무트아 혼인과 종교사회적 배경에 관한 연구
A Study on Socio-religious background of Mut'a Marriage
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to study of the Socio-religious background of mut‘a, or temporary marriage in the Islamic society, especially among the Shi‘ites'. In books on jurisprudence the terms mut‘a, al-nikāḥ al-munqaṭi‘ (discontinued marriage), and al-nikaḥ al-mu’aqqat (temporary marriage) are all employed. The Sunni authorities agree that mut‘a was permitted by the Prophet Muhammad at certain points during his lifetime, but they maintain that in the end he prohibited it completely. In contrast the Shi‘ites maintain that the Prophet did not ban it, and they cite numerous Hadith from Sunni as well as Shi‘ite sources to prove this. One major purpose of the paper is to trace the origin of this divergence between Sunni and Shi‘ite law by going back to the sources and arguments on both sides. Proponents say that it offers women-especially those divorced or widowed-a way to obtain a temporary husband and support when they are unable to find a permanent marriage. Opponents say the practice is frequently used to legitimize prostitution or extramarital relations and is a danger to family values. They also say the practice undermines women's dignity.
Abstract
This paper aims to study of the Socio-religious background of mut‘a, or temporary marriage in the Islamic society, especially among the Shi‘ites'. In books on jurisprudence the terms mut‘a, al-nikāḥ al-munqaṭi‘ (discontinued marriage), and al-nikaḥ al-mu’aqqat (temporary marriage) are all employed. The Sunni authorities agree that mut‘a was permitted by the Prophet Muhammad at certain points during his lifetime, but they maintain that in the end he prohibited it completely. In contrast the Shi‘ites maintain that the Prophet did not ban it, and they cite numerous Hadith from Sunni as well as Shi‘ite sources to prove this. One major purpose of the paper is to trace the origin of this divergence between Sunni and Shi‘ite law by going back to the sources and arguments on both sides. Proponents say that it offers women-especially those divorced or widowed-a way to obtain a temporary husband and support when they are unable to find a permanent marriage. Opponents say the practice is frequently used to legitimize prostitution or extramarital relations and is a danger to family values. They also say the practice undermines women's dignity.
참고문헌 (12)
- 윤용수, "이슬람의 결혼관행", 16(1) (2006)
- ?Ahmad Jannat?, "al-Zaw?j al-D??im wa al-Mu?aqqat" (2000), Beirut : D?r al-H?d?
- ?Akram Hasan Yaghi, "al-Zaw?j al-d?ni fi lubn?n" (2001), Beirut : D?r al-H?d?
- Eum Ikran, "Urfi marriage, an Egyptian Version of Cohabitation?", 25(2) (2005)
- Muammad ?Ali al-ab?ab???, "al-Zaw?j al-Isl?mi" (1998), Beirut : D?r al-Auj?m
- Mun?r al-Sheikh Mahd?, "al-zaw?j al-mu?aqqat wa al-ru?ya al-mu?aira" (2000), Beirut : Mu?assasa al-bal?gh
- Richa Nagar, "Religion, Race, and the debate over Mut'a in Dar es Salaam", 26(3) (2000)
- ?li al-Ward?ni, "Zaw?j al-mut?a halal ?inda ahl al-sunna" (1997), Cairo : Maktabat Madb?l? al-aghir
- Shahla Haery, "Temporary Marriage and the State in Iran: An Islamic Discourse on Female Sexuality", 59(1) (1992)
- Tauf?q al-Fak?k?, "al-Mut?a" (1998), Beirut : D?r al-?Aw??
- 뉴욕타임즈, "Love Finds a Way in Iran: ‘Temporary Marriage'", 뉴욕타임즈
- "http:", famnews, pp.09182000.htm
