안산 도심지 PM10, PM2.5 및 PM1.0 비율 분포 특성
Annual Variations of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1.0 Fraction at an Urban Sitein Ansan, Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines particulate matter (PM) concentrations, specifically PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0, at an urban site in Ansan, South Korea. Three BAM-1020 continuous monitors measured PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 hourly from January to December 2021, with data acquisition rates of 97.1%, 97.3%, and 93.4%, respectively. Average annual concentrations were 45.7±48.4 μg/m³ (PM10), 26.4±22.7 μg/m³ (PM2.5), and 18.5±14.5 μg/m³ (PM1.0). PM10 was 91% of the annual air quality standard, while PM2.5 exceeded this standard by 176%, indicating severe pollution. Statistical analyses using probability density function (PDF) and cumulative distribution function (CDF) showed 98.5% of data converged at 150 μg/m³ (PM10), 75 μg/m³ (PM2.5), and 50 μg/m³ (PM1.0), with the remaining 1.5% corresponding to approximately 131 hours, annually. In 2021, all six observed yellow dust events occurred in spring (March to May). PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 concentrations increased from January to March, peaked in March, decreased until September, and rose again. The coarse fraction ratio increased stepwise from February to May, likely due to yellow dust and episodes of high PM concentration in the spring. The PM1.0 concentration was higher in summer and fall compared with that in spring and winter. The PM1.0/PM2.5 ratio was highest in summer and fall even though the annual PM1.0 concentration was lowest, suggesting a higher secondary formation rate of fine particles during these periods. This underscores the need for further scientific investigation on PM1.0. The study provides insights into the simultaneous observation and distribution characteristics of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0, highlighting the mass concentration, distribution, and ratio of PM1.0. These findings are crucial for understanding PM distribution in Ansan, an industrial complex, and can serve as essential data for chemical composition comparisons, data validation, public health strategies, and cost-benefit analyses for regional PM improvement.
Abstract
This study examines particulate matter (PM) concentrations, specifically PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0, at an urban site in Ansan, South Korea. Three BAM-1020 continuous monitors measured PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 hourly from January to December 2021, with data acquisition rates of 97.1%, 97.3%, and 93.4%, respectively. Average annual concentrations were 45.7±48.4 μg/m³ (PM10), 26.4±22.7 μg/m³ (PM2.5), and 18.5±14.5 μg/m³ (PM1.0). PM10 was 91% of the annual air quality standard, while PM2.5 exceeded this standard by 176%, indicating severe pollution. Statistical analyses using probability density function (PDF) and cumulative distribution function (CDF) showed 98.5% of data converged at 150 μg/m³ (PM10), 75 μg/m³ (PM2.5), and 50 μg/m³ (PM1.0), with the remaining 1.5% corresponding to approximately 131 hours, annually. In 2021, all six observed yellow dust events occurred in spring (March to May). PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 concentrations increased from January to March, peaked in March, decreased until September, and rose again. The coarse fraction ratio increased stepwise from February to May, likely due to yellow dust and episodes of high PM concentration in the spring. The PM1.0 concentration was higher in summer and fall compared with that in spring and winter. The PM1.0/PM2.5 ratio was highest in summer and fall even though the annual PM1.0 concentration was lowest, suggesting a higher secondary formation rate of fine particles during these periods. This underscores the need for further scientific investigation on PM1.0. The study provides insights into the simultaneous observation and distribution characteristics of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0, highlighting the mass concentration, distribution, and ratio of PM1.0. These findings are crucial for understanding PM distribution in Ansan, an industrial complex, and can serve as essential data for chemical composition comparisons, data validation, public health strategies, and cost-benefit analyses for regional PM improvement.
참고문헌 (25)
- 2021년 대기오염집중측정소 연간 운 영결과보고서, "국립환경과학원", ~ (2022)
- 한상의, "서울시 대기 중 초미세먼지(PM2. 5)질 량과 화학성분 농도의 장기 변동 추이", 한국대기환경 학회지, 31(2), pp.143~156 (2015)
- 여민주, "우리나라 미세먼지 농도 추이와 고농 도 발생 현황", 한국대기환경학회지, 35(2), pp.249~264 (2019)
- 박종성, "안산 도심지 계절별 PM1 화학 적 특성", 환경분석과 독성보건, 26(3), pp.97~109 (2023)
- W. Zhou, "A review of aerosol chemistry in Asia : insights from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements", Environmental Science : Processes & Impacts, 22(8), pp.1616~1653 (2020)
- 2022년 대기오염집중측정소 연간 운영결과보고서, "국립환경과학원", ~ (2021)
- 국립환경과학원, "대기환경월보 2023년 2월", ~ (2023)
- 김용표, "수도권 대기 미세먼지 1999-2008년 추이 분석", 환경영향평가, 19(1), pp.59~74 (2010)
- 김창혁, "고농도 PM2.5 발생 시 국내외 영향에 따른 산업단지 인근 지역의 PM2.5 특 성 분석", 한국대기환경학회지, 39(1), pp.62~76 (2023)
- 황인조, "EPA-PMF 모델을 이용한 집중측정소 24시간 PM2. 5 자료에 대한 오염원 기여도 추정", 한국대기환경학회지, 36(5), pp.620~632 (2020)
- 김주애, "2013~2016년 제주 PM2. 5 화학조성 변화 및 고농도 발생특성", 한국대기환경학회지, 36(3), pp.388~403 (2020)
- 유근혜, "겨울 및 여름철 백 령도와 서울에서 측정한 PM2. 5 특성", 한국대기환경학회지, 34(1), pp.38~55 (2018)
- V. Ariola, "Elemental characterization of PM10, PM2. 5 and PM1 in the town of Genoa(Italy)", Chemosphere, 62(2), pp.226~232 (2006)
- G. Buonanno, "Uncertainty budget of the SMPS-APS system in the measurement of PM1, PM2. 5, PM10", Aerosol Science and Technology, 43(11), pp.1130~1141 (2009)
- Y. Li, "Variations in PM10, PM2. 5 and PM1. 0 in an urban area of the Sichuan Basin and their relation to meteorological factors", Atmosphere, 6(1), pp.150~163 (2015)
- C. Theodosi, "Mass and chemical composition of size-segregated aerosols(PM1, PM2. 5, PM10)over Athens, Greece : local versus regional sources", Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(22), pp.11895~11911 (2011)
- S. Tiwari, "Variations in mass of the PM10, PM2. 5 and PM1 during the Monsoon and the winter at New Delhi", Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 22(1), pp.20~29 (2012)
- J. Han, "Characterization of PM2. 5 mass in relation to PM1. 0 and PM10 in Megacity Seoul", Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment, 16(1), pp.2021124~ (2022)
- 박미경, "PM2. 5 자동측정장비 비교 및 정도관리 방안", 한국대기환경학회지, 33(6), pp.616~625 (2017)
- 배현주, "서울시 미세먼지(PM10)와 초미세먼지(PM2. 5)의 단기노출로 인한 사망영향", 한국환경보건학회지, 40(5), pp.346~354 (2014)
- 김기현, "PM2. 5, PM10, TSP의 시간대별 관측결과에 기초한 황사기간중 분진의 분포특성에 대한 고찰 : 서울시의 4대 관측점을 중심으로 한 2001년 봄철 황사 기간에 대한 사례연구", 한국대기환경학회지, 18(5), pp.419~426 (2002)
- "기상청" (2023)[URL]
- 문찬석, "황사 발생과 대기 중 PM10, PM2.5, Cd, Pd 농도의 상관성", 한국환경보건학회지, 46(5), pp.532~538 (2020)
- 남기표, "동아시아 지역의 계절별 기상 패턴에 따른 우리나라 PM2. 5 농도 및 기여도 특성 분석 : 2015년 집중측정 기간을 중심으로", 환경영향평가, 28(3), pp.183~200 (2019)
- 이태정, "서울지역 PM2. 5 오염원의 시 계열적 기여도 평가와 헤이즈의 유형분류", 한국대기환 경학회지, 35(1), pp.97~124 (2019)