본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Elizabethan Concept of Children in Shakespeare’s Plays

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This paper begins with the assumption that children are described in various works of the Shakespeare canon as “miniature adults,” in which they possess upon birth all the attributes which would be potentially manifested in their adulthood. Roles given to children lend themselves to this interpretation, and many line references to children further substantiate such a view, as Antonio in Much Ado About Nothing says, “[T]herein do men from children nothing differ.” This is an approach to Shakespeare based on the premise that blood was a chief reason since high aristocratic blood which endowed its possessor with many unlabored advantages was supposed to invest its container with an air of distinction that would manifest itself even in unlikely circumstances. So, Shakespeare's concern of the Elizabethan concept of children comes from the notion of order which was a very significant part of Elizabethan thought. For example, in The Merry Wives of Windsor, William Page pictures the Elizabethan idea of children as expressed by Shakespeare. The son of a gentleman, William is able to answer those questions which the servant, Quick, does not even understand. William is bewildered, yet very articulate and clever in his replies. Arthur in King John is another case of the Elizabethan idea of children, showing natural intellectuality or intuitive knowledge upon birth, which can not be explained by the Elizabethan aristocratic education. Arthur is represented as reflecting his gentle birthright, as much as Joan of Arc in Henry IV, Part 1 reflects her base heritage. This paper also deals with Lucius in Titus Andronicus, Clarence’s children of Richard III, the Macduff child in Macbeth, young Marcius in Coriolanus, and Mamillius in The Winter’s Tale.

Abstract

This paper begins with the assumption that children are described in various works of the Shakespeare canon as “miniature adults,” in which they possess upon birth all the attributes which would be potentially manifested in their adulthood. Roles given to children lend themselves to this interpretation, and many line references to children further substantiate such a view, as Antonio in Much Ado About Nothing says, “[T]herein do men from children nothing differ.” This is an approach to Shakespeare based on the premise that blood was a chief reason since high aristocratic blood which endowed its possessor with many unlabored advantages was supposed to invest its container with an air of distinction that would manifest itself even in unlikely circumstances. So, Shakespeare's concern of the Elizabethan concept of children comes from the notion of order which was a very significant part of Elizabethan thought. For example, in The Merry Wives of Windsor, William Page pictures the Elizabethan idea of children as expressed by Shakespeare. The son of a gentleman, William is able to answer those questions which the servant, Quick, does not even understand. William is bewildered, yet very articulate and clever in his replies. Arthur in King John is another case of the Elizabethan idea of children, showing natural intellectuality or intuitive knowledge upon birth, which can not be explained by the Elizabethan aristocratic education. Arthur is represented as reflecting his gentle birthright, as much as Joan of Arc in Henry IV, Part 1 reflects her base heritage. This paper also deals with Lucius in Titus Andronicus, Clarence’s children of Richard III, the Macduff child in Macbeth, young Marcius in Coriolanus, and Mamillius in The Winter’s Tale.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Babb, Lawrence, "The Physiological Conception of Love in the Elizabethan and Early Stuart Drama", PMLA, 56, pp.1020~1035 (1941)
  2. Belsey, Catherine, "Shakespeare and Childhood", pp.32~48 (2007), Cambridge UP
  3. Berkeley, David S., "Blood Will Tell in Shakespeare’s Plays" (1984), Texas Tech UP
  4. Blake, Anne, "Children and Suffering in Shakespeare’s Plays", The Year book of English Studies, 23, pp.293~304 (1993)
  5. Blake, Anne, "Shakespeare’s Roles for Children: A Stage History", Theatre Notebook, 48, pp.122~137 (1994)
  6. Brooke, Tucker, "Shakespeare Apart", The Yale Review, 11(1), pp.102~116 (1921)
  7. Burton, Richard, "The Anatomy of Melancholy, What it is: With all the Kinds, Causes, Symptomes, Prognostickes, and Several Cures of it. In Three Maine Partitions with their several Sections, Members, and Subsections. Philosophically, Medicinally, Historically", ~
  8. Castiglione, Baldassare, "The Book of the Courtier", ~
  9. Clemen, Wolfgang, "A Commentary on Shakespeare’s Richard III" (2005), Routledge
  10. Craig, Hardin, "The Enchanted Glass: The Elizabethan Mind in Literature" (1935), Oxford UP
  11. Fletcher, Hattie, "Shakespeare and Childhood", pp.49~63 (2007), Cambridge UP
  12. Heberle, Mark A., "Infant Tongues: The Voice of the Child in Literature", pp.28~43 (1994), Wayne State UP
  13. Hiken, Arlin J., "Shakespeare’s Use of Children", Educational Theatre Journal, 15(3), pp.241~248 (1963)
  14. John, Ivor, "Introduction. The Works of Shakespeare" (1907), Bobbs-Merrill
  15. Knight, G. Wilson, "The Imperial Theme; Further Interpretations of Shakespeare's Tragedies including the Roman Plays" (1951), Methuen
  16. Knight, G. Wilson, "The Sovereign Flower; on Shakespeare as the Poet of Royalism" (1958), Methuen
  17. Knight, G. Wilson, "The Wheel of Fire; Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy with Three New Essays" (1966), Barnes and Noble
  18. Knowlton, Edgar C., "Nature and Shakespeare", PMLA, 51(3), pp.719~744 (1936)
  19. Lawhorn, Mark, "Shakespeare and Childhood", pp.233~249 (2007), Cambridge UP
  20. Markham, Francis, "The Booke of Honour. Or Five Decads of Epistles of Honour", ~
  21. Mason, John E., "Gentlefolk in the Making: Studies in the History of English Courtesy Literature and Related Topics from 1531 to 1774" (1935), U of Pennsylvania P
  22. Nenna, Sir John Baptista, "Nennio, or a Treatise of Nobility", ~
  23. Newman, Horatio Hackett, "Readings in Evolution, Genetics and Eugenics" (1921), U of Chicago P
  24. Partee, Morriss Henry, "Childhood in Shakespeare’s Plays" (2006), Peter Lang
  25. Partee, Morriss Henry, "Fear in Shakespearean Childhood", Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature, 44, pp.69~80 (1990)
  26. Pendleton, Thomas A., "Shakespeare’s Children", Mid-Hudson Language Studies, 3, pp.39~55 (1980)
  27. Rutter, Carol Chillington, "Shakespeare and Child’s Play" (2007), Routledge
  28. Shakespeare, William, "Shakespeare: The Complete Works" (1968), Harcourt, Brace & World
  29. Spencer, Theodore, "Shakespeare and the Nature of Man" (1942), Macmillan
  30. Spilka, Mark, "On the Enrichment of Poor Monkeys by Myth and Dream; or, How Dickens Rousseausticated and Pre-Freudianized Victorian Views of Childhood", Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 27, pp.171~179 (1984)
  31. Tillyard, E. M. W., "Shakespeare’s History Plays" (1946), Macmillan
  32. Tolman, Albert H., "Is Shakespeare Aristocratic?", PMLA, 22(3), pp.277~298 (1914)
  33. Whitaker, Virgil K., "Shakespeare’s Use of Learning: An Inquiry into the Growth of His Mind & Art" (1953), Huntington Library P

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)