본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

자살시 보험금 지급과 지급보험금의 종류 - 독일의 논의와의 비교를 중심으로 -

Payment of insurance money in the case of suicide and the arts of insurance money - focused on the comparative study with discussions in germany -

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In general, the insurer is indemnified in the case of suicide. But the life insurance terms allows the payment of insurance money in the case of suicide after 2 or 3 years. The arts of insurance money to pay is not clarified. Therefore there are disputes between the insurance company and consumer (and also consumer protection group). The problem is whether the insurance company should pay disaster death - insurance money or general death - insurance money. This is very difficult problem. The life insurance contract terms was not clear. By the way, the Financial Supervisory Service was involved. After April 2010, the contract terms was changed clearly. The Financial Supervisory Service has worried itself. But the Financial Supervisory Service has decided that the insurance company should pay disaster death - insurance money. But it can not be justified. The suicide is not disaster. The german insurance law(VVG)(§ 161) regulates that the insurance company should pat insurance money when the insured commit suicide after 3 years. The german scholars interpret that § 161 VVG should not be applied to accident insurance. That means that the suicide is not disaster. Therefore, we can also interpret that the insurance company should pay general death - insurance money in case of suicide. This paper has analysed the proceedings of this affair and domestic law and court decision situation. Furthermore, this paper has done the comparative legal study with german laws and interpretations on them. And then it has drawn the final results. The final results is that the suicide is not disaster and the insurance company should pay general death - insurance money in the case of suicide after 2 years.

Abstract

In general, the insurer is indemnified in the case of suicide. But the life insurance terms allows the payment of insurance money in the case of suicide after 2 or 3 years. The arts of insurance money to pay is not clarified. Therefore there are disputes between the insurance company and consumer (and also consumer protection group). The problem is whether the insurance company should pay disaster death - insurance money or general death - insurance money. This is very difficult problem. The life insurance contract terms was not clear. By the way, the Financial Supervisory Service was involved. After April 2010, the contract terms was changed clearly. The Financial Supervisory Service has worried itself. But the Financial Supervisory Service has decided that the insurance company should pay disaster death - insurance money. But it can not be justified. The suicide is not disaster. The german insurance law(VVG)(§ 161) regulates that the insurance company should pat insurance money when the insured commit suicide after 3 years. The german scholars interpret that § 161 VVG should not be applied to accident insurance. That means that the suicide is not disaster. Therefore, we can also interpret that the insurance company should pay general death - insurance money in case of suicide. This paper has analysed the proceedings of this affair and domestic law and court decision situation. Furthermore, this paper has done the comparative legal study with german laws and interpretations on them. And then it has drawn the final results. The final results is that the suicide is not disaster and the insurance company should pay general death - insurance money in the case of suicide after 2 years.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 강위두, "상법강의(하)" (2004), 형설출판사
  2. 권오승, "경제법" (2011), 법문사
  3. 김성태, "보험법강론" (2001), 법문사
  4. 김은경, "생명보험에서 자살면책조항의 법적 비교고찰", 보험법연구, 7(1) (2013)
  5. 박세민, "보험법" (2013), 박영사
  6. 박영준, "생명보험의 면책사유에 대한 소고 – 비교법적 고찰을 중심으로-", 보험법연구, 7(2) (2013)
  7. 박은경, "보험해상법 강론" (2004), 신지서원
  8. 양승규, "보험법" (2005), 삼지원
  9. 유주선, "보험법" (2013), 청목출판사
  10. 이기수, "상법총칙·상행위법" (2010), 박영사
  11. 이기수, "보험․해상법" (2008), 박영사
  12. 이필규, "2009년 독일 보험계약법" (2009), 세창출판사
  13. 장덕조, "보험법" (2011), 법문사
  14. 정찬형, "상법강의(하)" (2014), 박영사
  15. 조정명, "면책기간 이후 자살과 재해사망보험금 지급여부,「경영환경의 변화와 상사법의 최근이슈", 한국경영법률학회 2014년 추계학술대회자료집 (2014)
  16. 채이식, "상법강의(하)" (2003), 박영사
  17. 최기원, "보험법" (2002), 박영사
  18. 최병규, "생명보험과 자살면책에 관한 한독비교연구", 기업법연구, 26(4), pp.185~206 (2012), 한국기업법학회
  19. 최준선, "보험·해상·항공운송법" (2013), 삼영사
  20. Beckmann, "Versicherungsrechts-Handbuch", ~ (2004)
  21. Bruck, "VVG" (1961)
  22. Bruck, "VVG" (2010)
  23. Honsel, "Berliner Kommentar zum VVG", ~ (1999)
  24. Langheid, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, Münchener Kommentar" (2011)
  25. Larenz, "Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts" (2004)
  26. Looschelders, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz" (2010)
  27. Palandt, "Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch" (2010)
  28. Prölss, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz" (2004)
  29. Prölss, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz" (2010)
  30. Römer, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz" (2014)
  31. Rüffer, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz" (2009)
  32. Schwintowski, "Praxiskommentar zum Versicherungs- vertragsrecht" (2008)
  33. Wandt, "Versicherungsrecht" (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)