Lawrence and Joyce: Rethinking Modernism
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Lawrence and Joyce, two modernist giants, are traditionally considered opposites; or rather, those who appreciate either one’s work do not seem to share the praise for the other. From the Leavis’ early decision that Lawrence is “how radically unlikely Joyce,” this basic view has been taken for granted and thus the discussion has been avoided for generations. In the meantime, the two “parties” have each produced Lawrence- and Joyce-industries without many academic connections or exchanges. It is true that a major source of such a view is the novelists themselves. Both authors throw harsh comments to each other. And their respective admirers have more or less been confirming their views. In this paper, I will try to elucidate the reality of this chasm by examining, first, Lawrence’s and Joyce’s ideas of the novel. They both “wrecked the whole structure of the novel” by “their technical innovations” (Walter Allen), but the way they “wreck” is contrasting. I then survey the opinions of both parties who endorse the two authors’ merits respectively. To make my discussion more concrete, I examine their treatment of marriage and adultery in Lady Chatterley’s Lover and Ulysses. Though the general tendency has not been optimistic about the possible reconciliation or convergence of the two novelists and their admirers, their difference sheds a fruitful light to a fundamental question of the function or mission of the novel. If we can elucidate their achievements clearly enough, they can offer ample ground to understand the huge literary and cultural movement called Modernism.
Abstract
Lawrence and Joyce, two modernist giants, are traditionally considered opposites; or rather, those who appreciate either one’s work do not seem to share the praise for the other. From the Leavis’ early decision that Lawrence is “how radically unlikely Joyce,” this basic view has been taken for granted and thus the discussion has been avoided for generations. In the meantime, the two “parties” have each produced Lawrence- and Joyce-industries without many academic connections or exchanges. It is true that a major source of such a view is the novelists themselves. Both authors throw harsh comments to each other. And their respective admirers have more or less been confirming their views. In this paper, I will try to elucidate the reality of this chasm by examining, first, Lawrence’s and Joyce’s ideas of the novel. They both “wrecked the whole structure of the novel” by “their technical innovations” (Walter Allen), but the way they “wreck” is contrasting. I then survey the opinions of both parties who endorse the two authors’ merits respectively. To make my discussion more concrete, I examine their treatment of marriage and adultery in Lady Chatterley’s Lover and Ulysses. Though the general tendency has not been optimistic about the possible reconciliation or convergence of the two novelists and their admirers, their difference sheds a fruitful light to a fundamental question of the function or mission of the novel. If we can elucidate their achievements clearly enough, they can offer ample ground to understand the huge literary and cultural movement called Modernism.
참고문헌 (61)
- Bell, Michael, "The Cambridge Companion to D. H. Lawrence", pp.179~196 (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Bell, Michael, "Literature, Modernism and Myth: Belief and Responsibility in the Twentieth Century" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Bowen, Zack, "Modernists at Odds: Reconsidering Joyce and Lawrence", pp.11~27 (2015), University Press of Florida
- Brett, Dorothy, "Lawrence and Brett: A Friendship" (1933), Lippincott
- Budgen, Frank, "James Joyce and the Making of Ulysses" (1967), Indiana University Press
- Burden, Robert, "Radicalizing Lawrence: Critical Interventions in the Reading and Reception of D. H. Lawrence’s Narrative Fiction" (2000), Rodopi
- "James Joyce’s Ulysses"[URL]
- Burgess, Anthony, "Flame into Being: The Life and Work of D. H. Lawrence" (1985), Heinemann
- Burgess, Anthony, "Re Joyce" (1968), Norton
- Carey, John, "The Intellectuals and the Masses" (1992), Faber & Faber
- "Rereading The Sound and the Fury" (2012)[URL]
- Cowan, James, "D. H. Lawrence and the Trembling Balance" (1990), Pennsylvania State University Press
- Deakin, William, "D. H. Lawrence’s Attacks on Proust and Joyce", Essays in Criticism, 7(4), pp.383~403 (1957)
- "“A Would-Be-Dirty Mind”: D. H. Lawrence as an Enemy of Joyce"[URL]
- Deming, Robert H., "The Critical Heritage: James Joyce, Vol. 1" (1970), Routledge
- Deming, Robert H., "The Critical Heritage: James Joyce, Vol. 2" (1970), Routledge
- Derrida, Jacques, "Acts of Literature", pp.253~309 (1992), Routledge
- Durrell, Lawrence, "Clea" (1960), E. P. Dutton
- Eliot, T. S., "After Strange Gods: A Primer of Modern Heresy" (1934), Faber and Faber
- Eliot, T. S., "Selected Prose of T. S. Eliot", pp.175~178 (1975), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
- Ellmann, Richard, "James Joyce" (1983), Oxford University Press
- "Virginia Colleges Conference, tape 2" (1957)[URL]
- Ford, George H., "Double Measure: A Study of the Novels and Stories of D. H. Lawrence" (1965), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Foster, R. F., "W. B. Yeats: A Life II: The Arch-Poet, 1915–1939" (2003), Oxford University Press
- "James Joyce’s Ulysses"[URL]
- "James Joyce’s Ulysses reviewed-archive, 1922" (2022)[URL]
- Ingersoll, Earl G., "Modernists at Odds: Reconsidering Joyce and Lawrence", pp.39~60 (2015), University Press of Florida
- "An interview with Huff Post"[URL]
- Jackson, Dennis, "Lady Chatterley’s Lover: Lawrence’s Response to Ulysses?", Philological Quarterly, 66(3), pp.410~416 (1987)
- Joyce, James, "The Critical Writings of James Joyce" (1989), Cornell University Press
- Joyce, James, "Exiles" (1918), B. W. Huebsch
- Joyce, James, "Selected Letters of James Joyce" (1975), Viking
- Joyce, James, "Stephen Hero" (1960), Jonathan Cape
- Joyce, James, "Ulysses" (2011), Penguin
- Dieter Mehl, "The First and Second Lady Chatterley’s Lover" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Lawrence, D. H., "Introductions and Reviews" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Lawrence, D. H., "Lady Chatterley’s Lover" (1993), Cambridge University Press
- Lawrence, D. H., "The Letters of D. H. Lawrence, Vol. 6" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Lawrence, D. H., "Bruce Steele" (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Lawrence, T. E., "The Selected Letters" (1989), Norton
- Leavis, F. R., "D. H. Lawrence: Novelist" (1956), University of Chicago Press
- Levine, Jennifer, "The Cambridge Companion to James Joyce", pp.131~159 (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Lodge, David, "After Bakhtin: Essays on Fiction and Criticism" (1990), Routledge
- Lusty, Heather L., "Modernists at Odds: Reconsidering Joyce and Lawrence", pp.1~10 (2015), University Press of Florida
- MacCabe, Colin, "James Joyce and the Revolution of the Word" (1979), MacMillan
- Miller, Henry, "The World of Lawrence: A Passionate Appreciation" (1980), Capra Press
- Montaigne, Michel de, "The Complete Essays of Montaigne" (1966), Stanford University Press
- O’Brien, Edna, "James Joyce" (1999), Phoenix
- Orwell, George, "Inside the Whale and Other Essays" (2001), Penguin
- Powys, John Cowper, "The Pleasure of Literature" (1946), Cassell and Company
- Ruskin, John, "Modern Painters, Vol. 3" (1860), J. Wiley
- Shelley, P. B., "A Defence of Poetry" (1965), Bobbs-Merrill Company
- Spinoza, "Ethics, Part II" (1941), Dent
- S. S. B., "What Joyce Is Up Against", Little Review: A Magazine of the Arts―Making No Compromise with the Public Taste, 5(2) (1918)
- "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy"[URL]
- Toynbee, Philip, "James Joyce: Two Decades of Criticism", pp.243~284 (1948), Vanguard
- "Who the Hell Is This Joyce" (2016)[URL]
- Wilson, Edmund, "Axel’s Castle" (1979), Fontana
- Wolfe, Thomas, "Of Time and the River" (1935), Charles Scribner’s Sons
- Woolf, Virginia, "The Essays of Virginia Woolf, Vol. 4" (1984), Hogarth Press
- Yeats, W. B., "The Poems" (1994), Dent