본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

부당공동행위의 적발유인제도 ― 자진신고자 감면제도를 중심으로 ―

A Study on the Incentives for Cartel Informants - Focused on the Leniency Program -

0

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Hardcore cartels including price fixing, output restriction and bid- rigging are widely considered the most anticompetitive violations. It is, however, difficult to detect covert cartels due to asymmetry of information between competition authorities and cartel participants. Accordingly, to offer cartel informants incentives is helpful for resolving asymmetry of information. It's the aim of the leniency program and the rewards program for cartel informants. In particular, many countries including US and EU have improved the leniency programs recently, which have been remarkably activated. The greatest virtue of the leniency program is to prevent cartels structurally by creating distrust among cartel members. In that regard, this paper surveys and evaluates the current Korean leniency program along with those of other key jurisdictions, and proposes some improvements. Among them, it suggests that we provide leniency only to the first appli- cant, introduce the individual leniency and the anonymous hypothetical application, and enhance the confidentiality policy. Especially for the confidentiality, we need to review EU law and discussions.

Abstract

Hardcore cartels including price fixing, output restriction and bid- rigging are widely considered the most anticompetitive violations. It is, however, difficult to detect covert cartels due to asymmetry of information between competition authorities and cartel participants. Accordingly, to offer cartel informants incentives is helpful for resolving asymmetry of information. It's the aim of the leniency program and the rewards program for cartel informants. In particular, many countries including US and EU have improved the leniency programs recently, which have been remarkably activated. The greatest virtue of the leniency program is to prevent cartels structurally by creating distrust among cartel members. In that regard, this paper surveys and evaluates the current Korean leniency program along with those of other key jurisdictions, and proposes some improvements. Among them, it suggests that we provide leniency only to the first appli- cant, introduce the individual leniency and the anonymous hypothetical application, and enhance the confidentiality policy. Especially for the confidentiality, we need to review EU law and discussions.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 송정원, "(해설)카르텔 및 불공정거래행위 규제" (2005), 박영사
  2. 오행록, "Leniency 제도 집행성과와 향후 과제", 경쟁법연구, 16 (2007)
  3. 이세인, "국제상거래에 있어서의 경쟁법에 관한 연구-미국의 경쟁법을 중심으로-", 통상법률, (80), pp.101~129 (2008), 법무부
  4. 임영철, "공정거래법-해설과 논점-" (2007), 법문사
  5. 정중원, "카르텔 감면제도의 개선과 운용 활성화", 경쟁법연구, 12 (2005)
  6. 황태희, "현행 카르텔 자진신고자 감면제도의 문제점과 개선방안", 경쟁법연구, 16 (2007)
  7. Barlingen, B. V, "The European Commission's 2002 Leniency Notice in Practice", EC Competition Policy Newsletter, 3, pp.6~ (2005)
  8. Commission Memorandum, "Competition:Commission Proposes Changes to the Leniency Notice", ~ (2006)
  9. Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules and Commission Staff Working Paper, "European Commission Green Paper", Annex to the Green Paper COM, ~ (2005)
  10. Faull, Jonathan, "The EC Law of Competition, 2nd ed" (2007), Oxford University Press
  11. Flether,Daniel J, "The Lure of Leniency:Maximizing Cartel Deterrence in Light of La Roche v. Empagran and the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and Reform Act of 2004", Transnat'l L. & Contemp. Probs, 15, pp.341~ (2005)
  12. Gavil, Andrew I, "Antitrust Law in Perspective:Cases, Concepts and Problems in Competition Policy" (2002), West Group
  13. Hammond, Scott D, "An Update of the Antitrust Division's Criminal Enforcement Program, Presented at the ABA Section of Antitrust Law Cartel Enforcement Roundtable", 2005 Fall Forum (2005)
  14. Kovacic,William E, "Private Monitoring and Antitrust Enforcement: Paying Informants to Reveal Cartels", George Washington Law Review, 69, pp.766~ (2001)
  15. Leslie, Christopher R, "Antitrust Amnesty, Game Theory and Cartel Stability", Iowa J. Corp. L, 31, pp.453~ (2006)
  16. OECD, "Fighting Hard-Core Cartels: Harm", Effective Sanctions and Leniency Programmes, ~ (2002)
  17. Sandhu,Jatinder S, "The European Commission's Leniency Policy:A Success", European Competition Law Review, 28, pp.148~ (2007)
  18. Spratling,Gary R, "Detection and Deterrence:Rewarding Informants for Reporting Violations", Geo. Wash. L. Rev, 69, pp.798~ (2001)
  19. Spratling, Gary R, "The Race for Amnesty on International Antitrust - If You Don't Come in First, the Rewards for Second Place Are No Small Consolation", Int'l Enforcement L.Rep, 16, pp.710~ (2000)
  20. US Department of Justice, "Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Antitrust Division's Leniency Program and Model Leniency Letters", ~ (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)