부분적 포괄대리권을 가진 사용인의 법적 쟁점
The Legal Issues on Employees Invested with Partial Comprehensive Agency Authority
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According the commercial law, commercial employees can be classified into three general categories including managers, employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority and employees of stores which sell goods. Among these people, employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority have been raised many issues and legal problems. While managers and employees of stores which sell goods are well defined, the definition and scope of employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority is somewhat vague and loosely defined. As a result, there has been an increasing number of legal matters regarding employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority. For example, directors or department heads generally considered as employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority. However, if they do not have the right, it is difficult to determine whether directors and department heads can be considered as employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority. The commercial employee system in Korea was adopted from Japanese commercial employee system which was created based on the German system. In particular, the Japanese commercial employee system has improved with economic development and social change which provides us a practical implication for Korean commercial employee system. More importantly, commercial employee is not embodied in the commercial law per se but it actually reflects the current roles of commercial employee in the Korean society. In other words, it is necessary to improve the legislation as the scope and duty of commercial employee has been changed. As noted earlier, employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority have been raised many issues and legal problems due to the fact that the commercial law or relevant legislation has not been responded the current status of employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority. Therefore, the purpose of the current study is to review legal issues regarding employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority. Moreover, this study attempts to provide a practical implication to this particular legal matter.
Abstract
According the commercial law, commercial employees can be classified into three general categories including managers, employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority and employees of stores which sell goods. Among these people, employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority have been raised many issues and legal problems. While managers and employees of stores which sell goods are well defined, the definition and scope of employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority is somewhat vague and loosely defined. As a result, there has been an increasing number of legal matters regarding employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority. For example, directors or department heads generally considered as employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority. However, if they do not have the right, it is difficult to determine whether directors and department heads can be considered as employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority. The commercial employee system in Korea was adopted from Japanese commercial employee system which was created based on the German system. In particular, the Japanese commercial employee system has improved with economic development and social change which provides us a practical implication for Korean commercial employee system. More importantly, commercial employee is not embodied in the commercial law per se but it actually reflects the current roles of commercial employee in the Korean society. In other words, it is necessary to improve the legislation as the scope and duty of commercial employee has been changed. As noted earlier, employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority have been raised many issues and legal problems due to the fact that the commercial law or relevant legislation has not been responded the current status of employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority. Therefore, the purpose of the current study is to review legal issues regarding employees invested with partial comprehensive agency authority. Moreover, this study attempts to provide a practical implication to this particular legal matter.
참고문헌 (14)
- 권기범, "상업사용인에 대하여 -지위발생의 요건과 대리권의 범위를 중심으로-", 서울법학, 16(1) (2008), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소
- 권재열, "부분적 포괄대리권을 가진 사용인으로 오인될 만한 유사한 명칭을 사용한 사용인에 대한 상법 제14조의 유추적용가능성 검토 -대법원 2007.8.23. 선고 2007다23425 판결에 대한 평석-", 상사판례연구, 21(3), pp.33~56 (2008), 한국상사판례학회
- 김광록, "부분적 포괄대리권을 가진 상업사용인의 권한범위에 관한 최근판례 연구 - 대법원 2009.5.28. 선고 2007다20440, 20457 판결 -", 법학논총, 24, pp.289~305 (2010), 법학연구소
- 이기수, "상법총칙․상행위법" (2010), 박영사
- 이철송, "상법총칙․상행위법" (2013), 박영사
- 신현윤, "2006년도 상법 판례의 회고와 전망 - 부분적 포괄대리권을 가진 상업사용인(제15조)을 중심으로 -", 상사판례연구, 20(1), pp.3~28 (2007), 한국상사판례학회
- 손주찬, "상법(상)" (2005), 박영사
- 최기원, "상법학신론(상)" (2004), 박영사
- 최완진, "상법판례강의" (2006), 법문사
- 최준선, "상법총칙․상행위" (2011), 삼영사
- 井上貞藏, "商業使用人問題の硏究" (1938), 千倉書房版
- 南保勝美, "商業使用人の代理權", 法律論叢, 78(4․5合倂) (2006)
- 梅謙次郞, "日本商法講義" (2001), 新靑出版
- 畠田公明, "商法․會社法總則講義" (2008), 中央經濟社
