본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

특허제품의 양도와 특허권의 효력

A Study on Sale of a Patented Item and Patent Right

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The first unrestricted sale of a patented item exhausts the patentee's control over that particular item. It generally is asserted as an affirmative defense to charges of patent infringement. It is called the doctrine of patent exhaustion. Especially, this article focused on the problem whether conditional sale of a patented item exhausts the patentee's control over that particular item. There are several decisions on denying the doctrine of patent exhaustion in U.S. courts. But most Japanese courts approved the doctrine of patent exhaustion in conditional sale of a patented item. But there is no decisions on such a case in Korean court. I agree U.S. court opnion. Futhermore, I think that the doctrine of patent exhaustion in conditional sale of a patented item should be denyed under several special requirements. these requirements should be studied more and more in the future.

Abstract

The first unrestricted sale of a patented item exhausts the patentee's control over that particular item. It generally is asserted as an affirmative defense to charges of patent infringement. It is called the doctrine of patent exhaustion. Especially, this article focused on the problem whether conditional sale of a patented item exhausts the patentee's control over that particular item. There are several decisions on denying the doctrine of patent exhaustion in U.S. courts. But most Japanese courts approved the doctrine of patent exhaustion in conditional sale of a patented item. But there is no decisions on such a case in Korean court. I agree U.S. court opnion. Futhermore, I think that the doctrine of patent exhaustion in conditional sale of a patented item should be denyed under several special requirements. these requirements should be studied more and more in the future.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 조영선, "특허법" (2011), 박영사
  2. 김동준, "특허권의 소진에 관한 미국판례 동향", 특허소송연구, 4 (2008)
  3. 윤선희, "특허권소진의 의의와 그 논거에 관한 연구", 산업재산권, (27), pp.133~172 (2008), 한국산업재산권법학회
  4. 황성필, "Quanta v. LG 판결을 반영하는 특허 라이센싱 전략(특허권소진이론의 적용범위와 조건부계약에 의한 배제 가능성)", 지식재산연구, 4(1) (2009)
  5. 이경란, "지적재산권 중요판결 요약집-침해소송편-" (2006), 지적재산자료연구원
  6. 田村善之, "特許法の理論" (2009), 有斐閣
  7. 中山信弘, "工業所有權法(上)" (2000), 弘文堂
  8. 渡邊肇, "ライセンス" (2009), 中央經濟社
  9. 椙山敬士, "ライセンス契約" (2007), 日本評論社
  10. 本多 廣和, "特許製品の 讓渡と 特許權者の 留保, In 知的財産法の新しぃ 流れ(片山英二先生還曆記念論文集)" (2010), 靑林書院

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)