본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Stop Consonant Excrescence in English and Dutch

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

In modern day English, a consonant, mainly a stop plosive, is embedded between two consonants in a cluster for ease of the articulation. Interestingly, in a specific context where a nasal is abutting with an obstruent within or across a morpheme boundary, a homorganic stop is intervened between them, resulting in [mp], [nt] and [ŋk] when the obstruent preceded by a nasal is voiceless. However, when voiced, a voiced stop is added, instead. Here what noticed is that the inserted segment is only a stop plosive and, further, feature agreement takes place in both place and voice. Homorganicity of the added stop stems from the preceding nasal sound while voicing from the following obstruent, a stop plosive or a buccal fricative. Unlike Warner’s (2002) LCC-based account for the stop intrusion of Dutch under Parallel OT, a phonotactic constraint *NCFric bans any sequence of a nasal followed by a fricative on the surface. In addition, feature agreement constraints dominating place and voice require the inserted stop share the same place and voice with its neighboring sounds. Given the fact that a stop plosive is only a beneficiary among others in this specific context, Dep-Seg[Cont] disfavors a segment holding a continuant characteristic such as vowels, fricatives and approximants. These constraints and their interaction provide a unified analysis on stop excrescence in English as well as Dutch with no analytic chaos.

Abstract

In modern day English, a consonant, mainly a stop plosive, is embedded between two consonants in a cluster for ease of the articulation. Interestingly, in a specific context where a nasal is abutting with an obstruent within or across a morpheme boundary, a homorganic stop is intervened between them, resulting in [mp], [nt] and [ŋk] when the obstruent preceded by a nasal is voiceless. However, when voiced, a voiced stop is added, instead. Here what noticed is that the inserted segment is only a stop plosive and, further, feature agreement takes place in both place and voice. Homorganicity of the added stop stems from the preceding nasal sound while voicing from the following obstruent, a stop plosive or a buccal fricative. Unlike Warner’s (2002) LCC-based account for the stop intrusion of Dutch under Parallel OT, a phonotactic constraint *NCFric bans any sequence of a nasal followed by a fricative on the surface. In addition, feature agreement constraints dominating place and voice require the inserted stop share the same place and voice with its neighboring sounds. Given the fact that a stop plosive is only a beneficiary among others in this specific context, Dep-Seg[Cont] disfavors a segment holding a continuant characteristic such as vowels, fricatives and approximants. These constraints and their interaction provide a unified analysis on stop excrescence in English as well as Dutch with no analytic chaos.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Alderete, John, "Dissimilation as Local Conjunction", Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 27, pp.17~31 (1997)
  2. Ali, Hadeel, "Epenthesis in English and Arabic: A Contrastive Study", Journal of Tikrit University for the Humanities, 18(6), pp.648~660 (2011)[DOI]
  3. Baković, Eric, "Jorge Hankamer WebFest" (2000), Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Cruz
  4. Baković, Eric, "Harmony, Dominance, and Control", Ph.D., pp.2000
  5. Beckman, Jill, "Positional Faithfulness: An Optimality Theoretic Treatment of Phonological Asymmetries" (1999), Garland Press
  6. Bronstein, Arther, "The Pronunciation of American English" (1960), Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.
  7. Clements, Nick, "The Internal Organization of Speech Sounds", The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 7, pp.245~317 (1995)
  8. Crowley, Terry, "An Introduction to Historical Linguistics" (2010), Oxford University Press
  9. Feldscher, Cara, "Excrescent Stops in American English", Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 2, pp.1~15 (2017)
  10. Iverson, Gregory, "On the Category Supralaryngeal", Phonology, 6, pp.285~303 (1989)
  11. Kager, René, "Optimality Theory" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  12. Kirchner, Robert, "Synchronic Chain Shifts in Optimality Theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 27, pp.341~350 (1996)
  13. Lass, Roger, "Phonology: An Introduction to Basic Concepts" (1984), Cambridge University Press
  14. Lee, Yongsung, "Introduction to the Sound Study of English" (2000), PUFS Press
  15. Lombardi, Linda, "Positional Faithfulness and Voicing Assimilation in Optimality Theory", NLLT, 17, pp.267~302 (1999)
  16. Lombardi, Linda, "Segmental Phonology in Optimality Theory: Constraints and Representations" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  17. McCarthy, John, "University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18", pp.249~384 (1995), GLSA Publication
  18. Naidoo, Shamila, "Intrusive Stop Formation in Zulu: an Application of Feature Geometry Theory", Ph.D., pp.2005
  19. Ohala, John, "Phonetic Explanations for Nasal Sound Patterns", Nasalfest: Papers from a Symposium on Nasals and Nasalization, pp.289~316 (1975)
  20. Ohala, John, "Emergent Stops", Proceedings of the 4th Seoul International Conference on Linguistics, pp.84~91 (1997)
  21. Ohala, John, "The Phonetics of Nasal Phonology: Theorems and Data", Phonetics and Phonology, 5, pp.225~249 (1993)
  22. Piggott, Glyne, "The Phonology of Epenthetic Segments", Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 30(4), pp.415~451 (1985)
  23. Prince, Alan, "Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar", Ms., pp.1993
  24. Prince, Alan, "Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar" (2004), Blackwell
  25. Pulleyblank, Douglas, "Harmony Drivers: No Disagreement Allowed", Proceedings of the Twenty-Eight Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (2004), Berkeley Linguistics Society
  26. Smolensky, Paul, "Harmony, Markedness, and Phonological Activity", Handout to talk presented at Rutgers Optimality Workshop (1993)
  27. Smolensky, Paul, "On the Internal Structure of the Constraint Component Con of UG", ROA 86-0000, ~ (1995)
  28. and Optimal Epenthetic Consonants, "Language Sciences", 2007, 451~476
  29. Urbanczyk, Suzanne, "Reduplication Form and the Root-Affix Asymmetry", NLLT, 24, pp.179~240 (2005)
  30. Warner, Natasha, "The Phonology of Epenthetic Stops: Implications for the Phonetics-Phonology Interface in Optimality Theory", Linguistics, 40, pp.1~28 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)