國際統一契約規範下에서 契約解除의 效果에 관한 比較法的 考察 －CISG, PICC, PECL의 規定體系 및 判決例를 중심으로－
A Comparative Study on the Legal Effect for Termination of contract under International Contractual Rules
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
In the case of CISG, main articles for terminate of contract are 25, 49, 51, 72, 64, 79 and so forth. To sum up these article, breach of contract committed by one of the parties is fundamental if it results in such detriment to the other party as substantially to deprive him of what he is entitled to expect under the contract, unless the party in breach did not foresee and a reasonable person of the same kind in the same circumstances would not have foreseen such a result. In the other hand PICC, are 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 7.1.1, 7.1.3, 7.3.1, 7.3.3 an so on. Not only there is hardship where the occurrence of events fundamentally alters the equilibrium of the contract either because the cost of a party's performance has increased or because the value of the performance a party receives has diminished but in the case of hardship the disadvantaged party is entitled to request renegotiations. the request shall be made without undue delay and shall indicate the grounds on which it is based. Finally PECL are regulatory articles are 6:111, 8:103, 8:106, 9:301. to summarize of these article, a non-performance of an obligation is fundamental to the contract if strict compliance with the obligation is of the essence of the contract or the non-performance substantially deprives the aggrieved party of what it was entitled to expect under the contract, unless the other party did not foresee and could not reasonably have foreseen that result or the non-performance is intentional and gives the aggrieved party reason to believe that it cannot rely on the other party's future performance.
참고문헌 (27)
- 강병창, "국제통일매매법" (2000), 형설출판사
- 박영복, "계약체결전단계의 법규범화", 10 (2001), 한국외국어대학교
- 박정기, "유니드로와(UNIDROIT) 국제상사계약원칙에 있어서 계약책임", 11(2) (1999), 한국상사법학회
- 송양호, "유럽계약법원칙과 한국법", 21(2) (2002), 한국상사법학회
- 심종석, "국제계약규범하에서 사정변경원칙의 적용기준과 법규제에 관한 비교 연구", 20(2) (2005), 한국국제상학회
- "국제상사계약에 있어 신의칙의 적용기준과 법규제에 관한 비교 연구", (56) (2004), 법무부
- "유럽契約法原則下에서 不履行과 法的 救濟에 관한 比較法的 考察", (62) (2005), 법무부
- 양영환, "국제무역법규" (1998), 삼영사
- 오원석 역, "UN 통일매매법" (2004), 삼영사
- 허해관, "國際物品賣買契約上의 免責規則에 관한 一考察", 통상법률, (61), pp.56~92 (2005), 법무부
- Bonell, M. J, "The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts and the Principles of European Contract Law Similar Rules for the Same Purposes?" (1996)
- Eiselen, S, "Comparison with Principles of European Contract Law Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law" (2002)
- Farnsworth, E. A.,, "Farnsworth on Contracts" (1998)
- Honnold, J. O, "Uniform Law for the International Sales under the 1980 United Nations Convention" (1999), Kluwer Law Int'l
- Hossam El-Saghir, "Comparison with Principles of European Contract Law" (2002)
- Kritzer, A. H., "Guide to Practical Applications of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods" (1989), Kluwer Law Int'l,
- Lando, O, "The Principles of European Contract Law Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law" (2002)
- Beale, H.,, "The principles of European Contract Law : Part Ⅰ. : Performance, Non-performance and Remedies" (1995), Kluwer Law International
- Riedl, R, "The Work of the Lando-Commission from an Alternative Viewpoint" (2000), Kluwer Law International
- Schlechtriem, P.,, "Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods" (1998), Oxford Press
- "UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES of International Commercial Contracts" (2004), UNIDROIT
- "Oberlandesgericht Hamburg’, 「1 U 167", 95」,, 1997, ~
- "Schweizerisches Bundesgericht’, 「4C.105", 2000, 2000, ~
- "U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, East. Div", pp.03~ (2004)
- "www.lexmercatoria.org"
- "www.unidroit.org", english, main.htm
- "www.unilex.info"