자본조달과 신주인수권
The Preemptive Right To New Shares and Capital Procurement
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
【Abstract】 The Preemptive Right To New Shares and Capital Procurement Chung, Joo-Hwan The purpose of this paper is to investigate an elimination of the preemptive right to new shares. The preemptive right means, first of all, the right to purchase shares to be issued after the incorporation of the stock company. This right has considerable value to the stockholder, if shareholders themselves are in a position to purchase additional share, because the stock is usually offered to them below the market price, and because they are privileged to sell their right outsiders. In view of factors as the above said, preemptive right are property. Shareholders who are entitled to preemptive rights are notified of such right and are given a certain time in which to make use of them. Failure to act is considered to be waiver of the right. Preemptive rights usually belong only to holders of voting stock. It is needless to say the preemptive right of the shareholders play an important role to protest the right of shareholders to corporate assets and also to maintain the existing portion of share ownership. The Korean Commercial Code Article 418(Contents of Preemptive Right, Designation and Public Notice of Record Date for Allotment) provides that (1) Each shareholder shall be entitled to the allotment of new shares in proportion to the number of shares which he hold.<Amended by Act No. 6488, Jul. 24, 2001> (2) The company may make an allotment of new shares to other persons than the shareholders under the provisions of articles of incorporation, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph: Provided, That in such case, it shall be limited to the case necessary for the achievement of the company's operational, such as an introduction of new technology, improvement of financial structures, etc.<Newly Inserted by Act No. 6488, Jul. 24, 2001> The second subsection would be inconsistent with the spirit of the first subsection. I doubt a lack of the cooling off period in The Korean Commercial Law legislation.
참고문헌 (22)
- 김영곤, "신주인수권의 법리", 법학연구, 22
- 박철영, "상법상 주식제도의 문제점과 과제", 기업법연구, 19(3)통권 : 22 (2006)
- 原田炅治, "平成13年改正商法の解說", 商事法務, (1642) (2002)
- 永田伯治, "種類株式の自由化と關聯する制度改正(上)", 商事法務, (1630) (2002)
- 富山康吉, "新株引受權", 株式會社法講義4卷
- 西原 一, "改正株式會社法の問題點"
- 豊崎, "株式會社におる多數決の濫用", 法學協會, 58(3)
- 阪梵光男, "新株引受權の法理" (1970)
- 富山康吉, "アナりカ會社法にる新株引受權の原則", 民商法雜誌, 24(5)
- 民商法雜誌, "Das Bezugrsrecht und sein Einflub auf die Kursentwicklung," (1966)
- Baumbach-hueck, "Aktiengetz, 13. Aufl."
- H. Bernicken, "Das Bezugsrecht des aktionars in rechtlicher und banktechnischer Hinsicht" (1928)
- H. Filbinger, "Die Schranken der Mehrheitscherrschaftn im Aktienrecht und Konzernrecht," (1942)
- J.V. Gierke, "hanelssrecht und Schiffahrtsrecht, 8. Aufl." (1957)
- D.Guntz, "Fragen aus Aktien-Bezugsrecht," (1957)
- F.Guldenstein, "Das Aktienbezugsrecht, Diss, Muchuen" (1914)
- Horrwitz, "Schutz und Vorratsaktien mit Einem Anhang und dem Beschluβ der Zulassungsstelle" (1925)
- Mestmäker, "Verwaltung, Konzerngewalt und Rechte der Aktionἅre" (1958)
- H. Rasch, "Deutsches Konzernrecht, 3.Aufl.," (1966)
- H.W.Ballantine, "Private Corporation," (1927)
- Dodd, "The First Half Century of Statuory Regulation of Business Corporation in Massachusetts, Harvard Legal Essays" (1934)
- G.D.Hornstein, "Corporation Law and Praction," (1959)
