Missing Contents after Spell-Out
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper proposes an assumption on a complementizer (comp) that/Φthat,: a comp that/φthat merges externally with a head C in a main clause or in an embedded one, either having its phonetic contents (PC) but missing its semantic contents (SC) or missing both its PC and SC after Spell-Out. This paper also proposes an assumption on a comp for/Φfor: a comp for/φfor merges externally with a head C in an infinitival clause, either having its PC but missing its SC or missing both its PC and SC after Spell-Out. Besides, a prepositional link (PL) to/Φto has either its PC but misses its SC or misses both its PC and SC except for in the passive voice. Finally, this paper argues that lexical items such as a Φpreposition which merges externally with a bare-NP adverb or a gerund, and a common imperative subject you miss their PC but still have their SC after Spell-Out in present-day English.
Abstract
This paper proposes an assumption on a complementizer (comp) that/Φthat,: a comp that/φthat merges externally with a head C in a main clause or in an embedded one, either having its phonetic contents (PC) but missing its semantic contents (SC) or missing both its PC and SC after Spell-Out. This paper also proposes an assumption on a comp for/Φfor: a comp for/φfor merges externally with a head C in an infinitival clause, either having its PC but missing its SC or missing both its PC and SC after Spell-Out. Besides, a prepositional link (PL) to/Φto has either its PC but misses its SC or misses both its PC and SC except for in the passive voice. Finally, this paper argues that lexical items such as a Φpreposition which merges externally with a bare-NP adverb or a gerund, and a common imperative subject you miss their PC but still have their SC after Spell-Out in present-day English.
참고문헌 (19)
- Cassidy F. G., "Old English", pp.26~80 (1971), Holt, Rinehart, and Winston Inc.
- Chomsky, N., "Aspects of the Theory of syntax", pp.144~145, MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "On WH-Movement in : Formal Syntax", pp.71~132 (1977), Academic Press
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding", pp.66~69 (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program", pp.351~353 (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework in : Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "On Phase", pp.1~27 (2005), MIT
- Chomsky, N., "Approaching UG from below", pp.1~18 (2006), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Filters and Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.425~504 (1977)
- Diamond, R. E., "Old English,: Grammar and Reader", pp.25~28 (1970), Wayne State UP
- Kayne, R. S., "On Certain Differences between French and English", Linguistic Inquiry, 12, pp.349~371 (1981)
- Larson, R. K., "Bare-NP Adverbs", Linguistic Inquiry, 16(4), pp.595~621 (1985)
- Larson, R. K., "Missing Prepositions and the Analysis of English Free Relative Clauses", Linguistic Inquiry, 18(2), pp.239~266 (1987)
- Moore, S. T., "The Elements of Old English. Ann Arbor", pp.49~93 (1965), The George Wahr Publishing Co.
- Mossé, F., "A Handbook of Middle English", pp.99~109 (1975), The Hopkins UP
- Postal, P. M., "On Raising", pp.176~205 (1974), MIP Press
- Postal, P. M., "Parasitic and Pseudoparasitic Gaps", Linguisric Inquiry, 25(1), pp.63~117 (1994)
- Redford, A., "Transformational Grammar", pp.499~502 (1988), Cambridge UP
- Rosenbaum, P. S., "The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions", pp.1~128 (1967), MIT Press