중복보험의 개별보험종목 적용에 관한 법적고찰 —책임보험과 법무보험의 중복보험 문제를 중심으로—
A Study of the Meaning of Double Insurance between Legal Affairs Insurance and Liability Insurance
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The possibility of double insurance between legal affairs insurance and liability insurance is very in controversy subject. Legal affairs insurance is a type of insurance policy which covers policyholders against the potential costs of legal action. Liability insurance is a part of the general insurance system of risk financing to protect the insured from the risks of liabilities imposed by lawsuits and similar claims. It is possible that there is double insurance between legal affairs insurance and liability insurance because of the same coverage of those insurances. The insured cannot be protected from the insurers in that case. As a result, considering of double insurance case, therefore, if the insured didn't compensated by legal affairs insurance and by liability insurance because of the double insurance clause in view of the Korean Commercial Code. In these reasons, we should bring in a bill to improve the circumstance of double insurance case. Finally, it is necessary to codify some requirements of the double insurance clause in view of the Korean Commercial Code.
Abstract
The possibility of double insurance between legal affairs insurance and liability insurance is very in controversy subject. Legal affairs insurance is a type of insurance policy which covers policyholders against the potential costs of legal action. Liability insurance is a part of the general insurance system of risk financing to protect the insured from the risks of liabilities imposed by lawsuits and similar claims. It is possible that there is double insurance between legal affairs insurance and liability insurance because of the same coverage of those insurances. The insured cannot be protected from the insurers in that case. As a result, considering of double insurance case, therefore, if the insured didn't compensated by legal affairs insurance and by liability insurance because of the double insurance clause in view of the Korean Commercial Code. In these reasons, we should bring in a bill to improve the circumstance of double insurance case. Finally, it is necessary to codify some requirements of the double insurance clause in view of the Korean Commercial Code.
참고문헌 (26)
- 강위두, "상법강의(하)" (2004), 형설출판사
- 상법 일부개정법률안(보험편, 정부 제출)검토보고, "권기율", 국회 법제사법위원회 전문위원, ~ (2008)
- 권영수, "법률비용보험의 운영현황 및 활성화에 따라 예상되는 위험에 대한 대책", 조사연구 Review, (19) (2005), 금융감독원
- 권효상, "법무보험에 관한 연구 : 법제운용과 정착가능성을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2012
- 권효상, "한국에서의 법무보험의 정착가능성 — 보험약관의 면·부책과 사례를 중심으로 —", 경영법률, 20(3), pp.263~294 (2010), 한국경영법률학회
- 김성태, "보험법강론" (2001), 법문사
- 김헌무, "重複保險의 諸 問題", 경영법률, 17(2), pp.239~267 (2007), 한국경영법률학회
- 서돈각, "제3전정 상법강의(하)" (1985), 법문사
- 손주찬, "상법(하)" (2002), 박영사
- 손주찬, "제11정증보판 상법(하)" (2006), 박영사
- 송웅순, "법무서비스 개방과 그 대책(지정 토론 요지)", 저스티스, 34(5)통권 : 63 (2001), 한국법학원
- 신동호, "독일 D.A.S법률비용보험회사의 국내진출모델 연구(한국 손해보험회사의 해외진출과 비교)", 통합학술대회자료집, (단일) (2009), 한독경상학회
- 이기수, (2008), 박영사
- 이봉림, "법률비용보험의 국내시장 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 성균관법학, 20(2), pp.105~132 (2008), 법학연구소
- 이필규, "2009년 독일 보험계약법(VVG)" (2009), 세창출판사
- 장재옥, "법률서비스보험 연구(독일에서의 권리보호보험을 중심으로)", 법학논문집, 22(1) (1997), 중앙대학교 법학연구소
- 정찬형, "상법원론(하)" (1995), 박영사
- 채이식, "상법강의(하)" (2003), 박영사
- 최기원, "보험법" (1998), 박영사
- 국회, "상법 일부개정법률안", 의안번호1800550, ~ (2008)
- John Birds, "Birds’ Modern Insurance Law(Eight Edition)" (2010), Sweet & Maxwell
- Malcolm A Clarke, "The Law of Insurance Contracts(sixth edition)" (2009), Informa
- Böhme, "Allgemeine Bedingungen für die Rechtsschutzversicherung, 10. Aufl" (1995)
- Harbauer, "Rechtsschutzversicherung" (1987)