대기배출가스 중 브로민화합물 측정방법 개선연구
Improving the Method for Measuring Bromine Compounds in Flue Gas
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The method detection limit (MDL) using UV-VIS spectrometry (UV/VIS) is the primary method to detect bromine compounds in the flue gas. However, the level of bromine compounds in the flue gas is 0.6 ppm, reaching 20% of the emission limit of 3.0 ppm, which limits the analysis of low-concentration samples. As per the United States Environmental Protection Agency and official test standards for water pollution, bromine compound analysis was performed using ion chromatography (IC). Hydrogen chloride was analyzed using IC, referencing official test standards for air pollution. Therefore, 0.1 M NaOH and distilled water (D.W.) were applied to the absorption solution of the IC analysis sample. Validation was conducted for IC (D.W.), IC (0.1 M NaOH), and UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH) to improve the analysis method for bromine compounds in the flue gas. The linearity (R2) of the calibration curve for IC (D.W.) satisfied the R2 (0.98 or more) value calculated in the UV/VIS of the official test standards for air pollution. However, the R2 of UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH) and IC (0.1 M NaOH) was not satisfied. In IC (D.W.) analysis results, the average values of MDL, MLQ (minimum level of quantification), accuracy and precision were 0.127 ppm, 0.403 ppm, 3.7%, and 102.9%, respectively. MDL and MLQ showed the lowest concentration compared to the other two methods, and had high accuracy and precision. Regarding the recovery rate by the absorbing liquid, IC (D.W.) was the highest at 93.55%, followed by UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH) and IC (0.1 M NaOH). This study analyzed bromine compounds in flue gas with higher accuracy and precision using the IC (D.W.) method compared to IC (0.1 M NaOH) and UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH).
Abstract
The method detection limit (MDL) using UV-VIS spectrometry (UV/VIS) is the primary method to detect bromine compounds in the flue gas. However, the level of bromine compounds in the flue gas is 0.6 ppm, reaching 20% of the emission limit of 3.0 ppm, which limits the analysis of low-concentration samples. As per the United States Environmental Protection Agency and official test standards for water pollution, bromine compound analysis was performed using ion chromatography (IC). Hydrogen chloride was analyzed using IC, referencing official test standards for air pollution. Therefore, 0.1 M NaOH and distilled water (D.W.) were applied to the absorption solution of the IC analysis sample. Validation was conducted for IC (D.W.), IC (0.1 M NaOH), and UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH) to improve the analysis method for bromine compounds in the flue gas. The linearity (R2) of the calibration curve for IC (D.W.) satisfied the R2 (0.98 or more) value calculated in the UV/VIS of the official test standards for air pollution. However, the R2 of UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH) and IC (0.1 M NaOH) was not satisfied. In IC (D.W.) analysis results, the average values of MDL, MLQ (minimum level of quantification), accuracy and precision were 0.127 ppm, 0.403 ppm, 3.7%, and 102.9%, respectively. MDL and MLQ showed the lowest concentration compared to the other two methods, and had high accuracy and precision. Regarding the recovery rate by the absorbing liquid, IC (D.W.) was the highest at 93.55%, followed by UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH) and IC (0.1 M NaOH). This study analyzed bromine compounds in flue gas with higher accuracy and precision using the IC (D.W.) method compared to IC (0.1 M NaOH) and UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH).
참고문헌 (11)
- 국립환경과학원, "대기오염공정시험기준 ES 01502. 1c", 1~11 (2021)
- 환경보전협회, "오존층파괴와 기후변화", 10~15 (1998)
- 환경부, "오존층 보호를 위한 특정물질의 제조규제 등에 관한 법률 시행령", 대통령령 제32981호, ~ (2022)
- 국립환경과학원, "대기오염공정시험기준 ES 01502. b", 제2021-61호, 1, ~ (2021)
- 국립환경과학원, "수질오염공정시험기준 ES 04350. 1b", 제2021-93호, 1~8 (2021)
- US Environmental protection agency, "Method 26", 1~13 (2017)
- "화학물질배출이동량조사" (2022), 환경부[URL]
- 연구개발특구진흥재단, "브롬 시장", 1~17 (2020)
- KOLAS, "화학적 시험방법의 유효성 확인을 위한 지침", ~ (2012)
- 식품의약품안전청, "의약품등 시험방법 검증 가이드 라인 적용을 위한 해설서", ~ (2012)
- 황종연, "시험 · 검사방법의 유효성 검증 방법 비교", 환경분석과 독성보건, 22(3), pp.104~116 (2019), 한국환경분석학회
