한국어판 피임 자기효능감(K-CSE) 도구의 신뢰도와 타당도: 여대생을 중심으로
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Contraceptive Self-efficacy Scale: Focused on Women University Students
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and test the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Contraceptive Self-efficacy (K-CSE) scale. Methods: The K-CSE scale was developed through forward-backward translation methods. Construct and criterion validity and internal consistency reliability were calculated using SPSS/WIN 21.0. Data were collected from 257 women students from two universities in G city, South Korea. Results: The factor structure of the K-CSE scale showed the cumulative variance as 62.9% in the factor analysis. Factor loading of 13 items on four subscales ranged from .47 to .88. Factors were named as 'initiative of contraceptive use', 'sexual assertiveness', 'refusal of sexual intercourse', and 'autonomic sexual behavior'. Criterion validity compared to the Sexual Autonomy Measurement (SAM) showed significant correlation. Cronbach's ⍺ for the reliability of each subscale were .50~.82 and .76 for the total scale. Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate that the K-CSE scale is a satisfactory valid and reliable scale. Therefore, the CSE scale can be useful in measuring contraceptive self-efficacy among women university students in Korea.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and test the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Contraceptive Self-efficacy (K-CSE) scale. Methods: The K-CSE scale was developed through forward-backward translation methods. Construct and criterion validity and internal consistency reliability were calculated using SPSS/WIN 21.0. Data were collected from 257 women students from two universities in G city, South Korea. Results: The factor structure of the K-CSE scale showed the cumulative variance as 62.9% in the factor analysis. Factor loading of 13 items on four subscales ranged from .47 to .88. Factors were named as 'initiative of contraceptive use', 'sexual assertiveness', 'refusal of sexual intercourse', and 'autonomic sexual behavior'. Criterion validity compared to the Sexual Autonomy Measurement (SAM) showed significant correlation. Cronbach's ⍺ for the reliability of each subscale were .50~.82 and .76 for the total scale. Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate that the K-CSE scale is a satisfactory valid and reliable scale. Therefore, the CSE scale can be useful in measuring contraceptive self-efficacy among women university students in Korea.
참고문헌 (30)
- 김영희, "대학생의 성적 자기주장에 영향을 미치는 요인", 여성건강간호학회지, 19(3), pp.166~175 (2013), 여성건강간호학회
- 허명행, "대학생들의 성행동 및 피임지식과 태도와의 관계", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 37(3), pp.267~275 (2007), 한국간호과학회
- 정애화, "일부지역 대학생의 성 경험 영향요인", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 16(1), pp.555~563 (2015), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- Kim JA, "Analysis of sexual related predicting factors for female university students in Korea", The Journal of the Convertgence on Culture Technology, 1(1), pp.15~26 (2015)
- Park HM, "Abortion in Korea" (2011), Korean Institute of Criminology
- 신경림, "한국 대학생의 성행동, 생식건강 관련 건강행위, 성경험 특성 실태", 성인간호학회지, 22(6), pp.624~633 (2010), 성인간호학회
- 조윤희, "청소년의 피임 실천과 영향 요인", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 31(5), pp.59~70 (2014), 한국보건교육건강증진학회[DOI]
- 김예진, "성 경험이 있는 대학생의 태도, 주관적 규범, 지각된 행위통제 및 의도와 안전한 성행위 간의 관계", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 15(1), pp.356~366 (2014), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- Chang SB, "Development of sexual autonomy measurement for college students", Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 8(1), pp.106~115 (2002)
- Koh KS, "Mediating effects of birth control knowledge in relation to effects of high schoolers’ birth control self-efficacy on birth control attitude", master, pp.2014
- 황신우, "미혼성인의 피임행위 구조모형: 남·녀 비교", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 44(2), pp.159~169 (2014), 한국간호과학회
- Levinson RA, "Contraceptive self efficacy: A perspective on teenage girl's contraceptive behavior", The Journal of Sex Research, 22(3), pp.347~369 (1986)
- Alvarez C, "Predictors of condom use among Mexican adolescents", Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 24(3), pp.187~196 (2010)
- Kang HS, "An explanatory model of condom use among Korean college students", pp.2001
- 이인숙, "인문계와 실업계 여고생들의 피임지식과 피임 자기효능감에 관한 비교", 한국학교보건학회지, 21(2), pp.75~88 (2008), 한국학교보건학회
- Brien TM, "Dimensions of self-efficacy among three distinct groups of condom users", Journal of American College Health, 42(4), pp.167~174 (1994)
- Hale PJ, "Women’s self-efficacy and sexually transmitted disease preventive behaviors", Research in Nursing & Health, 19(2), pp.101~110 (1996)
- Levinson RA, "The impact of cultural context on Brazilian adolescents' sexual practices", Adolescence, 39(154), pp.203~227 (2004)
- Ip WY, "Contraceptive self-efficacy and contraceptive knowledge of Hong Kong Chinese women with unplanned pregnancy", Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(17), pp.2416~2425 (2009)
- Levinson RA, "The contraceptive self-efficacy scale: Analysis in four samples", Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27(6), pp.773~793 (1998)
- Munro BH, "Statistical methods for health care research", pp.1~480 (2002), Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins
- Kim HC, "Statistical analysis alone to complete from analysis to reporting", pp.1~461 (2013), Hakjisa
- "Process of translation and adaptation of instruments" (2013)[URL]
- Streiner DL, "Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use", pp.1~416 (2008), Oxford University Press
- 조규영, "여대생의 성적 자율성에 영향을 미치는 요인", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 15(11), pp.6710~6718 (2014), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- Kim MJ, "A structural equation model explaining contraception behaviors of married Korean women", Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 7(2), pp.141~156 (2001)
- Rickert VI, "Is lack of sexual assertiveness among adolescent and young adult women a cause for concern?", Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34(4), pp.178~183 (2002)
- 이지연, "여성용 성적 자기주장성 척도의 개발 및 구인 타당도 검증", 상담학연구, 7(1), pp.47~62 (2006), 한국상담학회
- Chang SB, "Women's health: Research on women's health; Sexual autonomy of married women", Journal of Nursing Query, 5(1), pp.71~89 (1996)
- Henson RK, "Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), pp.393~416 (2006)