본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

부동산중개계약의 성립에 관한 고찰

Study in Establishing Real Estate Brokerage Contract

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This paper aims to provide the problems regarding the validity of establishing real estate brokerage contracts (hereafter REBC) and then to solve the legal complications on these. The first issue is regarding when exactly the brokerage contracts go into effect, and the second one is the validity of tacit agreements. In order to solve these two problems, the author examined first it was examined first that whether the REBC has any difference from delegation contracts, employment contracts or other subcontracts. There are many kinds of brokerage such as unilateral, bilateral, medium-used, instructed, multiple listing brokerages, etc. This paper explores not only each content of these brokerages but also various kinds of brokerage contracts such as Open Listing Contract, Exclusive Agency Listing Contract, Exclusive Right-to-Sell Listing Contract, Net Listing Contract. No conflict can be caused regarding the validity of establishing real estate brokerage contracts if an explicit BC brokerage contracts (hereafter BC) is made. However, in real brokering situation most realtors are asked brokerings verbally, thus problems occur quite often. It is the author’s intention to make it clear when exactly BC gets into effect in that case through concrete precedents leading cases. The problems regarding the validity of tacit agreements can occur from the relations between the realtors who are asked brokering from clients and the other party who are not asked during the performance of brokering. In this case what qualification would be necessary to complete REBC with the other party who are not asked to broker? This paper tried to recognize attempted to make it clear citing the specific judicial precedents. However, it was hardly for us to find any leading case related to these two problems in the real brokering situations even though these are the matters that can occur quite often in Korea. It is not certain whether it might be lack of realtors’ aggressive legal action against these problems or not. Furthermore, there are few studies on these matters yet. Therefore, the author tried to find our own solutions after researching how these matters are settled in Japan and Germany.

Abstract

This paper aims to provide the problems regarding the validity of establishing real estate brokerage contracts (hereafter REBC) and then to solve the legal complications on these. The first issue is regarding when exactly the brokerage contracts go into effect, and the second one is the validity of tacit agreements. In order to solve these two problems, the author examined first it was examined first that whether the REBC has any difference from delegation contracts, employment contracts or other subcontracts. There are many kinds of brokerage such as unilateral, bilateral, medium-used, instructed, multiple listing brokerages, etc. This paper explores not only each content of these brokerages but also various kinds of brokerage contracts such as Open Listing Contract, Exclusive Agency Listing Contract, Exclusive Right-to-Sell Listing Contract, Net Listing Contract. No conflict can be caused regarding the validity of establishing real estate brokerage contracts if an explicit BC brokerage contracts (hereafter BC) is made. However, in real brokering situation most realtors are asked brokerings verbally, thus problems occur quite often. It is the author’s intention to make it clear when exactly BC gets into effect in that case through concrete precedents leading cases. The problems regarding the validity of tacit agreements can occur from the relations between the realtors who are asked brokering from clients and the other party who are not asked during the performance of brokering. In this case what qualification would be necessary to complete REBC with the other party who are not asked to broker? This paper tried to recognize attempted to make it clear citing the specific judicial precedents. However, it was hardly for us to find any leading case related to these two problems in the real brokering situations even though these are the matters that can occur quite often in Korea. It is not certain whether it might be lack of realtors’ aggressive legal action against these problems or not. Furthermore, there are few studies on these matters yet. Therefore, the author tried to find our own solutions after researching how these matters are settled in Japan and Germany.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 곽윤직, "채권각론(민법강의Ⅳ)" (1992), 박영사
  2. 이재웅, "전속중개계약의 법률관계에 대하여", 학술지, (3) (2007), 서울사이버대학교 부동산학과
  3. 이재웅, "부동산거래에 있어 쌍방적 중개의 가부에 대하여", 대한부동산학회지, (13) (1995)
  4. 이병우, "민법상 전형계약으로서의 중개계약과 중개인의 책임", 법학연구, 42(1), 부산대학교
  5. 김기수, "부동산중개계약의 정형화론 -부동산중개업법의 보완을 위하여-", 부동산법학 (Ⅰ) (1987), 한국부동산법학회
  6. 明石三郞, "不動産仲介契約の硏究(再增補)" (1987), 一粒社
  7. 明石三郞, "不動産仲介契約論" (1994), 信山社
  8. 來栖三郞, "契約法(契約學全集21)" (1974), 有斐閣
  9. 商行爲法, "西原寬一", 有斐閣, ~ (1960)
  10. 坪田潤二郞, "判例不動産取引法" (1964), 酒井書店
  11. 加藤一郞, "不動産媒介業者の責任と範圍" (1965), 住宅新報社
  12. 川村俊雄, "不動産仲介契約 in: 現代契約法體系 第三卷" (1983), 有斐閣
  13. 海老塚和衛, "宅地建物取引業者と依賴者との間の不動産仲介をめぐる法律關係について" (1962), 判例タイムズ社
  14. 島田禮介, "不動産取引業者の報酬請求權をめぐつて in: 現代實務法の課題(木村保男編)" (1974), ? 有信堂
  15. 甲斐好文, "不動産仲介契約における報酬請求權", 九州大學法學, (65)
  16. 明石三郞, "判例批評", 判例時報, (721)
  17. 鈴木重信, "“判例批評”, 「最高裁判所判例解說民事編1968년51사건」", ~
  18. 中川高男, "判例批評", 民商法雜誌, 60(1)
  19. 山崎悠基, "判例批評", ジュリスト, (520)
  20. Peter Schwerdtner, "Maklerrecht" (1987), Munchen
  21. Palandt-Heinrichs, "Burgerliches Gesetzbuch" (1972), Munchen
  22. Klaus Fuchs, "Das Recht des Zivilmakers und seine Fortbildung in der hochstrichterlichen Rechtsprechung" (1975), Munchen
  23. Palandt-Thomas, "Burgerliches Gesetzbuch" (1972), Munchen
  24. Glaser-warncke, "『Das Maklerrecht in der Praxis』, 7. Aufl., Berlin, 1982", ~ (1982)
  25. Gerhard Mittelstadt, "Der Maklervertrag(insbesondere der Grund- stucksmaklervertrag) unter besonderer Berucksichtigung der Rechtsprechung des Reichasgerichts und der Ober Landes- gerichte" (1932), Kiel
  26. Dieter Reuter, "『Staudinger Kommentar zum BGB』, 11. Aufl., Berlin, 1958", ~ (1958)
  27. Palandt-Thomas, "Burgerliches Gesetzbuch" (1972), Munchen
  28. Dieter Reutur, "『Staudingers Kommentar zum BGB』, 12. Aufl., Berlin, 1988", ~ (1988)
  29. Dieter Medicus, "『Schuldrecht Ⅱ』, Besonderer Teil, 4. Aufl., Munchen, 1990", ~ (1990)
  30. "Robert Dyckerhof und Jurgen George Brandt, 『Das Recht des Immoblienmaklers』, 9. Aufl., Munchen, 1986?", ~ (1986)
  31. Mormann, "Die Rechtsprechung des BGH zum Maklerrecht des BGB", WM1971
  32. Schmidt-Salzer, "Der Vertragsabschluß im Maklerrecht" (1969), MDR
  33. Rolf Knieper, "「Der Maklervertrag im System des BGB」, NJW1970, 1293", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)