소수주식의 전부취득제에서 지배주주와 소수주주의 상대적 이익- 소수주주 프리미엄의 필요성 -
The stock premium for minority shareholders during freeze out process
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
We examine how to evaluate the stocks during freeze out process. We particularly focus on the value of stocks owned by minority shareholders. This is an important topic both for academia and practice: Appraisal right is de factor the only practical way to protect minority shareholders at freeze out; How to value minority shares can determine the efficiency of mergers and acquisitions. We regard minority shareholders having long positions on put options and short position on call options. Majority shareholders have opposite positions. Then we consider information asymmetry and market liquidity in order to evaluate those positions. In conclusion, we suggest positive premium for minority shares at freeze out. This premium should increase with information asymmetry and stock volatility, but decrease with the liquidity of stocks.
Abstract
We examine how to evaluate the stocks during freeze out process. We particularly focus on the value of stocks owned by minority shareholders. This is an important topic both for academia and practice: Appraisal right is de factor the only practical way to protect minority shareholders at freeze out; How to value minority shares can determine the efficiency of mergers and acquisitions. We regard minority shareholders having long positions on put options and short position on call options. Majority shareholders have opposite positions. Then we consider information asymmetry and market liquidity in order to evaluate those positions. In conclusion, we suggest positive premium for minority shares at freeze out. This premium should increase with information asymmetry and stock volatility, but decrease with the liquidity of stocks.
참고문헌 (30)
- Amihud, Y., "The foundations of freezeout laws in takeovers", The Journal of finance, L9(3) (2004)
- Baker, M., "Global, local, and contagious investor sentiment", Journal of Financial Economics, 104(2012), pp.272~287 (2011)
- Bate, C., "Compensating shareholders frozen out in two-step mergers", Columbia Law Review, 78(3) (1978)
- Bates, T. W., "Shareholder wealth effects and bid negotiation in freeze out deals : Are minority shareholders left out in the cold?", Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2006), pp.681~708 (2006)
- The ‘Lemons effect’ in Corporate freeze outs, "Bebchuk, L. A.", NBER, ~, pp.6938 (1999)
- Booth, R. A., "The new law of freeze out mergers", Missouri law review, 49 (1984)
- Brudney, V., "Fair shares in corporate mergers and takeovers", Harvard Law Review, pp.297~346 (1974)
- Brudney, V., "A Restatement of Corporate Freezeouts", The Yale Law Journal, 87 (1978)
- Greene, E. F., "Corporate freeze out mergers : A proposed analysis", Stanford Law Review, 28(3) (1976)
- Grossman, S. J, "On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets", The American economic review, 70(3), pp.393~408 (1980)
- Grossman, S. J., "Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation", The Bell Journal of Economics, pp.42~64 (1980)
- Hull, J. C., "Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives" (2012), Pearson
- Johnson, S. A., "Managerial Incentives and Corporate Fraud: The Sources of Incentives Matter", Review of Finance, 13(1), pp.115~145 (2009)
- Khutorsky, A., "Coming in from the cold : Reforming shareholders’ appraisal right in freeze out transactions", Columbia business law review, 133 (1997)
- Kyle, A. S., "Continuous auctions and insider trading", Econometrica, 53(6) (1985)
- La Porta, R., "Legal determinants of external finance", The journal of finance, 52(3), pp.1131~1150 (1997)
- Lipton, M., "Takeovers & Freezeouts", Law Journal Seminars Press, 1 (1990)
- Lopez de Silanes, F., "Law and finance", Journal of Political Economy, 106, pp.1113~1155 (1998)
- Rho, H. J, "New squeeze out devices as a part of corporate law reform in Korea : What type of device is required for a developing economy?", Boston university international law journal, 29(41) (2011)
- 강대섭, "기업결합 형성단계에 있어서 주주의 보호", 법학연구, 34, pp.145~168 (2011), 부설법학연구소
- 金聖虎, "미국 회사법상 ＂소수주주 축출의 정당성＂에 관한 고찰", 기업법연구, 21(4), pp.297~316 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 김재형, "미국에서 합병대가의 유연화와 소수주주축출에 관한 입법의 변천과 법원의 대응", 기업법연구, 18(1), pp.57~74 (2004), 한국기업법학회
- 김진철, "축출합병에 있어서 소수주주의 보호에 관한 연구 -미국판례상 정당한 영업상의 목적-", 상사판례연구, 25(4), pp.269~295 (2012), 한국상사판례학회
- 김화진, "소수주식의 강제매수제도", 서울대학교 법학, 50(1), pp.321~350 (2009), 법학연구소
- 서완석, "상법상의 소수주주 축출제도 -소수주식 강제매수제도와 교부금 합병제도를 중심으로-", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.385~443 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 송종준, "폐쇄기업화거래의 공정요건과 소수파 주주의 보호", 상사법연구, 19(1) (2000)
- 송종준, "소수주주 강제퇴출법제의 국제적 신조류와 그 입법론적 수용 가능성 -미국,영국,독일법의 비교분석을 중심으로-", 증권법연구, 6(1), pp.1~38 (2005), 한국증권법학회
- 송종준, "소수주식 전부취득제의 입법의도와 해석방향", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.79~106 (2012), 한국기업법학회
- 정봉진, "2011년 개정 상법상 소수주식 강제매수제도", 강원법학, 35, pp.475~515 (2012), 비교법학연구소
- 최준선, "기업구조조정 수단으로서의 소수주주의 축출과 소수주주의 보호문제", 법조, 62(1), pp.44~76 (2013), 법조협회