본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

산업별 노동조합 지회와 기업별 노동조합 간의 조직형태 변경에 관한 고찰 - 서울고등법원 2012.9.21. 선고 2011나79540 판결을 중심으로 -

Studies on the Changes in the Organizational Structures between the Industrial Union Branches and the Enterprise Unions

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Labor union, as a subject to enjoy the freedom of the right to form and change the organization, has the right to do so under the con- stitutional law. Current Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act states the structural changes as a matter which requires the resolution by the general meeting, and fixes the quorum. The purpose of the structure changes system under the Trade Union Law is to avoid the tedious process to disband or establish of a trade unions, and to make the change of the organizational form efficiently. Recently the system is being utilized as a means to change its organizational structure by industrial union branches to separate from the labor union to form the enterprise unions. In the case, although the court judgment did not specifically review the concept, the requirement and the effect of the changes in the structure, saw “A” branch as a division of the trans-enterprise and stated that such division of the industryㆍcraftㆍregional unit unions cannot be the subject to change the organizational structure because it lacks the independent power to collective bargain or to sign collective agreements. Therefore the court rescinded the bylaws set from the general meetings of the union. However, the ruling in the case can be subject to criticism because it can limit the freedom to collectively act and thus could infringe the right to pursuit happiness by interpreting the nature of the labor union too firmly and by neglecting to substantially consider the majorities union members’ intension and purpose. Labor unions represent the interests of their member employees and their role most properly comply with the spirit of the Constitution guarantees when they can properly defend such interests. Internal democracy of the union has the utmost importance to bring this about and the democracy of the union can be met when the majority opinion of the union members has been reflected. The court likewise need to consider such actively.

Abstract

Labor union, as a subject to enjoy the freedom of the right to form and change the organization, has the right to do so under the con- stitutional law. Current Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act states the structural changes as a matter which requires the resolution by the general meeting, and fixes the quorum. The purpose of the structure changes system under the Trade Union Law is to avoid the tedious process to disband or establish of a trade unions, and to make the change of the organizational form efficiently. Recently the system is being utilized as a means to change its organizational structure by industrial union branches to separate from the labor union to form the enterprise unions. In the case, although the court judgment did not specifically review the concept, the requirement and the effect of the changes in the structure, saw “A” branch as a division of the trans-enterprise and stated that such division of the industryㆍcraftㆍregional unit unions cannot be the subject to change the organizational structure because it lacks the independent power to collective bargain or to sign collective agreements. Therefore the court rescinded the bylaws set from the general meetings of the union. However, the ruling in the case can be subject to criticism because it can limit the freedom to collectively act and thus could infringe the right to pursuit happiness by interpreting the nature of the labor union too firmly and by neglecting to substantially consider the majorities union members’ intension and purpose. Labor unions represent the interests of their member employees and their role most properly comply with the spirit of the Constitution guarantees when they can properly defend such interests. Internal democracy of the union has the utmost importance to bring this about and the democracy of the union can be met when the majority opinion of the union members has been reflected. The court likewise need to consider such actively.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 강선희, "노동판례리뷰 2012-2013" (2014), 한국노동연구원
  2. 강선희, "노동판례백선" (2015), 한국노동법학회
  3. 계희열, "헌법학(중)" (2007), 박영사
  4. 2013년 전국노동조합 조직현황 보고서, "고용노동부", ~ (2014)
  5. 김동욱, "지부ㆍ분회의 조직형태변경을 통한 산별노조 탈퇴 가능여부", 노동포스트, (창간) (2015), 나라경영(주)
  6. 김성수, "산별노조의 소송상 쟁점", 노동법연구, (30), pp.99~123 (2011), 서울대학교노동법연구회
  7. 김유성, "노동법Ⅱ" (1998), 법문사
  8. 김형배, "노동법" (2014), 박영사
  9. 김희성, "일본에서의 산별노조조직 및 운영에 관한 고찰", 경영법률, 15(2), pp.419~444 (2005), 한국경영법률학회
  10. 노조 조직형태의 다양화와 노동법의 과제, "문무기", 한국노동연구원, ~ (2004)
  11. 박종희, "노동조합의 조직변경과 그 효력", 인권과 정의, (258) (1998), 대한변호사협회
  12. 박종희, "노조 조직형태변경에 관한 소고", 노동법학, (18), pp.229~258 (2004), 한국노동법학회
  13. 박진호, "노동조합 조직변경에 관한 법리 고찰 -초기업노조 산하 지부와 기업별노조간의 조직변경을 중심으로-", 노동법포럼, (8), pp.268~306 (2012), 노동법이론실무학회[DOI]
  14. "노동조합 및 노동관계조정법", 사법연수원, ~ (2008)
  15. 이광택, "산별노조 및 경영참가 관련 판례 연구", 노동교육, (31) (2001), 한국기술교육대학교 고용노동연수원
  16. 이병태, "최신 노동법" (2008), 중앙경제
  17. 이승욱, "산별노동조합의 노동법상 쟁점과 과제", 노동법연구, 12, pp.6~240 (2002), 서울대학교노동법연구회
  18. 이철수, "산별노조 지부의 조직형태변경결의", 노동법률 (2009), 중앙경제
  19. 임종률, "노동법" (2014), 박영사
  20. 정재성, "1997 노동판례비평" (1998), 민주사회를 위한 변호사 모임
  21. 하갑래, "집단적 노동관계법" (2013), 중앙경제
  22. 한수웅, "헌법학" (2012), 법문사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)