기업의 지배구조 속에서 사회적 책임 이론의 적용 - 이사·집행임원의 경영책임을 중심으로 -
A Study on the Application of Corporate Social Responsibility Theory Related on Corporate Governance
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) is a form of corporate self- regulation integrated into a business model. CSR policy functions as a self-regulatory mechanism whereby a business monitors and ensures its active compliance with the spirit of the law, ethical standards and international norms. In discussing on this CSR problems, we think over how this ideas related on CSR introduce to our enterprise system. Especially, this above problems have been discussed in the corporate governance systems. The principal example of disputing this problems is the case of A. Berle/G. Means and Merrick Dodd. At first, Berle and Means maintains Maximization of corporate value on the typical shareholder theory. But Dodd must take into the stakeholder’s value as well as shareholder’s value. Because the corporate and CEO of such corporate have social servicing responsibilities. Anyway, This controversy on the above two problems remained unsolved for a long time. And recently, many people started the reviews on the above problems owing to occurring to the cases such as Enron, Worldcom cases etc. Therefore, I will examine the problem of introducing on the CSR theory related on the corporate governance. So to speak, I will examine the considering the value of stakeholder. As the that methods. I will comparatively study on the systems of several countries. Concretely, I will study on the management responsibility and expansion of the fiduciary duty of director and executive officers, etc. As the effect, I will suggests on the method of interpretation of law and revision of the existing law.
Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) is a form of corporate self- regulation integrated into a business model. CSR policy functions as a self-regulatory mechanism whereby a business monitors and ensures its active compliance with the spirit of the law, ethical standards and international norms. In discussing on this CSR problems, we think over how this ideas related on CSR introduce to our enterprise system. Especially, this above problems have been discussed in the corporate governance systems. The principal example of disputing this problems is the case of A. Berle/G. Means and Merrick Dodd. At first, Berle and Means maintains Maximization of corporate value on the typical shareholder theory. But Dodd must take into the stakeholder’s value as well as shareholder’s value. Because the corporate and CEO of such corporate have social servicing responsibilities. Anyway, This controversy on the above two problems remained unsolved for a long time. And recently, many people started the reviews on the above problems owing to occurring to the cases such as Enron, Worldcom cases etc. Therefore, I will examine the problem of introducing on the CSR theory related on the corporate governance. So to speak, I will examine the considering the value of stakeholder. As the that methods. I will comparatively study on the systems of several countries. Concretely, I will study on the management responsibility and expansion of the fiduciary duty of director and executive officers, etc. As the effect, I will suggests on the method of interpretation of law and revision of the existing law.
참고문헌 (41)
- 회사 경영감독제도의 개선을 통한 기업하기 좋은 법적 환경 조성 방안 연구, "김순석", 법무부, ~ (2011)
- 고재종, "회사경영상 책임과 이사의 구제제도에 관한 고찰", 기업법연구, 14, pp.285~307 (2003), 한국기업법학회
- 세계 M&A시장 전망과 시사점, "박용린", 자본시장연구원, ~ (2011)
- 기업의 내부통제제도에 관한 비교법적 연구, "박정수", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2006)
- 주주자본주의에 대한 법경제학적 접근, "신석훈", 한국경제연구원, ~ (2009)
- 손영화, "사회적 기업에 대한 회사법적 검토", 상사판례연구, 25(4), pp.41~78 (2012), 한국상사판례학회
- 안택식, "기업의 사회적 책임의 실현 방향", 상사법연구, 19(1) (2000), 한국상사법학회
- 양만식, "일본의 신주예약권제도와 입법적 시사점", 기업법연구, 25(2), pp.59~97 (2011), 한국기업법학회
- 윤진수, "기업지배구조와 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)", 기업지배구조리뷰, 57 (2011), 한국기업지배구조원
- 이기수, "회사법" (2009), 박영사
- 정보통신부, "IT중소벤처기업 윤리경영 실천메뉴얼", ~ (2006)
- 적대적 M&A에 관한 해외 동향 : 일본의 최근 판례를 중심으로, "정순섭", 한국기업지배구조원, ~ (2006)
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)" (2015), 박영사
- 최기원, "상법학신론(상)" (2003), 박영사
- 최문희, "신주(예약권)의 제3자배정에 의한 경영권 방어의 적법성-일본방송사건에 비추어 본 일본판례의 분석을 중심으로", BFL(제12호), 서울대 금융법센터, ~ (2005)
- 최준선, "기업의 사회적책임론", 성균관법학, 17(3), pp.471~506 (2005), 법학연구소
- 최준선, "기업의 사회적 책임", 성균관법학 (2006), 성균관대 법학연구소
- 吉川英德, "コーポレートガバナンス・コード對應で上場企業に求められる視點", 大和總硏 (2015)
- 藤野元博, "会社はだれのものか-ステークホルダー論からの一考察-", 東亜大学紀要 (2006), 東亜大学
- 落合誠一, "敵対的買収における株主とステークホルダー利益の対立問題", 経営戦略研究, 7 (2006)
- 山內達夫, "コーポレートガバナンス・コードの基本的な考コえ方(案ポ)ーポレートガバナンス・コード原案-会社の持續的な成長と中長期的な企業價値の向上のためにー(原案)の解說", 會計情報, 463 (2015)
- 桑原和典, "の觀點からのコーポレートガバナンス", 三田商學硏究 (2005), 慶應義塾大学
- 松井秀征, "株主總会制度の基礎理論" (2010), 有斐閣
- 神谷高保, "企業法の理論(下)(江頭憲治郞先生還曆記念)" (2007), 商事法務
- 新津, "企業自體 の理論と普遍的理念としての株主權の「私益性 (1)", 法と政治, 59(4) (2009), 関西学院大学
- 龍田節, "會社法大要" (2007), 有斐閣
- 柳川範之, "法と企業行動の經濟分析" (2006), 日經新聞社
- 正井章筰, "EUにおけるコーポレートガバナンスをめぐる議論", 比較法學, 43(1) (2009), 早稻田大學比較法研究所
- 淸水眞, "新しい敵對的買收防衛-ライブドア vs. ニッポン放送·フジテレビ" (2005), 商事法務
- Alan Steinfeld, "Blackstone’s Guide to the Companies Act 2006" (2006), Oxford Univ. Press
- Alissa Mickels, "Beyond Corporate Social Responsibility : Reconciling the Ideas of a For-Benefit Corporation with Director Fiduciary Duties in the U.S. and Europe", Hastings Int’l & Comp. L. Rev, 32 (2009)
- Andrew Keray, "Tackling the Issue of the Corporate Objective : An Analysis of the United Kingdom’s ‘Enlightened Shareholder Value Approach", Sydney L. Rev, 29, pp.577~ (2007)
- Einer Elhauge, "Sacrificing Corporate Profits in the Public Interest", N.Y.U. L. Rev, 80 (2005)
- E. Steinberg, "Just Business Ethics in Action" (2000), Oxford University Press
- James D. cox, "Cox & hazen on Corporation Law" (2003), Kluwer
- Lucian Arye Bebchuk, "The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power", Harv. L. Rev, 118 (2005)
- Lucian A. Bebchuk, "Response to Increasing Shareholder Power: Repry: Letting Shareholders Set To the Rules", Harv. L. Rev, 119 (2006)
- Lynn Stout, "Bad and Not-So-Bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy", S. Cal. L. Rev., 75 (2002)
- Paul Rose, "Common Agency and the Public Corporation", Vand. L. Rev., 63 (2010)
- Stephen M. Bainbridge, "Director Primacy : The Means and Ends of Corporate Governance", New. U. L. Rev., 97, pp.547~ (2003)
- Stephen M. Bainbridge, "Response to Increase Shareholder Power : Director Primacy and Shareholder Disempowerment", Harv. L. Rev., 119, pp.1735~ (2006)