본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

이행기전의 이행거절과 채무자의 책임

A Study on the repudiation Before Performance is Due(anticipatory breach) and Debtor's Liability

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The Clause 2 of the Article 544 of the Korea Civil Law stipulates that avoidance of contract can be made without notice (accompanied by additional period of time of reasonable length for performance) in the case of repudiation after performance is Due, and the related theories and precedents accept, in the event of bilateral contract. extinction of plea of simultaneous performance and delay of debtor without tender. However, there is a disagreement on whether repudiation Before Performance is Due(anticipatory breach) can be treated as a new type of non-performance. This study examines previous theories and precedents on anticipatory breach in Korea and the intention to legislate the Clause 2 of the Article 544 of the Korea Civil Law. It also suggests that anticipatory breach be acknowledged as a new type of non-performance by providing its legal basis. Finally, this study introduces various views on anticipatory breach expressed in the discussions on the revision of the Korea Civil Law, and suggests the direction for the revision of anticipatory breach

Abstract

The Clause 2 of the Article 544 of the Korea Civil Law stipulates that avoidance of contract can be made without notice (accompanied by additional period of time of reasonable length for performance) in the case of repudiation after performance is Due, and the related theories and precedents accept, in the event of bilateral contract. extinction of plea of simultaneous performance and delay of debtor without tender. However, there is a disagreement on whether repudiation Before Performance is Due(anticipatory breach) can be treated as a new type of non-performance. This study examines previous theories and precedents on anticipatory breach in Korea and the intention to legislate the Clause 2 of the Article 544 of the Korea Civil Law. It also suggests that anticipatory breach be acknowledged as a new type of non-performance by providing its legal basis. Finally, this study introduces various views on anticipatory breach expressed in the discussions on the revision of the Korea Civil Law, and suggests the direction for the revision of anticipatory breach

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 김규완, "민법학강의(제12판)" (2013), 신조사
  2. 민사법연구회, "민법안의견서" (1957), 일조각
  3. 민의원⋅법제사법위원회, "민법안심의록 상권", ~ (1957)
  4. 지원림, "민법강의" (2003), 홍문사
  5. 김동훈, "이행거절과 계약해제-대상판결: 대법원 2003.2.26. 선고, 2000다40995판결-", 고시연구, 30(9) (2003)
  6. 성승현, "이행기 전의 이행거절과 민법 제544조의 단서", 법조, 53(4), pp.127~181 (2004), 법조협회
  7. 성승현, "한국민법에서의 이행거절제도와 그 비교법적 고찰", 민사법연구, 15(1) (2007), 대한민사법학회
  8. 양창수, "민법연구 제4권" (1997), 박영사
  9. 이주원, "이행기 전의 이행거절과 채무불이행(2005.8.19. 선고 2004다53173 판결: 공2005하, 1498)", 대법원판례해설57호(2005하반기), ~ (2006)
  10. 위계찬, "채무불이행의 독자적 유형으로서 이행거절", 한양법학, 24(1), pp.399~436 (2013), 한양법학회
  11. 吉川吉樹, "履行期前の履行拒絶に關する一考察(一)", 法學協會雜誌, 124(10) (2007)
  12. 石坂音四郞, "日本民法第3編債權總論上卷" (1919), 有斐閣書房
  13. 鳩山秀夫, "增訂日本債權法各論(上卷)" (1924), 岩波書店
  14. 北川善太郞, "註釋民法(10), 債權(1)", pp.399~426 (1987), 有斐閣
  15. 田島順, "債權法" (1940), 弘文堂書房
  16. 潮見佳男, "債權總論Ⅰ" (2003), 信山社
  17. Calamari, "The Law of Contracts" (1977)
  18. Decurtins, "Die Erfüllungsverweigerung vor Fälligkeit im System der Vertragsverletzung des Schweizerischen Obligationsrechts", ~ (1956)
  19. Emmerich, "Das Recht der Leistungsstörungen" (1997)
  20. Gugl, "Das Schweizerische Obligationsrecht" (2000)
  21. Oftinger, "Bundesgerichtspraxis zum Allgemeinen Teil des Schweize- rischen Obligationsrechts", ~ (1969)
  22. Looschelders, "Schuldrecht Allgemeiner Teil" (2006)
  23. Thur, "Allgemeiner Teil des Schweizerischen Obligationsrechts, 2 Bd" (1944)
  24. Treitel, "The Law of Contract" (2003)
  25. Treitel, "Remedies for Breach of Contract, A Comparative Account 126-28", ~ (1988)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)