본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일제강점기 대종교인 成世英의 백두산 여행과 영토의식 - 「遊白頭山紀行錄」을 중심으로 -

A Daejonggyonite Sung Se-young’s Trip to Baekdusan(白頭山) Mt., and his Conception about National Territory

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This article reviews 「Yubaekdusangihaengrok(遊白頭山紀行錄)」 written by a Daejonggyonite Seong Se-young(成世英(1885~1953)), and reviews his conception about Baekdusan(白頭山) and national territory. The time between late 19th and 20th century is one of the most turbulent times in Korean history. Loss of nation awakened national awareness, and on the basis of this awareness, intelligentsia of the era ‘rediscovered’ uniqueness of the Korean culture and history, and made them into the symbols that formed national identity. One of those symbols were the Baekdusan(白頭山). From then on, meaning of the Baekdusan(白頭山) changed from the mere origin of Korean land, into the origin of Korean people, the place Dangun(檀君) found a country. With this new concept of Dangun(檀君)’s foundation, the symbol of Baekdusan(白頭山) was reformed in the context of modern nationalism. The journal, 「Yubaekdusangihaengrok(遊白頭山紀行錄)」 is the record written by Sung Se-young(成世英), during his 14 day trip to Baekdusan, from June 22nd of 1922 to July 3rd. This journal contains its writter’s concepts about Korean people, Baekdusan(白頭山) and Gando(間島). As a Daejonggyonite, he recorded natural environment and geographical characteristics of Baekdusan(白頭山), and what he saw and heard about the mountain, through nationalistic point of view. He recognized the Baekdusan(白頭山) as the origin of Korean people and culture, where the prime ancestor Dangun(檀君) found the country. Therefore in his point of view, Gando(間島) should be part of Korean territory, since the region is near the Baekdusan(白頭山). He also claimed that, with historical appropriateness, Gando(間島) is part of Korean territory, but lost by Japanese imperialists. In conclusion, the journal 「Yubaekdusangihaengrok(遊白頭山紀行錄)」 lets us review concepts of nationalism and territory the intelligentsia of late 19th century.

Abstract

This article reviews 「Yubaekdusangihaengrok(遊白頭山紀行錄)」 written by a Daejonggyonite Seong Se-young(成世英(1885~1953)), and reviews his conception about Baekdusan(白頭山) and national territory. The time between late 19th and 20th century is one of the most turbulent times in Korean history. Loss of nation awakened national awareness, and on the basis of this awareness, intelligentsia of the era ‘rediscovered’ uniqueness of the Korean culture and history, and made them into the symbols that formed national identity. One of those symbols were the Baekdusan(白頭山). From then on, meaning of the Baekdusan(白頭山) changed from the mere origin of Korean land, into the origin of Korean people, the place Dangun(檀君) found a country. With this new concept of Dangun(檀君)’s foundation, the symbol of Baekdusan(白頭山) was reformed in the context of modern nationalism. The journal, 「Yubaekdusangihaengrok(遊白頭山紀行錄)」 is the record written by Sung Se-young(成世英), during his 14 day trip to Baekdusan, from June 22nd of 1922 to July 3rd. This journal contains its writter’s concepts about Korean people, Baekdusan(白頭山) and Gando(間島). As a Daejonggyonite, he recorded natural environment and geographical characteristics of Baekdusan(白頭山), and what he saw and heard about the mountain, through nationalistic point of view. He recognized the Baekdusan(白頭山) as the origin of Korean people and culture, where the prime ancestor Dangun(檀君) found the country. Therefore in his point of view, Gando(間島) should be part of Korean territory, since the region is near the Baekdusan(白頭山). He also claimed that, with historical appropriateness, Gando(間島) is part of Korean territory, but lost by Japanese imperialists. In conclusion, the journal 「Yubaekdusangihaengrok(遊白頭山紀行錄)」 lets us review concepts of nationalism and territory the intelligentsia of late 19th century.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. "매일신보", ~
  2. 洪良浩, "耳溪集"
  3. 成海應, "硏經齋全集"
  4. 朴榮喆, "白頭山遊覽錄" (1921)
  5. 朴榮喆, "亞洲紀行" (1921), 장학사
  6. 成世英, "裸翁文集" (1981)
  7. 김성준, "歷史와 回顧" (1997), 국학자료원
  8. 김지남, "조선시대 선비들의 백두산 답사기" (1998), 혜안
  9. 김정배, "백두산" (2010), 한국학중앙연구원 출판부
  10. 안재홍, "백두산등척기" (2010), 해냄
  11. 이왕무, "譯註 勘界使謄錄" (2008), 동북아역사재단
  12. 이왕무, "譯註 勘界使謄錄下" (2010), 동북아역사재단
  13. 박은식, "우리역사 우리영웅" (2008), 한뿌리
  14. 최학주, "나의 할아버지 육당 최남선" (2011), 나남
  15. 韓永愚, "韓國民族主義歷史學" (1994), 일조각
  16. 허태용, "조선후기 중화론과 역사인식" (2009), 아카넷
  17. 대종교종경종사편수위원회, "大倧敎重光六十年史" (1971), 대종교총본사
  18. "馬島日記" (2006), 독립기념관 한국독립운동사연구소
  19. 강석화, "조선 후기 백두산에 대한 인식의 변화", 조선시대사학보, (56), pp.195~224 (2011), 조선시대사학회
  20. 강순돌, "『백두산행기』에 나타난 윤화수의 장소인식과 지리지식의 유형", 한국지역지리학회지, 15(1), pp.99~114 (2009), 한국지역지리학회
  21. 김동환, "성세영 본사행일기와 관련한 1920년대 대종교의 국내활동", 국학연구, 12 (2008)
  22. 김성환, "대종교계 사서의 역사관", 한민족연구, 2 (2006)
  23. 金龍國, "白頭山考", 白山學報, 8 (1970)
  24. 盧鏞弼, "대한제국기 自新會 관련 고문서에 대한 검토", 한국근현대사연구, 5 (1996)
  25. 박민영, "張志淵의 北方疆域 認識 -大韓疆域考의 白頭山定界碑考를 중심으로-", 한국독립운동사연구, (25), pp.1~30 (2005), 한국독립운동사연구소
  26. 朴烜, "羅喆의 人物과 活動-大倧敎 創始 이전을 중심으로-, In 滿洲韓人民族運動史硏究" (1991), 일조각
  27. 서동일, "1919년 파리장서운동의 전개와 역사적 성격", 박사, pp.2009
  28. 손혜리, "조선 후기 문인들의 백두산 유람과 기록에 대하여", 민족문학사연구, (37), pp.139~172 (2008), 민족문학사학회
  29. 愼鏞廈, "解題 韓末 「自新會」의 「趣旨書」 「同盟書」 등", 韓國學報, 13 (1978)
  30. 정숭교, "한말 민권론의 전개와 국수론의 대두", 박사, pp.2004
  31. 정욱재, "일제강점기 조선인 관료의 백두산 여행과 간도 인식―󰡔백두산유람록󰡕을 중심으로", 藏書閣, (24), pp.169~192 (2010), 한국학중앙연구원
  32. 황영례, "성세영(成世英)의 본사행일기에 나타나는 인물 분석", 국학연구, 12 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)