“And further doth declare, who was Aucthour”: The Collaborative Environment of Early Modern Authorship
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Literary collaboration has been a focus of recent studies of early modern literature. The outpouring of scholarship on the making of early modern writing and its social and material conditions, in particular, has resulted in rethinking the relation between writers and their writings. Such a critical turn to the material forms on which the meaning of a text depends and to the social networks of composition, publication, and distribution of literary artifacts serves as a call for a more nuanced approach to early modern authorship. With an awareness of this growing revisionary attention to the cultural contexts of early modern literary creativity, this paper considers authoring in the wider social and literary environments that shape the meanings and functions of writing and writer. Discussing the multi-handed textual production of the 1575 Kenilworth entertainments, which evolved from a series of dramatic performances to an anonymous printed text, The Princely Pleasures (1576), this paper brings into focus the making of writing as a collaborative venture which complicates the notions and functions of authorship.
Abstract
Literary collaboration has been a focus of recent studies of early modern literature. The outpouring of scholarship on the making of early modern writing and its social and material conditions, in particular, has resulted in rethinking the relation between writers and their writings. Such a critical turn to the material forms on which the meaning of a text depends and to the social networks of composition, publication, and distribution of literary artifacts serves as a call for a more nuanced approach to early modern authorship. With an awareness of this growing revisionary attention to the cultural contexts of early modern literary creativity, this paper considers authoring in the wider social and literary environments that shape the meanings and functions of writing and writer. Discussing the multi-handed textual production of the 1575 Kenilworth entertainments, which evolved from a series of dramatic performances to an anonymous printed text, The Princely Pleasures (1576), this paper brings into focus the making of writing as a collaborative venture which complicates the notions and functions of authorship.
참고문헌 (33)
- Adams, Simon, "Leicester and the Court: Essays on Elizabethan Politics" (2002), Manchester UP
- Ashbee, Andrew, "Oxford Dictionary of National Biography" (2004), Oxford UP
- Austen, Gillian, "George Gascoigne" (2008), D. S. Brewer
- Axton, Marie, "The Queen’s Two Bodies: Drama and the Elizabethan Succession" (1977), Royal Historical Society
- Bates, Catherine, "The Rhetoric of Courtship in Elizabethan Language and Literature" (1992), Cambridge UP
- Blayney, Peter, "A New History of Early English Drama", pp.383~422 (1997), Columbia UP
- Brooks, Douglas A., "The Book of the Play: Playwrights, Stationers, and Readers in Early Modern England", pp.203~228 (2006), U of Massachusetts P
- Clegg, Cyndia Susan, "Press Censorship in Elizabethan England" (1997), Cambridge UP
- Dillon, Janette, "The Oxford Handbook of Tudor Literature 1485-1603", pp.623~636 (2009), Oxford UP
- Frye. Susan, "Elizabeth I: The Competition for Representation" (1993), Oxford UP
- Gascoigne, George, "The Complete Works of George Gascoigne" (1910), Cambridge UP
- Goldring, Elizabeth, "‘A mercer ye wot az we be’: The Authorship of the Kenilworth Letter Reconsidered", ELR, 38(2), pp.245~269 (2008)
- Goldring, Elizabeth, "John Nichols’s The Progresses and Public Processions of Queen Elizabeth I: A New Edition of the Early Modern Sources. Vol. II", pp.231~332 (2014), Oxford UP
- Goldring, Elizabeth, "Gascoigne and Kenilworth: The Production, Reception, and Afterlife of The Princely Pleasures", ELR, 44(3), pp.363~387 (2014)
- Hackett, Helen, "Maiden Queen: Elizabeth I and the Cult of the Virgin Mary" (1995), St. Martin’s P
- Healy, Margaret, "Renaissance Transformations: The Making of English Writing 1500-1650", pp.1~11 (2009), Edinburgh UP
- Heaton, Gabriel, "Writing and Reading Royal Entertainments: From George Gascoigne to Ben Jonson" (2010), Oxford UP
- Hirschfeld, Heather, "The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Theatre", pp.441~455 (2009), Oxford UP
- Ioppolo, Grace, "Dramatists and their Manuscripts in the Age of Shakespeare, Jonson, Middleton, and Heywood: Authorship, Authority and the Playhouse" (2006), Routledge
- Masten, Jeffrey, "Textual Intercourse: Collaboration, Authorship, and Sexualities in Renaissance Drama" (1997), Cambridge UP
- Masten, Jeffrey, "A New History of Early English Drama", pp.357~382 (1997), Columbia UP
- Marotti, Arthur, "Manuscript, Print, and the English Renaissance Lyric" (1995), Cornell UP
- McGann, Jerome J., "The Textual Condition" (1991), Princeton UP
- Melinikoff, Kirk, "Oxford Dictionary of National Biography" (2004), Oxford UP
- O’Callaghan, Michelle, "Renaissance Transformations: The Making of English Writing", pp.97~111 (2009), Edinburgh UP
- Orgel, Stephen, "The Jonsonian Masque" (1965), Harvard UP
- Shapiro, Michael, "The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Theatre", pp.120~135 (2009), Oxford UP
- Sherlock, Peter, "Oxford Dictionary of National Biography" (2004), Oxford UP
- Skura, Meredith Anne, "Tudor Autobiography: Listening for Inwardness" (2008), U of Chicago P
- Stewart, Alan, "Renaissance Transformations: The Making of English Writing, 1500-1650", pp.81~96 (2009), Edinburgh UP
- Vickers, Brian, "Shakespeare, Co-Author: A Historical Study of Five Collaborative Plays" (2004), Oxford UP
- Wall, Wendy, "Early Modern English Drama: A Critical Companion", pp.1~11 (2006), Oxford UP
- Wall, Wendy, "The Imprint of Gender: Authorship and Publication in the English Renaissance" (1993), Cornell UP