오스틴의 『설득』에 나타난 마음읽기와 책임
Mind Reading and Responsibility in Austen’s Persuasion
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to some cognitive literary theorists, Austen was particularly innovative in analyzing how her characters follow the workings of each other’s minds, as Anne in Persuasion is capable of considering five levels of meta-knowledge. In advancing this view, this essay examines that this novel’s moral outlook is as much a question of form as of content, and that language—especially its formal dimension of word arrangement and sentence structure of the text─is the bearer of moral content. This paper also suggests Persuasion’s meaning is not exhausted by mind-reading involving a primary capacity for reading pre-existing mental states. In addition to individualistic mind-reading, Austen’s text represents interpersonal mind-shaping practice, wherein characters come to form their minds in ordinary interpersonal relationships.
Abstract
According to some cognitive literary theorists, Austen was particularly innovative in analyzing how her characters follow the workings of each other’s minds, as Anne in Persuasion is capable of considering five levels of meta-knowledge. In advancing this view, this essay examines that this novel’s moral outlook is as much a question of form as of content, and that language—especially its formal dimension of word arrangement and sentence structure of the text─is the bearer of moral content. This paper also suggests Persuasion’s meaning is not exhausted by mind-reading involving a primary capacity for reading pre-existing mental states. In addition to individualistic mind-reading, Austen’s text represents interpersonal mind-shaping practice, wherein characters come to form their minds in ordinary interpersonal relationships.
참고문헌 (24)
- Abramson, Kate, "Love as a Reactive Emotion", The Philosophical Quarterly, 61(245), pp.673~699 (2011)
- Austen, Jane, "Emma" (2005), Cambridge UP
- Austen, Jane, "Persuasion" (1965), Penguin
- Austen, Jane, "The Novel of Jane Austen. Vol 1" (1933), Oxford UP
- Austen, Jane, "Jane Austen’s Letters" (1995), Oxford UP
- Baron, Marcia, "Ethical Theory: Character and Virtue", pp.259~281 (1988), University of Notre Dame Press
- Butte, George, "I Know That You Know That I Know: Narrating Subjects from Moll Flanders to Marnie" (2004), The Ohio State University Press
- Clark, Andy, "The Extended Mind", Analysis, 58(1), pp.7~19 (1998)
- Davies, Martin, "Folk Psychology: The Theory of Mind Debate" (1995), Blackwell
- Knox-Shaw, Peter, "Jane Austen and the Enlightenment" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Gallagher, Shaun, "Direct Perception in the Intersubjective Context", Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), pp.535~543 (2008)
- Hutto, Daniel, "Rethinking Commonsense Psychology" (2007), Pal-grave Macmillan
- Morgan, Susan, "In the Meantime" (1980), U of Chicago P
- Palmer, Alan, "Social Minds in the Novel" (2010), Ohio State University Press
- Ryle, Gilbert, "Collected Papers 1, Critical Essays", pp.266~291 (1990), Thoemmes Press
- Strawson, Peter, "Free Will", pp.59~80 (1982), Oxford UP
- Velleman, David, "Love as a Moral Emotion", Ethics, 109, pp.338~374 (1999)
- Watson, Gary, "Agency and Answerability" (2004), Clarendon Press
- Williams, Bernard, "Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973-80", pp.44~45 (1981), Cambridge University Press
- Wood, James, "How Fiction Works" (2008), Jonathan Cape
- Zahavi, Dan, "Simulation, Projection and Empathy", Consciousness and Cognition, 17, pp.514~522 (2008)
- Zawidzki, T. Wieslaw, "The Function of Folk Psychology: Mind Reading or Mind Shaping?", Philosophical Explorations, 11(3), pp.193~210 (2008)
- Zunshine, Liza. a., "Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel" (2006), The Ohio State University Press
- Zunshine, Liza. b., "Sociocognitive Complexity", NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction, 45(1), pp.13~18 (2012)