정기용선계약에 있어서의 운송인 특정 문제

참고문헌 (19)

1. 김인현, "해상법연구" (2002), 삼우사
2. 박용섭, "해상법론" (1998), 형설출판사
3. 이승호, "정기용선계약에 관한 연구", D, pp.2005
4. 이창희, "정기용선계약법의 개정 방향에 관한 연구", D, pp.2003
5. 정찬형, "상법강의 (하), 제8판" (2006), 박영사
6. Nicholas J. Healy, "Cases and Materials on Admiralty, 3rd ed." (1999)
7. Nicholas J. Healy, "David B. Sharpe Cases and Materials on Admiralty, 3rd ed." (2002), Statutory and Documentary Supplement
8. In Hyeon Kim, "Korean Maritime Law Update", J. Mar. L. & Com, (36), pp.363~ (2005)
9. Jo Desha Lucas, "Admiralty, 5th ed" (2003), Cases and Materials
10. Frank L. Marais, "Admiralty in a Nutshell, 5th ed." (2005)
11. Tony Nunes, "Charterer's Liability under the Ship Time Charter", Hous. J. Int'l L., (26), pp.561~ (2004)
12. Caslav Pejovic, "The Identity of Carrier: Problem under Time Charters: Diversity Despite Unification of Law", Mar. L. & Com., (379) (2000)
13. Mary T. Reilly,, "Identity of the Carrier Issues under Slot Charters", Tul. Mar. L.J, (25), pp.505~ (2001)
14. Thomas J. Schoenbaum, "Admiralty and Maritime Law, 4th ed." (2004)
15. Joseph C. Sweeney, "Crossing The Himalayas: Exculpatory Clauses In Global Transport. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd", J. Mar. L. & Com., (36), pp.155~ (2005)
16. William Tetley, "Bills Of Lading: Where Both Sides Of The Bill Of Lading Differ, The Charterer, Not The Shipowner, Is The Carrier, The Shipowner May Not Benefit From A Himalaya Clause, Aand Only A Claimant With Title At The Time May Sue The Shipowner In Tort. Homburg Houtimport B.V. v. Agrosin Private Ltd. (The Starsin),", J. Mar. L. & Com., (35), pp.121~ (2004)
17. William Tetley, "Reform Of Carriage Of Goods--The Uncitral Draft And Senate Enate COGSA '99", Tul. Mar. L.J., (28), pp.1~ (2003)
18. William Tetley, "Marine Cargo Claims, ch. 10: Whom to Sue (4th ed.)" (2008)
19. Hideo Yoshimoto, "The Time Charter in Japan: A Comparision", Transnat'l Law, (1), pp.449~ (1988)

관련 논문AI추천