "지적재산권 남용행위에 대한 공정거래법 적용방안" (1998), 공정거래위원회
- 한 철, "공정거래법상의 필수설비원리", 13-2 (2003), 한국경영법률학회
- Boris Rotengerg, "The European Regulation of Communications Software: Building a ＂Platform＂ for Freely Interoperable Digital Expression?", 2004 (2003), ~
- Donna M, Gitter, "The Conflict in the European Community Between Competition Law and Intellectual Property Rights A Call for Lesislative Clarification of the Essential Facilities Doctrine" (2003)
- Frank Fine, "European Community Compulsory Licensing Policy: Heresy Versus Common Sense", 619
- Guy Tritton, "Intellectual Property in Europe" (2002), SWEET & MAXWELL
- Herbert Hovenkamp, "Federal Antitrust Policy : The Law of Competition and Its Practice" (1999)
- Hovenkamp, "IP and Antitrust" (2005), Aspen Law & Business
- John Temple Lang, "The Application of the Essential Facility Doctrine to Intellectual Property Rights under European Competition Law Conference organized by Ecole des Mines de Paris Cerna and University of California at Berkeley School of Law" (2004)
- Justin O'Dell, "Microsoft's Antitrust Problems Under the Law of The European Union", 101 (2001)
- Mark Cooper, "Antitrust as Consumer Protection in the New Economy Lessons from the Microsoft Case" (2001)
- Maureen A. O'Rourke, "Striking a Delicate Balance: Intellectual Property, Antitrust, Contract, and Standardization in the Computer Industry", 1 (1998)
- Paul D.Marquardt, "The Essential Facilities Doctrine and Intellectual Property Rights: A Response to Pitofsky, Patterson, and Hooks" (2003)
- Richard A. Posner, "Economic Analysis of Law" (1997), ASPEN LAW & BUSINESS
- Sergio Baches Opi, "The Application of the Essential Facilities Doctrine to Intellectual Property Licensing in the European Union and The United States: Are Intellectual Property Rights Still Sacrosanct?" (2001)
- William J. Kolasky, "What is competition? a comparison of U.S. and European perspectives"