남용적 회사분할에 대한 채권자취소권의 행사 − 일본 최고재판소 판결을 중심으로 −
The Creditor’s Right of Revocation to the Abusive Corporate-Division
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently many cases including abusive corporate-division have been seen in Japan and these corporate-divisions resulted in the damage of creditors. Mostly the obliger uses a corporate-division type that establish a new corporation in its process and distributes assets and debts between the existing company and the new company at his will to avoid creditor protection regulations. This is possible in Japan or Korea because the Acts(in Korea Commercial Code, in Japan Corporate Code) does not provide any creditor's right of objection to the corporate- division in some conditions. So in these situations it is raised the question that the creditor who does not have the right of objection to corporate-division can be afford the creditor's right of revocation provided in Civil Code. For many years in Japan there are several rulings that deal with this material and some lower courts have acknowledged the creditor's right of revocation to corporate-division. But in a theoretical approach we have to review whether it is reasonable to admit that right because this right is provided for the situations when partners do a on-to-one transactions but this right does not know the organizational actions like merger or corporate-division.
Abstract
Recently many cases including abusive corporate-division have been seen in Japan and these corporate-divisions resulted in the damage of creditors. Mostly the obliger uses a corporate-division type that establish a new corporation in its process and distributes assets and debts between the existing company and the new company at his will to avoid creditor protection regulations. This is possible in Japan or Korea because the Acts(in Korea Commercial Code, in Japan Corporate Code) does not provide any creditor's right of objection to the corporate- division in some conditions. So in these situations it is raised the question that the creditor who does not have the right of objection to corporate-division can be afford the creditor's right of revocation provided in Civil Code. For many years in Japan there are several rulings that deal with this material and some lower courts have acknowledged the creditor's right of revocation to corporate-division. But in a theoretical approach we have to review whether it is reasonable to admit that right because this right is provided for the situations when partners do a on-to-one transactions but this right does not know the organizational actions like merger or corporate-division.
참고문헌 (15)
- 노혁준, "회사분할의 제문제" (2013), 도서출판 소화
- 권기범, "현대 회사법론" (2011), 삼지원
- 이철송, "회사법강의" (2010), 박영사
- 법무법인 해마루, "사해행위취소소송연구" (2006), 도서출판 솔숲
- 김성호, "주식회사 분할의 법리" (2006), ㈜한국학술정보
- 정병덕, "영업양도에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2000
- 곽윤직, "민법주석(Ⅸ) 채권(2)" (1995), 박영사
- 江頭憲治郞, "會社法5(社債, 組織再編)" (2012), 第一法規株式會社
- 中村直人, "新會社法" (2005), 商事法務
- 北村雅史, "濫用的 會社分割と詐害行爲取消權(上)", 商事法務, (1990) (2013)
- 北村雅史, "濫用的 會社分割と詐害行爲取消權(下)", 商事法務, (1990) (2013)
- 竹田奈穗, "濫用的 會社分割におて法人格の適用が否定され詐害行爲取消權の行使が認定められた事例", 法と政治, 63(4) (2013), 關西學院大學
- 神吉正三, "濫用的 會社分割に對する詐害行爲取消權の行使", 金融法務事情, (1970) (2013)
- 新里慶一, "會社分割と詐害行爲取消權", 中京法學, 47(3) (2013)
- 込山芳行, "會社分割による新設分割と詐害行爲取消權行使の是非", 山梨學院 ロー・ジャーナル, (7) (2012)
