보험판례와 향후 소비자보호 방안
Analysis of korean insurance law cases and some suggestions in the regard of consumer protection
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Insurance contract is a promise by one person to pay another money or any other thing of value upon the happening of a fortuitous event, beyond the effective control of either party, in which the promisee has an interest apart from the contract. The contract of insurance is the primary illustration of a class of contracts described as uberrimae fidei, that is, of the utmost good faith. As a result, the potential parties to it are bound to volunteer to each other before the contract is concluded information which is material. The requirement of utmost good faith has also been held to apply throughout the contract. This study concentrates on showing the trend of korean insurance law cases. The author has tried to analyse th insurance law cases and to point out the problems that korean courts in regards of consumer protection confront. The korean supreme court should change its attitude forward consumer protection. It should, on the other hand, try to apply the principles of insurance.
Abstract
Insurance contract is a promise by one person to pay another money or any other thing of value upon the happening of a fortuitous event, beyond the effective control of either party, in which the promisee has an interest apart from the contract. The contract of insurance is the primary illustration of a class of contracts described as uberrimae fidei, that is, of the utmost good faith. As a result, the potential parties to it are bound to volunteer to each other before the contract is concluded information which is material. The requirement of utmost good faith has also been held to apply throughout the contract. This study concentrates on showing the trend of korean insurance law cases. The author has tried to analyse th insurance law cases and to point out the problems that korean courts in regards of consumer protection confront. The korean supreme court should change its attitude forward consumer protection. It should, on the other hand, try to apply the principles of insurance.
참고문헌 (30)
- 김선정, "생명보험약관상 자살면책기간경과후의 자살- 최근 일본 판례의 동향을 중심으로-", 보험학회지, (69), pp.187~223 (2004), 한국보험학회
- 김성태, "보험법강론" (2001), 법문사
- 동부화재 법무파트, "인보험 자살면책 약관에 대한 소고", 손해보험, (467) (2007)
- 손지열, "약관의 계약편입과 명시, 설명의무", 민법학논총, 2, pp.302~ (1995)
- 손지열, "보통보험약관에 관한 소고 In: 민사법의 제문제(방순원 고희기념논문집)"
- 양승규, "내용설명이 다른 보통보험약관의 효력", 보험학회지, 34
- 양승규, "보험법" (2005), 삼지원
- 양승규, "수개의 상해보험계약과 통지의무위반의 효과" (2000), 삼지원
- 이기수, "보험ㆍ해상법" (2006), 박영사
- 이은영, "약관규제론" (1994), 박영사
- 임재호, "2005년도 보험법 중요판례의 분석", 상사판례연구, 3통권 : 19 (2006)
- 임정근, "정신질환상태와 자살", 생명보험, (294) (2003)
- 장경환, "손해보험에서의 다수계약통지의무", 보험학회지, 75 (2006)
- 장덕조, "타보험가입사실의 통지의무위반의 효과", 보험학회지, 66 (2003)
- 전우현, "보험자의 보험약관 설명의무", 영남법학, 11(2) (2005)
- 정경영, "다른 생명보험계약 체결사실에 대한 보험계약자의 통지의무", 보험법연구, 5 (2003), 삼지원
- 정찬형, "상법강의(하)" (2007), 박영사
- 정호열, "부활과 고지의 범위", 보험학회지, 60 (2001)
- 채이식, "상법강의(하)" (2003), 박영사
- 최병규, "약관설명의무위반과 계약상대방 의무의 충돌 - 고지의무를 중심으로 -", 경제법연구, 6(1) (2007), 한국경제법학회
- 村上隆吉, "保險法論(一卷)", ~
- 野崎隆幸, "保險契約法論", ~
- Hax, "Grundlagen des Versicherungswesens, Wiesbaden", ~ (1964)
- Manes, "Versicherungswesen, Bd. I, Berlin", ~ (1930)
- Niederleithinger, "Das neue VVG, Baden-Baden", ~ (2007)
- Pr?e, "Das neue Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, VersR 2007, S. 1046 ff", ~ (2007)
- Pr?ss, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, 14. Aufl., M?chen und Berlin", ~ (1963)
- Pr?ss, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, 27. Aufl., M?chen", ~ (2004)
- R?er, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, 2. Aufl., M?chen", ~ (2003)
- Weyers, "Versicherungsvertragsrecht, 2. Aufl., Neuwied?Kriftel?Berlin", ~ (1995)